+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Picatinny rail submitted for NATO approval as STANAG

  1. #1
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,142

    Picatinny rail submitted for NATO approval as STANAG

    NATO rail, Standardized Rail. STANAG Rail are the possible name, but looks like a possible approval of the 1913std Picatinny rail might become a NATO standard.




    This is the new revised spec submitted for NATO approval


    this is the current 1913std spec.


  2. #2
    Senior Member Vince S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Canada, home of the world's best singletracks
    Age
    23
    Posts
    4,741

    Now I know what I'll do on the CNC at work

  3. #3
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,424

    The letter is eight years old...

  4. #4

    It's pretty much a defacto standard for most western militaries.

  5. #5
    Low Speed, High Drag Hispeed1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Staying frosty
    Posts
    3,713

    The Picatinny/1913 rail is very useful on small arms.

  6. #6
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,142

    Quote Originally Posted by Jippo View Post
    The letter is eight years old...
    yes, but NATO will finally gonna make a decision to standardize it within this year.

    British just spec'ed Daniel Defense as the rail supplier for the SA80 along with Gripod as the VFG and Tangodown panels. this is for deployment on 70k SA80A2s.
    Last edited by SMGLee; 03-21-2008 at 10:03 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member D-gin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    The Rabbit-Hole
    Posts
    13,831

    Quote Originally Posted by SMGLee View Post
    British just spec'ed Daniel Defense as the rail supplier for the SA80 along with Gripod as the VFG and Tangodown panels. this is for deployment on 70k SA80A2s.

    Sounds like I should go ahead and buy those extras I've been meaning to put on my AR.


  8. #8
    Junior Member esquiar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    16

    The picatinny was pretty much the standard anyway.

  9. #9
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,142

    The spec was all over the palce for those European manufactures. this standardization will help in getting all the future rail spec in line so all EU countries can have a STANAG rail system to share common components.

  10. #10
    Member xepharo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Canadian in Boston, MA
    Age
    23
    Posts
    336

    Are there any pictures of those SA80A2s sporting those sexy accessories?
    Can't find any. I wonder how it would look like.

  11. #11
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,142

    Daniel defense just got awarded the SA80 rail contract. so I don't believe there are any pictures available just as yet.

    It will take a good amount of time for those to be filter through the channel.

  12. #12
    Senior Member REMOV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Krakow, Poland
    Posts
    2,100

    We can imagine how it looks like
    The Combat Support Equipment Integrated Project Team (CSE IPT), part to the Ministry of Defence United Kingdom, has a requirement for design, production and supply of a new Handguard and Downgrip for the SA80A2 Rifle to give improved grip capability. There is a possible requirement for up to quantity 8,000 of each item for Urgent Operational Requirements. There is a further possible requirement for up to quantity 15,000 to replace in service equipment.

    The following Key User Requirements are to be met:

    Handguards
    1. Must have quadruple Picatinny rail (Military Standard 1913) fitted to 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock positions.
    2. Must be easy to remove by the user in field conditions without the need for additional tools.
    3. Must not necessitate any design changes to the body of the in service weapons.
    4. The Handguard must be small enough to be held by all hand sizes, i.e one size fits all.
    5. Must have the facility for user access to the gas parts without having to remove the Handguard from the weapon.
    6. Must allow fitment of SUSAT, CWS, Maxikite and iron sight to the weapon without removing the Handguard.
    7. Must have the facility to fit an in-service SA80 sling.
    8. Must have the facility on the Handguard (right-hand side) to incorporate a pressel for the Laser Light Model LLM01.
    9. Able to function in environmental categories C1 to A2.

    Downgrips
    1. Must allow users to control the front of the rifle with their left hand without discomfort, whilst wearing full OSPREY body armour.
    2. The Downgrip is not height, build or reach specific, i.e. one size fits all.
    3. Must have the ability to fold away when not in use.
    4. Must have a bipod function that stows away.
    5. The Downgrip shall not be integrated with the Handguard as a single item but shall be attached via the Picatinny rail and shall therefore be adjustable along the length of the Handguard.

  13. #13
    Androgynous Molli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,686

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    62

  15. #15
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,142

    I believe those that you both have posted are B&T product.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts