1) While the leopard tanks canada use has an advantage in speed and agility, the Waffen SS's King Tiger have a much great range, allowing it to destory any leopard tanks in the open afghanistan fields.
2) To counter canada's artillery, the Waffen SS would use the "dora railway gun" and v2 rockets to aniliate whatever field artilierry canada can put up.
3) The waffen-SS is clearly more disciplined and skilled than the drunken teenage canadian troops. The waffen SS has exprience fighting in the harsh Stalingrad campaign, while the only thing canada has is fighting taliban with small arms. Unlike canadian soldiers, SS troops are brave and fight to the last bullet.
4) Although canada possess the f-18, the luftwaffe's Me bf-109 outnumbers the F-18 in the number of 1000-1. the f-18 will literally run out of bullets while the bf-109 blasts it into pieces with its cannon.
I would really like to see the tought process behind formulating these "thesis", really really like to, how does one come to such a conclusion????
Among all the BS this guy wrote as 'arguments' all of which was simply illogical, and unbased the fact that he claimed the SS fought at Stalingrad was startling, if so I'd like to know which divisions and when?!
Higher casualty rate than other NATO forces....I want to see stats cause as far as I know we have a VERY low casualty/death rate % with the number of troops that have rotated through since 2001.
His post reminds of that Greek guy on Youtube who thought you can invade the US by dodging our navy and landing on top of Marines and other people who wouldn't mind shooting stupid people like himself. What a funny post that was.