This looks like a more pragmatic design... it looks as useful as the Juan Carlos class of Spain or Cavour class of Italy.
I think a ship of this size (displacement of 35,000 tons, but dunno if it's full or empty) does more closely fit the relative industrial and economic capacities of Korea, roughly between Spain's and Italy's. However, it also seems that Korea needs more guided-missile ships, ASW ships, and submarines than an aircraft carrier right now, given its most immediate military threats... still, this type of aircraft carrier is a lot cheaper than the KDX-III. Juan Carlos class of Spain cost $460 million as opposed to KDX-III's $920 million, roughly half the price. Makes you wonder which hardware among those two (a medium-sized aircraft carrier or a super-sized guided-missile destroyer) is more helpful in so-called 'keeping up with the Joneses'. Japan, India, China, Brazil, big EU countries... they all have or are going to possess an aircraft carrier or two soon. The lack of a full-fledged aircraft carrier exposes the inferiority complex of the ROK Navy, having no proper device to exercise its force projection capability around the world. Well, blame Best Korea. Things would have been so much better if Best Korea just became even better...







Reply With Quote






























































