Another thing to add. Rangers are almost always working by themselves, and just have that unique look. In most SF pics you will see them working with ANA or ANP. And it reflects their different mission sets. I haven't heard of an SF mission that wasn't done with Afghans. Hope this helps a little.
Sorry, yes that was confusing. Normally, Army Special Forces work with the ANA or ANP is what I meant(in Afghanistan). So, you can see, that in the pictures of SF there are always a couple ANA tagging along somewhere in the set of pics. Where as Rangers are working alone as Infantry platoons or whatnot, with no ANA tagging along. Hope this clears it up. Keep in mind this is strictly my personal observations, disregard if you know otherwise. I won't pretend to be a subject matter expert in something I am not around personally.
Oh, and Soli, heard and acknoweldged.
It's getting harder and harder to make any post on this forum section(others, like Military History and Tactics, have great postings) without getting someone pissed off, and the quality of posts are going down in just these last few months since I've joined(a few BTDT's help bring some quality up). It's like my high school, a lot of pettiness and backstabbing. So I'm probably gonna stop even trying, even if it's just to help someone with a legit question like smilodon. Until then, all I ask is I can use the website for PMs to military BTDTs, because they give me great advice for my future career. Thanks.