Democracy in a Chinese classroom
Democracy in a Chinese classroom
By Weijun Chen
Director, Please Vote For Me
Thousands of years of life under a feudal system in China have fostered a culture where official power and authority have seldom been checked. Once one has the power, then one has everything, and so the whole nation would like to be government bureaucrats.
For example, 60% of China's college graduates choose government as their ideal career.
Chinese government officials are not civil servants in the Western sense, rather they are the people who possess real power.
Against this backdrop, I decided to film a class of eight-year-old schoolchildren in my home city of Wuhan as they went through the process of electing a class monitor.
It was the first time that the post had not been the gift of the teacher and it was the children's first taste of democracy. It turned out to be a cut-throat competition.
Wrong-footing rivals
The class monitor is charged with maintaining order in the classroom when the teacher is out of the room and is expected to report any rule breaking to the teacher.
The three candidates were all thoroughly determined to win this prized position of power, and they used a variety of tactics to try to achieve their ambition. Little Cheng Cheng was astonishing, very conniving. In fact they were all quite strategic in their campaigns.
They had to undertake several tasks to impress their classmates, such as performing a musical "turn" in front of the class, making speeches and taking part in debates where they had to point out each other's faults.
Every step of the way they were forcefully supported and guided by their parents, who behaved almost like political advisers.
Cheng Cheng, whose ultimate ambition was to be president of China, wanted to be class monitor because, he said: "You can order people around."
He was coached by his parents in speechmaking, singing, and wrong-footing his rivals.
Lone parent
Luo Lei had already been a class monitor for two years.
When asked whether he wanted the help of his parents in securing his classmates' votes, he said: "No, I will rely on my own strength.
"I don't want to control others. People should think for themselves." But soon his parents were helping him with techniques and tricks he could use to make himself popular with the class.
Xu Xiaofei, the only girl candidate, was reluctant at first to try to sell herself to the class, but her mother trained her to make speeches and tried very hard to build up her confidence.
But, as a lone parent, she felt she was at a disadvantage:
"I told her I couldn't help very much. She doesn't have a normal family with a father and mother. I can't help her the way Luo Lei's parents help him."
It is also important to understand that China's Family Plan policy of "one couple, one child" has led to a situation where children find there is too much hope from parents and grandparents pressing on their weak shoulders.
Personally, I do not think we have prepared people properly in how to be parents with only one child. It is a big problem.
Democracy in action
Every child or "small sun" has his parents caring for him and influencing him. His family all expect him to be a success in society, even though he is so young.
There is no world of childhood in China.
BBC POLL: WHY DEMOCRACY?
Twelve thousand people in 15 countries were polled in August 58% thought terrorism could destroy democracy
62% thought voting in national elections was very important
57% thought the US political system better equipped than China's to tackle climate change
14% said they would be very unlikely to support the idea of a global parliament
Luo Lei's parents were able to help his campaign by taking the class for a trip on the modern monorail system - which is managed by his father's police department - and by giving him gifts to hand out after his final speech.
But the "small suns" also had some tricks of their own.
Cheng Cheng ensured that his classmates shouted down Xu Xiaofei before she had even started to speak, and she found it difficult to recover.
The next day he told her it had all been Luo Lei's doing, and then proceeded to boo Luo-Lei off the stage. Later, in a debate in front of the class, he accused him of being a dictator who had beaten his classmates while he had been child monitor.
Luo Lei replied that even parents beat their children and added: "Do you think it's for no reason? It's because they did something wrong. If my method is wrong, I'll change it."
In the end, although the class agreed that Luo Lei had been very strict with them, they elected him in a secret ballot.
I believe the children's joy and sorrow throughout the election, their winning and losing, truly reflect the tough yet hopeful democratisation process in China.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...ic/7030725.stm
True, yes democracy has its faults, but history has shown that leaders who have power unchecked usually lead to corruption, human rights violations etc (ie China, junta, hitler, saddam, etc). People should have the right to vote in someone who represents them.
but they should also have the right to check if those who would represent them are socio/psychopaths and already took an oath to a secret society etc...Originally Posted by Vinny_121_DDS
oh and by the way...
http://www.democracyisnotfreedom.com/
Nice article Zeke
Loser why do you bother posting such drivel and taking away from the thread, get a life Dick
because people like you still think any "democracy" has something to do with a thing called "freedom"...
but you are right, i never had a life...
I saw the documentary by coincident a while ago.. it was hilarious, one of the kids tried to buy votes, then they made a list of negative sides of their opponents, just to say it face to face to the opponent.
Your post adds no value to the thread period, it's simple hijacking nothing more.
loserbydefault, I think your time here is limited I feel. Read the rules if you want to post messages.
Kids can be quick learners
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
