Just a service or part of the restoration?
Just a service or part of the restoration?
More of a repair & tune than anything else. The bloke has had a few dramas with the efi stuff since he built it and I've sorted most of it out. It actually drives quite well and is pretty torquey for a little motor. It cost about $50K... alot of it doing things two or three times due to poor quality (but expensive) new parts and such.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/K...Two_682174.htm
Ken Block is at it again.
They show flights over the sea and countryside and stupid leaves flying around like 5 times...i got it, you have a helicopter and an awesome camera at your disposal...show me the car...
the spoiler is great and the front has a touch of aston martin.
I'd certainly hope so. It would be rather disappointing to have a V6 auto Rustang beat a LanEvo... even if you weren't OMFG TOUGE BATTUL'ing.
On that note... local drivers on a local road...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHZKiWIBXIY
I might've already posted it, big whoop.
It's actually pretty much the best sedan around for someone who needs space and enjoys a car with a great, solid setup in the sport-luxury segment.
The looks are a question of personal taste. I think the front looks great and the back needs some time to grow on me.
And like with alot of cars, the Panamera gives a total different impresson in reality than on videos or pictures.
Sounds like a 4G63 to me. And the trail of smoke following it..
Here, I made a ****ty video infront of the Porsche Museum.
Eat a dick.
Cannot say a word on how it drives. The looks is a no-no for me, as for any other Porsche, especially all the others that try to look like 911 in different packages (really dislike the Cayenne, which stands right in front of me in my garage).
As for the difference between reality than pictures, I think BMWs are the most affected by this.