Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Zippora Seven : topless with 16 years old

  1. #1
    bogan Violet Fashion by Mindy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Weimar
    Age
    35
    Posts
    8,706

    Default Zippora Seven : topless with 16 years old

    [*******black][*******#660000]AN Australian magazine is being investigated after photographing a 16-year-old girl topless in two fashion shoots.[/COLOR]

    [*******black]NSFW cointains topless photos of a minor[/COLOR]


    [/COLOR]
    Last edited by Hollis; 05-12-2008 at 02:10 PM. Reason: removed link, per Calanen advice. This forum is US based

  2. #2
    Banned user T3ngu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oztralia
    Age
    89
    Posts
    17,493

    Default

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. What can I say........
    Last edited by T3ngu; 05-11-2008 at 11:52 PM. Reason: I peeked as well

  3. #3
    Faux Phallus Smuggler
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,384

    Default

    yet the online picture was uncensored also (no blacked over mammillary ducts, and yea, i snuck a peek).

    where was the agent, modeling agency, photographer, photography agency, magazine agency, and lets not forget model herself to set limits. Where were her parents, who might approve of modeling, but didn't specify NO full/partial nudity, and where was her self-respect ??

  4. #4
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    7,849

    Default

    Its only child *********** under s 91H Crimes Act 1900 in NSW Australia if the person being photographed is under the age of 16, so under State law there is not a problem. However, under Federal law, you cannot obtain a classification if it shows ****** conduct or is a photograph of ****** nature of a person under the age of 18. Without a classification, it cannot be published or shown. So, it is likely that the Feds will have something to say to this magazine.

    By the way, for everyone in the United States pretty much, you are committing an offence by viewing the material and clicking on the link that Min has posted. At work or not. The offence is committed by you being in posession of the material. How are you in possession you say? It is in your cache once you look at it.

    Min, you might want to make your warning a bit more explicit for the benefit of our US members, especially those on US military installations.

    Australia and UK however, are good as I understand it. Most of Europe is likely to be OK.

    While the prospect of being busted is perhaps remote, I counsel our American members to respect the law of their home country.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    See, this is where the age questions slides into a grey area. Morally, it is no more outrageous than if the model were ten or fifteen months older. And yet, the law is the law.

    BTW, what's Australia's age of consent? I know that in some place, it's 16-17, as opposed to the more usual 18.

  6. #6
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    7,849

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rictor View Post
    See, this is where the age questions slides into a grey area. Morally, it is no more outrageous than if the model were ten or fifteen months older. And yet, the law is the law.

    BTW, what's Australia's age of consent? I know that in some place, it's 16-17, as opposed to the more usual 18.
    16 for girls, 18 for men.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,729

    Default

    You just know that whoever made that law had a big, pervy grin on his face. The two-year discrepancy is like a neon "Jailbait Here, Dive In" sign.

  8. #8
    Member Ivo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    105

    Default

    I thought it was a Kiwi rag.

  9. #9
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    7,849

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ivo View Post
    I thought it was a Kiwi rag.
    No - New Zealand modelling agency is who the model is with. But the magazine is definitely Australian.

  10. #10
    A raging feminist's trauma haunts me to this day
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,208

    Default

    Eh, where "art" is concerned the question is far more flexible, as opposed to ***********. For example Thora Birch was topless in "American Beauty" while under age. Kiera Knightly was topless at 15 in some movie. I assume there was parental consent for these photos.

    I think that if she can consent to *** she can do something like this. They're just ****ies people.

  11. #11
    Pusser
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Two mouthfuls away from Heaven
    Posts
    4,263

    Default

    I guess those who are outraged by this shoot as 'going to far' have never Googled 'barely legal'.
    As Calanen pointed out, she is of legal age here in Oz, and you are all crims for looking at her, well in the US anyway.

    Ezy

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,082

    Default

    Its ever lasting fight between art people and nudity conservatives.

  13. #13
    No Good Bloody Seppo California Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Watching
    Age
    51
    Posts
    40,209

    Default

    Her parents should be beaten just for giving her that name. Retards. It sounds like the name of some bad Japanese ****** anime movie.

  14. #14
    Miss Convicted 2009 SBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Dividing my time between the far east and the east coast.
    Age
    30
    Posts
    21,577

    Default

    "Jippora Sebenteenu"

  15. #15
    Senior Member playtym's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    9,531

    Default

    OK, enough legal talk, lets get to the important bit.

    The article says there were pictures of her topless on a horse in the March issue. Who's got those pics?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •