Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: So I checked out the SCAR

  1. #1
    Senior Member BrianT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    1,510

    Default So I checked out the SCAR




    I was impressed. One problem I noticed is it's very easy to click to automatic. Automatic is where semi used to be on the M4, and semi is halfway between where semi and safe were on the M4. I'll bet as soon as we jump in a shoot house with these babies, guys will be going auto on targets accidently. Otherwise, the buttstock is highly adjustable, the weight is light, and it feels well designed. I think some guys might hurt themselves with the recipricating charging handle until they're used to it.

    Criticism was mixed bag. The weapon is 'complicated' in that it's highly adjustable and ambidextrous, and seemed to have more parts, so some guys seem worried about it, but most were pretty stoked.

    Plus some Mk46s were standing by to be inspected so I took a quick snap. Thought you guys would like it.


    Snipers brought there Mk13s over, I thought you guys might want to see them.

  2. #2
    Hammer Time T3ngu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oztralia
    Age
    88
    Posts
    16,345

    Default

    Thanks for posting those BrianT

  3. #3

    Default

    Very nice pics. Is there a timeframe for when these are going to actually replace the M4A1? What's the acronym I'm looking for? FUE? IOC?

  4. #4
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    I was impressed. One problem I noticed is it's very easy to click to automatic. Automatic is where semi used to be on the M4, and semi is halfway between where semi and safe were on the M4. I'll bet as soon as we jump in a shoot house with these babies, guys will be going auto on targets accidently. Otherwise, the buttstock is highly adjustable, the weight is light, and it feels well designed. I think some guys might hurt themselves with the recipricating charging handle until they're used to it.
    Interesting, that same reason was why the control was changed. they asked for fire control to be half the travel of the std M4 control for better and quicker access to various firing mode...


    Quote Originally Posted by BrianT View Post
    Plus some Mk46s were standing by to be inspected so I took a quick snap. Thought you guys would like it.
    Those are still the MOD0, have you guys received the MOD1s yet?


    Awesome pictures, thanks for taking time out to share it with us.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Ghostryder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    "...they vibrate ass hell"
    Posts
    1,788

    Default

    Thank You, Sir

  6. #6
    Senior Member BrianT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SMGLee View Post
    Interesting, that same reason was why the control was changed. they asked for fire control to be half the travel of the std M4 control for better and quicker access to various firing mode...
    Makes sense, but we're just so use to the M4 that it's habit.



    Those are still the MOD0, have you guys received the MOD1s yet?


    Awesome pictures, thanks for taking time out to share it with us.
    I believe they're MOD0s. I'm unaware of ever getting rid of our original inventory. There might be some MOD1s trickled around from MOD0s we broke. I'll go take a look at the side of one tomorrow. What's the difference by the way?

  7. #7
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,239

    Default

    Brian,

    the biggest noticeable difference is the rail system are reversed. basically they took the MOD0 handguard rail and turn it upside down. so the top rail is now the bottom rail...

  8. #8
    Senior Member SilentType's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    Yeah, I had questioned the decision to go with a reciprocating charging handle, but I guess it was felt that it will be easier to clear malfunctions or use as a forward assist. Obviously had they wanted to go with a non-reciprocating charging handle they could have, but I would love to hear the reasoning behind that more.

    With 226 failure/malfunctions out of 10,000 rounds between 10 SCAR L rifles in the US Army's Dust Test I'd be pretty confident in it considering the M4 had almost 8 times as many failures.

    For folks interested in seeing instructional videos on field stripping and so forth on the SCAR visit the new USA company website.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Fireball Sanchez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,047

    Default

    Why must you be the screen door to my submarine?

    Another reason for me to seriously consider The Big Green [ err... grey now, I suppose] Fantastic shots, better weapons and I'm glad to see you men getting the best that our nation can afford. Are these all 5.56 or are you getting some of the 7.62 as well? Those Mk46 are badass and the AI's even more so.

    Again thanks for the info, thank you for your service, and now I need to go back to pondering whether or not to try for an Opt. 40.........

  10. #10
    Senior Member dave81's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Over Macho Grande
    Posts
    2,710

    Default

    Are those Blood Diamond pants?

    Just kidding. Love the "insider" photos. Keep posting them!

  11. #11
    Senior Member BrianT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    1,510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SMGLee View Post
    Brian,

    the biggest noticeable difference is the rail system are reversed. basically they took the MOD0 handguard rail and turn it upside down. so the top rail is now the bottom rail...
    Haha, that's hilarious. A buddy of mine has the Mod1. We used to think it was some ****ed up jerry-rigged Mk46. I figured someone somehow broke the bottom rail or something and they decided to just flip the handrail over. He had a problem getting the KAC pistol grip to attach to the rail because of the way it's shaped. It's got a weird curvature to it. The tango down one worked fine though. Learn something new.

  12. #12
    mp.net numba wan Chinaman SMGLee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,239

    Default

    That is funny....

    I like to know what kind of curve is on that rail, the one I saw was straight...

    the TD grip is actually going to be a SOCOM item for the Mk48 and 46....

    I even saw a Mk46Mod1 with a SCAR style stock.....


    hey, do you have more pics of the Mk46 with the TD grip?

  13. #13
    FN FAL Enthusiast & Saffie envoy for the League of Cantankerous Old Farts. Masai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Member of The Malicious League of Saffie H@X0R$ (MLSH) ™©
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    Its still a good weapon, but i dont think it can live up to its internet hype.


    give it 5 years of active service and then watch all the OMFG!!! D3LT@ SniperZ jump on the next best thing

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,342

    Default

    Thanks for posting BrianT.

    By the way... giant arms on those guys holding the SCARs, on the second pic. ^^

  15. #15
    Loves the tunnel
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    604

    Default

    great pics mate, would love to get my hands on those mk46's. are those AW's 338 or 308?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •