Thread: General Car Discussion

  1. #7636
    Senior Member Death.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    23
    Posts
    9,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seabeeEO View Post
    We dont like to put that much thought into 6 cylinder things.
    ..or 8 cylinder things.

    Chevys still runnin the push rod? lol

  2. #7637
    Senior Member jetsetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,083

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D3ath View Post
    Chevys still runnin the push rod? lol
    Just about the best engine made today. It is powerful, compact in size and weight, fuel efficient, and quite cheap to produce. Many European engines seem to be complicated just for the sake of being complicated with an elevated price coming with that. I can get an LS series engine that makes just as much power as a Mercedes 6.0+ liter V8 but only at a fraction of the price and with better fuel efficiency.

    Seriously: How are they doing compared to European cars with less V and less Liters...say an Audi A4 2,2 Liter or any other European car with 1,8-2,5l and under 200/230hp..I am asking because I somehow get the impression that the american cars with their big engines (they all seem to start at 3,5L and with V6 and more than 250hp while european cars start at 1,6 or 1,8L and around 100hp) are not as efficient as euro ones...am I totally wrong or how is it? And I am not talking about fuel efficiency, but about performance. If they are equal, why don't the US manufacturers start building smaller, yet sufficent in terms of performance for the car, engines which consume less fuel so the people who want to save on fuel don't need to buy asian or euro...I really don't know anything about US cars so I could be totally of the track here.
    Engine technology in Europe and the United States is at the same level with the US leading in some areas and the Europeans in others.

  3. #7638
    Member Michigun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Detroit
    Age
    24
    Posts
    599

    Default

    Ill stick with my pushrod lt1 and you stick with your mod motor 4.6 a simple 500 dollar cam and heads package will bring me power only you will see with a blower all the while still getting 26+ mpg and im not even talking lsx motors. Theres a reason the pushrod motor is still around, cant really explain it better then what jetsetter has already said.

    Werent you just bitchn about a water pump being a tough job to replace and now your bitchin about simplicity of a motor?

  4. #7639
    Senior Member Death.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    23
    Posts
    9,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seabeeEO View Post
    Ill stick with my pushrod lt1 and you stick with your mod motor 4.6 a simple 500 dollar cam and heads package will bring me power only you will see with a blower all the while still getting 26+ mpg and im not even talking lsx motors. Theres a reason the pushrod motor is still around, cant really explain it better then what jetsetter has already said.

    Werent you just bitchn about a water pump being a tough job to replace and now your bitchin about simplicity of a motor?
    LOL, stand down chevy boy. I wasn't talking down on the LS series, though I am stating it is simple and not much thought in it as far as technology goes, which obviously there isn't.

    And yes, when you have to disassemble the entire front of a car to take out a water pump, I would call that complicated. If what you think I'm doing is bitching, your daily interactions with other people must be horrible.

  5. #7640
    Senior Member Death.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Age
    23
    Posts
    9,738

    Default

    This guy's V6 woman stang is badass.



    474 rwhp.

  6. #7641
    Senior Member LoboCanada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,204

    Default

    I has a problem. I have tires and rims that belonged to a 2004 Audi A4. I'm getting a new Volkswagen City Golf (a 2004 Golf MK4 with new bumpers etc...) and I wanted to know if I could put the tires/wheels from the Audi onto the golf. I'm guessing there's a slight chance that they would fit on the Golf because of the parts commonality between Audi's and VW's. Thanks in advance.

    Edit: the rims are 17-18 inches in diameter

  7. #7642
    Potential Getaway Driver Aerosoul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    41,303

    Default

    Which engine of the A4?
    You could probably go to Tirerack.com and select the models, they tell you the tire size...and then compare.

  8. #7643
    Senior Member LoboCanada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,204

    Default

    18T. It was an Avant if that helps. Thanks Aerosoul, will check out.

  9. #7644
    Suspended for infractions
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Curules Equi. I'm Happy.
    Posts
    12,992

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SHAM View Post
    Romanian Car Chase, might even be Connaught Ranger
    That's terrible publicity for GM! So this is the Romaninan version of the Blitz heh?

  10. #7645
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KoTeMoRe View Post
    That's terrible publicity for GM! So this is the Romaninan version of the Blitz heh?
    Sorry to disappoint you, but romanian police does not use those cars, so i doubt that is in Romania.

  11. #7646
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    Heard on the news tonight:

    -Obama made a phone call to fire GM CEO today
    -New CEO has 60 days to come up with a plan... this is GM last chance
    -Chrysler on the other hand has 30 days to find an agreement with Fiat!
    Hold still:
    -Chrysler plans to send several of its engineers to Italy to learn how to make cars the "european way", and make them smaller in size, more fuel efficient.

  12. #7647
    Makes me fart lots wagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Hocus Pocus Diplodocus the Psychic Dinosaur
    Age
    36
    Posts
    10,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post

    -Chrysler plans to send several of its engineers to Italy to learn how to make cars the "european way", and make them smaller in size, more fuel efficient.
    Why would you send them to Italy? To make Chryslers more unreliable? Why not Germany or France?

    Meh.

  13. #7648
    What's crackalackalackin? Vehemence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Independent International Commission on Decommissioning
    Age
    31
    Posts
    6,371

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    Heard on the news tonight:

    -Obama made a phone call to fire GM CEO today
    -New CEO has 60 days to come up with a plan... this is GM last chance
    -Chrysler on the other hand has 30 days to find an agreement with Fiat!
    Hold still:
    -Chrysler plans to send several of its engineers to Italy to learn how to make cars the "european way", and make them smaller in size, more fuel efficient.
    Please provide more information.

    What happens when GM's 'last chance' deadline comes around? Will the U.S. invade GM?

    What italian automaker will Chrysler engineers be learning how to make cars from? Ferrari? Because maybe Fiat is not the best solution to Chrysler's problem. Christ knows the Germans have already tried to help them with Daimlers buyout of Chrysler. Several years later Chrysler was dropped with several billions in lost revenue to Daimler.

  14. #7649
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    I just wrote what i heard on the news literally...

    I know Fiat are not famous for their reliability.

    Good point on "the Germans already tried".

    edit

    Maybe they extrapolated on this (bold)
    WASHINGTON: The White House has given ailing US automaker Chrysler 30 days to reach a deal with Italian auto giant Fiat to qualify for more US
    government loans, the New York Times reported Monday.

    Chrysler would get no more help from the government if it fails to conclude the proposed alliance with Fiat by April 30, the paper said, citing administration officials.

    "Fiat would make available to us its entire product portfolio and powertrain technology, worldwide distribution capabilities for vehicles we produce today and synergies in the areas of purchasing and engineering, among others.
    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/4334663.cms

    edit again:

    Jeep Can Provide SUV Platforms for Fiat
    A Chrysler-Fiat alliance could finally give Fiat an SUV lineup it's never had. Chrysler's vaunted Jeep brand is renowned for its capabilities and historical impact on the automotive world and would provide engineering and platforms with which Fiat could develop its own sport/utility vehicles. In the past, Fiat has relied on collaborations with Land Rover and Nissan for their SUV models.
    http://www.trucktrend.com/features/n...iat/index.html
    Oh Boy
    Last edited by xav; 03-30-2009 at 03:32 PM.

  15. #7650
    What's crackalackalackin? Vehemence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Independent International Commission on Decommissioning
    Age
    31
    Posts
    6,371

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •