Page 5 of 107 FirstFirst 123456789101112131555105 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1592

Thread: Handgun procurement

  1. #61
    Senior Member ed316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    YOUR place on MY place.
    Posts
    13,052

    Default

    Both are good calibers, it comes down to your preference.

  2. #62
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freibier
    It's E(k)=MV²/2
    So it is, was writing very fast. Sorry about that.

    -jippo

  3. #63
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sergey31
    Take two of the same/similar handguns (like Sig Sauer or Glock).... One chambered in .45ACP and the other in .357SIG.
    .45 in 230gr and 357SIG in 125gr shoot them both and tell me what you think then.
    I can actually bet $ on this one.
    No need to bet anything, all really depends on the matters I written. Pressure is part of the recoil as in escaping gas in the muzzle, as it has mass too, but it is not nearly the most important part.

    Compare .223 and 7.62 in carbine for instance. .223 has very high pressure still at the muzzle, but significantly less recoil. Reason is that .223 also has only 2/3's of the kinetic energy [E(k)] of the 7,62x39.


    -jippo

  4. #64
    Senior Member sergey31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Californiastan.
    Posts
    3,101

    Default

    ............edit
    Last edited by sergey31; 11-18-2005 at 10:37 AM.

  5. #65
    Senior Member sergey31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Californiastan.
    Posts
    3,101

    Default

    Cartridge Caliber/mm Bullet mass (g) Muzzle Velocity Muzzle Energy (joules)
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Centerfire Hornet .22 3.0 g 820 m/sec 2,690 fps 1,009 joules
    Remington NATO .223/5.56mm 3.6 g 1,006 m/sec 3,301 fps 1,822 joules
    M1 Carbine .30 7.1 g 607 m/sec 1,991 fps 1,308 joules
    Winchester .30-30 9.7 g 728 m/sec 2,388 fps 2,560 joules
    Soviet AK-47, 7.62mm 8.0 g 715 m/sec 2,346 fps 2,045 joules
    Lee-Enfield .303 11.7 g 770 m/sec 2,526 fps 3,469 joules
    Winchester,NATO,FN .308/7.62x51mm 11.7 g 3,744 joules
    Winchester .458 Magnum 33.0 g 643 m/sec 2,110 fps 6,822 joules (1)
    Dakota .450 Magnum 32.4 g 747 m/sec 2,451 fps 9,040 joules (2)
    Weatherby .460 Magnum 32.4 g 793 m/sec 2,602 fps 10,187 joules (3)
    Browning MG .50 caliber 46.7 g 857 m/sec 2,812 fps 17,149 joules (4)

    I never found AK 47/SKS or AR 15 or even Kel Tec SU 16(which is nearly half the weight of AR) to be any major difference in recoil at all.
    Handguns are totally different story especial when shooting with one hand and fast follow up shots.


    BTW .223 has the same SAAMI cup pressure as standard military 7.62x39mm if not less.
    5.6NATO has only 8,000 more - not that big of a deal in rifle especially when you consider their cartidge weight.

  6. #66
    Senior Member I'mOnlyHalfPolish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    wow great info everyone, geez especially stuka and sergey, that was amazing. this is probably the best Q&A post ive ever had by far...

    ok ok ok i will admit i asked a "loaded" question though...

    i've fired a glock (and sig, the sig was not near as bad) in .40S&W and a Colt 1911 in .45ACP...

    this is just me of course...but the .40 kicked like a BEAST! compared to the .45 and i was kind of always wondering if this had anything to do with the actual speed/velocity of the rounds (of course different weapons taken into account). of course that was me assuming that it was solely b/c the .40 was a quicker round than the .45, but it seems there is more to it than that. plus the 1911 seemed to be a bit more "top heavy" as i say, which i actually prefer b/c it allows for greater control when firing multiple rounds...

    put it this way, i fired a glock (not sure of the model number but it was some where b/n the full size and the compact?) in .40S&W several times including different angles with my hand (sideways, no need to try to sound scientific here, ha) and it has a beasty recoil. i fired 50 rounds through .45 for CHL (which like i said i never got, im a jackass) and i felt like i could shoot another 50+ rounds, no biggie...

    but the .40 did seem to be substantially more accurate, but a good portion of this is due to shooter err im sure.

  7. #67
    Classless Tard. BadKarma26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dry Land
    Posts
    6,156

    Default

    yah same here. the .40s ive fired all pretty "snappy" (for lack of a better description) the 45s are a little easier to control IMO

  8. #68
    Senior Member Jippo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,695

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sergey31
    I never found AK 47/SKS or AR 15 or even Kel Tec SU 16(which is nearly half the weight of AR) to be any major difference in recoil at all.

    Then I can't really help you, can I?

    If you can't find any difference in recoil, take a timer with you next time you go on range. The difference should be pretty obvious.

    But in the mean time, Newtonian Physics still remain more or less world standard...


    -jippo

  9. #69
    trying to be celibate Seraphim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Curing The Sick With My Noodley Appendage
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sergey31
    Take two of the same/similar handguns (like Sig Sauer or Glock).... One chambered in .45ACP and the other in .357SIG.
    .45 in 230gr and 357SIG in 125gr shoot them both and tell me what you think then.
    I can actually bet $ on this one.

    I dont think a Sig and Glock are similiar...especially if your talking about the Sig Classic full size. Only way to compare is with the exact same pistol with the same ammo from the same box.

  10. #70
    Senior Member I'mOnlyHalfPolish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    hey karma what was the make of the .40's you fired?

  11. #71
    Senior Member sergey31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Californiastan.
    Posts
    3,101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by †Seraphim†
    I dont think a Sig and Glock are similiar...especially if your talking about the Sig Classic full size. Only way to compare is with the exact same pistol with the same ammo from the same box.
    I meant two Glock in different caliber or two Sigs not Glock compared to Sig.
    Both of those manufacturers offer all service calibers.

  12. #72
    trying to be celibate Seraphim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Curing The Sick With My Noodley Appendage
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sergey31
    I meant two Glock in different caliber or two Sigs not Glock compared to Sig.
    Both of those manufacturers offer all service calibers.
    Gotcha

    1234567890

  13. #73
    Classless Tard. BadKarma26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dry Land
    Posts
    6,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I'mOnlyHalfPolish
    hey karma what was the make of the .40's you fired?
    HK USP and Sig P2XX?

  14. #74
    Senior Member I'mOnlyHalfPolish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    how is the USP, it looks like a fiiiiiiiiiiine weapon, German made, cant go wrong, especially HK, but are they as smooth as they look? just too damn pricey...

  15. #75
    trying to be celibate Seraphim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Curing The Sick With My Noodley Appendage
    Posts
    13,606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by I'mOnlyHalfPolish
    how is the USP, it looks like a fiiiiiiiiiiine weapon, German made, cant go wrong, especially HK, but are they as smooth as they look? just too damn pricey...
    Oh its worth every penny.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •