Page 3 of 20 FirstFirst 123456789101113 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 295

Thread: Super-sticky-medic-thread

  1. #31
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    germany.
    Age
    34
    Posts
    28

    Default

    the british army now is issued with the cat aswell as an israli bandage for compression.

  2. #32
    Time spent on reconnaissance is seldom wasted kayaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    @wall table of a greasy spoon cafeteria with our battered,red Mini outside...holding my Marie's hand
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HarleyDoc View Post
    OK guys, let's have a class on tampons. Tampons work very well for what they were designed to do: stop blood from exiting the ****** and running down a womans' leg. They absorb blood, they do not stop the uterus from bleeding. When they are saturated, they are replaced, and the uterus continues to bleed until the lining has been shed and the 28 day cycle repeats. A tampon was not designed to tamponade a severed artery from a bullet wound. If you stick a tampon in a bullet wound, it will absorb blood. This is very different from STOPPING bleeding. You may think the bleeding is stopped, but in reality you just can't see it for a while. In the meantime, the patient continues to exanguinate and slips further into hypovolemic shock.

    If you want to stop arterial bleeding, pack the wound with the latest QuickClot tea bags, and/or pack it full of Kerlix gauze or you may have to cut the wound edges open so you can get down to the artery and apply continuous direct pressure, and then pack it with a hemostatic agent like QuickClot and/or Kerlix.
    good post, keep it up.

    Another thing to remember is tampons are not sterile and you risk anaphylactic shock when inserting them into a wound.

  3. #33
    Naughty Nurse Waltzing_Matilda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Keeping an eye on the FiO2
    Age
    29
    Posts
    767

    Default

    Question for HarleyDoc;

    Are you guys using Novo7 in the field? If so are there any restrictions? $10,000 bucks per ampoule here in Aussie.

  4. #34

    Default

    at about $1 per mcg, high-dose rFVIIa (160 mcg/kg) would cost about $11,000.
    It has to be used only in some circumstances.

  5. #35
    Junior Member DeerPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NAG
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Hi folks,
    Has anyone used QuikClot in a real-life situation? What do you think of the stuff?

    Cheers.

  6. #36
    Junior Member imedic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    15

    Default Tactical Medical Treatment

    We've just had a new order of treatment brought in, just wondering if this is the generic standard for most countries.

    New order:

    M - Massive Haemorrhage
    A - Airway
    R - Respiration
    C - Circulation
    H - Head Injury
    H - Hypothermia

    Old treatment algorithm:

    D - Dangers
    R - Responsiveness
    S - Send for Help
    A - Airway
    B - Breathing
    C - Circulation

    Like the old system we still check for scene dangers and LOCs before anything else (so it should kinda read DRSMARCHH).

    Basically the big change was to deal with any massive bleed before anything else.

  7. #37
    Member HarleyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waltzing_Matilda View Post
    Question for HarleyDoc;

    Are you guys using Novo7 in the field? If so are there any restrictions? $10,000 bucks per ampoule here in Aussie.
    I've heard of it being flown in special to the 'Stan, but I have not used it personally. I think it would be restricted to higher echelon level care.

  8. #38
    Member HarleyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    USA
    Age
    44
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeerPark View Post
    Hi folks,
    Has anyone used QuikClot in a real-life situation? What do you think of the stuff?

    Cheers.
    QuikClot works very well when applied properly. Try to find the newer "tea bag" formulation as it is much easier to use and doesn't generate heat like the earlier version.

    I've seen guys sprinkle QuikClot on a wound like it was powdered sugar going on a donut. Wrong answer. It has to get packed into the wound up against the bleeding vessel and kept in place with some bulk kerlix or similar material.

  9. #39
    Moderator James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Washington
    Age
    39
    Posts
    14,043

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HarleyDoc View Post
    QuikClot works very well when applied properly. Try to find the newer "tea bag" formulation as it is much easier to use and doesn't generate heat like the earlier version.
    I've got some of that in my kit - it's available from Galls in 25mg and 100mg packs:

    http://www.galls.com/style.html?asso...og&style=FA212
    http://www.galls.com/style.html?asso...og&style=FA213
    Last edited by James; 11-27-2007 at 07:06 PM.

  10. #40
    Junior Member jorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    belgium
    Posts
    12

    Default

    we also have the c.a.t.in ouwer trauma kit.but only in operations or in missions.we dont get the kit for training in belgium.but they are quit good.

  11. #41
    Junior Member jorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    belgium
    Posts
    12

    Default

    you only use quikclot for major bleedings?and how do you use it?just put the pouder on the wound?

  12. #42
    Senior Member Sabre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jorn View Post
    you only use quikclot for major bleedings?and how do you use it?just put the pouder on the wound?
    Conventional methods of haemorrhage control should be used first. Quick clot is a 'failure to control' option. Compressing the wound or pressure point and elevating the limb are the best options for any form of limb bleed. Quick clot is best used for junctional bleeding, so bleeds in the groin, armpit or neck. You also need to be able to see the bleed. Just pouring it in isn't enough. You need to try and apply pressure to slow the bleeding and then clear any pooled blood to visualise the vessel. You need to swiftly clear the blood, pour the granules onto the vessel and reapply pressure. You need to do it virtually as fast as you can say it, otherwise the blood will just pool up again and you either get a nice clot that's floating about, not sat in the vessel blocking it, or it will just wash the granules out of the wound.

    The granules have been superceded by the sponges or bags of clotting agents that are easier to place in the wound and positively site on the vessel. They're very good, but they need a practiced medic to use them competently and should only be used when conventional simple methods won't work.

  13. #43
    Time spent on reconnaissance is seldom wasted kayaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    @wall table of a greasy spoon cafeteria with our battered,red Mini outside...holding my Marie's hand
    Age
    72
    Posts
    4,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabre View Post
    Conventional methods of haemorrhage control should be used first. Quick clot is a 'failure to control' option. Compressing the wound or pressure point and elevating the limb are the best options for any form of limb bleed. Quick clot is best used for junctional bleeding, so bleeds in the groin, armpit or neck. You also need to be able to see the bleed. Just pouring it in isn't enough. You need to try and apply pressure to slow the bleeding and then clear any pooled blood to visualise the vessel. You need to swiftly clear the blood, pour the granules onto the vessel and reapply pressure. You need to do it virtually as fast as you can say it, otherwise the blood will just pool up again and you either get a nice clot that's floating about, not sat in the vessel blocking it, or it will just wash the granules out of the wound.

    The granules have been superceded by the sponges or bags of clotting agents that are easier to place in the wound and positively site on the vessel. They're very good, but they need a practiced medic to use them competently and should only be used when conventional simple methods won't work.
    Informative post...

    BTW wasn't there a bloke from the military arrested because he used it to treat an injured civvy in the West Midlands?

  14. #44
    Junior Member jorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    belgium
    Posts
    12

    Default

    thanks for the info.what country or army started whit tccc?we got the lessons before we went to lebanon.

  15. #45
    Junior Member DeerPark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    NAG
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sabre View Post
    Conventional methods of haemorrhage control should be used first. Quick clot is a 'failure to control' option. Compressing the wound or pressure point and elevating the limb are the best options for any form of limb bleed. Quick clot is best used for junctional bleeding, so bleeds in the groin, armpit or neck. You also need to be able to see the bleed. Just pouring it in isn't enough. You need to try and apply pressure to slow the bleeding and then clear any pooled blood to visualise the vessel. You need to swiftly clear the blood, pour the granules onto the vessel and reapply pressure. You need to do it virtually as fast as you can say it, otherwise the blood will just pool up again and you either get a nice clot that's floating about, not sat in the vessel blocking it, or it will just wash the granules out of the wound.

    The granules have been superceded by the sponges or bags of clotting agents that are easier to place in the wound and positively site on the vessel. They're very good, but they need a practiced medic to use them competently and should only be used when conventional simple methods won't work.
    Nice post, this one and the others with pointers on Quikclot.

    I reckon this is one of those things which is almost impossible to teach in a classroom, unlike, say for example, teaching a medic how to insert an IV line. You can do this with relative safety with live casualties and botched jobs might result in bad bruises and some blood shed (especially if the medic under training has difficulty finding a vein).

    Not so with Quikclot. Even the docs on my end speak about the product without having actually used it.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •