Handgun procurement

[Hitman86]

Why not consider a USP compact in .40? You are familiar with it.

Too much money where I live can't find one new or used for under $675...But I did think about it lol

Well before I go buy anything I want to test it first so I'm going to the range on Friday and will see how they both shoot.

Like my first post said I'm not a big Glock fan boy for a couple of reasons. One they seem (no offense to anyone who owns one) a little to plain however this can be a good thing (less to break or go wrong), and a ton of people have a Glocks. I try not to jump into a trend if I can avoid it, however with that said I have heard nothing but good things regarding Glock and I will not rule it out because of some silly notion stuck in my head.

Oh the other reason that I kinda like the S&W MP 40c more is because it comes with a 10 round clip were the Glock 27 is only 9. But I will look into the finger plate extender as this would give me 11+1 rounds. Thanks for the advice I would love to hear more.

Oh and here is my first love


Followed closely by my newest addition (7 months old)

[CoastalJaegerEngineer]

My personal thoughts. I own a Glock 17C and I consider it to be a good handgun in its pricerange. I've also shot sig P228, CZ75B and HK USP 9mm. The Glock is not great. But its main strongpoint is simplicity. The drawbacks are: bulkyness around the grip due to hi cap doubble stacked magazines and a triggerpull that I find just horrible. The triggerpull is also a feature of the glock, Gaston probably figured out that the gun is supposed to be fired in high stress situations where the shooter doesen't pay much attention to the finess of the trigger anyways, so he stopped worrying about it and got drunk instead
In a way it's a good thing becase if you learn the glock triggerpull and stay on mark consistent, you can shoot so much more without any effort with a sig P228 for instance
The Glocks are also known for being reliable, but still I seem to have an issue with my 17C (doesen't eject the casing). It seems to occur more with one of the magazines then with the others and the freqency is around 5 per cent with 115 gr ammo and 1-2 per cent with 124 gr ammo. I suspect a weak magazine spring with the combination of a weak recoil spring and compensator for 115 gr loads. I'm going to try the magazine with both 115 gr and 147 gr load to see if there's difference in cycling. Next step would be to replace the magzine spring and find a recoil spring that is suitable for 115 gr CCI blazer Brass without any hickups. Any thoughts on this?

[Scrim]

What about the Walther PPS in .40 S&W? That thing is tiny.

I just messed around with one of them at the gun shop. I liked it alot, incredibly thin. I think it would make a great CCW.
For some reason Im craving a PPK. I know the calibre is a bit ****, but otherwise any thoughts on the PPK?

[gaijinsamurai]

For some reason Im craving a PPK. I know the calibre is a bit ****, but otherwise any thoughts on the PPK?

As a collector, I love the Walther PPK. But as a concealable personal defense weapon, I think a person can do better.

[ColinP]

I was in Cabela's in lacey Washington, they had Glock 26,27 SW M&P compacts and others for just under $500, they were used but looked in good shape.

[gaijinsamurai]

^ That's about the going rate for used Glocks. At my closest gunstore, used Glock 23s run about $450.

[Navel Lint]

I have had nothing but bad luck with S&W M&Ps. Mainly due to the feed ramps. The Glock 37 .45 GAP 10+1 is a great weapon. It's very comfortable to shoot and the GAP round hits just as hard as the ACP but allows for a better size grip. Although the 37 is full size, it seems a little easier to conceal than other. full size handguns. You can get one for $500 or less.

[ColinP]

^ That's about the going rate for used Glocks. At my closest gunstore, used Glock 23s run about $450.

I guess I am used to Canadian prices, add about $200 for used!


locopolicia

What are you using for ammo? My M&P seems to eat everything, if you make your own adjust the OAL of the round.

[orionhawk]

Since my last thread was closed that must mean I'm supposed to post this question here.

I have been thinking about getting a new CCW pistol as I carry around a Full Size USP .40 and it's getting to be a little more challenging then I would like.

Why not a Springfield Armory XD Subcompact?

I love mine. shoots like crazy, eats anything I feed it, and I can carry it all day.

[Hitman86]

Why not a Springfield Armory XD Subcompact?

I love mine. shoots like crazy, eats anything I feed it, and I can carry it all day.

Held a few of those not a fan, didn't feel comfortable in my hand. I know that it has to feel good as well as shoot good.

What caliber is yours chambered in?

[orionhawk]

Held a few of those not a fan, didn't feel comfortable in my hand. I know that it has to feel good as well as shoot good.

What caliber is yours chambered in?

.40S&W. might look at the new XD-M. grip's a different shape, and comes with interchangeable backstraps.

another interesting CCW pistol is the Springfield EMP: an M1911 re-engineered around the .40/9mm cartridge length, with a shorter frame rather than the usual magazine spacer. the .40 is steel, the 9 aluminum.
I have also carried a Taurus Millenium Pro PT145, a tiny DAO .45 (available in 9mm and .40 as well) that holds 10 rounds.

[Hitman86]

Thanks I will have to look into those when I go to my local gun shop next time.

[IMTT]

I have been tasked with T&E and adoption of transition training to the Glock 22, 40 Cal. pistol. I'm interested any deficiencies, malfunctions, problems and or concerns surrounding this weapon. If you have any input, information, suggestions or specific incidents which you can bring to light please post or send message. My agency is looking at purchasing over 1000 of these pistols for use. Any input you can provide will be great apperciated.

Respectfully

[IndyShark]

I have one and I find it easy to shoot, but not very accurate. I think I would look at a different pistol if I were buying a new one. I believe there are better options out there

[Lt-Col A. Tack]

Question for any knowledgeable person(s)

I'm contemplating purchasing a handgun (my first) and have had multiple gun owners recommend purchasing a revolver for my first handgun.

I been doing some research and I'd like to get any and all thoughts from the group on this particular candidate.

The gun below was featured in the March/April 2008 American Handgunner magazine: the Model 325 Thunder Ranch Revolver, .45 ACP

Model 325 Thunder Ranch Revolver



Model: 325
Caliber: .45ACP
Capacity: 6 Rounds
Action: Single/Double Action
Barrel Length: 4"
Front Sight: Interchangeable Gold Bead
Rear Sight: Adjustable White Outline
Overall Length: 9 1/2"
Weight Empty: 31 oz.
Grip: Synthetic
Material: Scandium Alloy Frame/Stainless Steel Cylinder
Finish: Matte Black

The article was very favorable.

But I have read comments in an online forum that suggest this gun requires the cartridges be loaded into moon clips. Something to do with the headspace. Is this so?

This contradicts information in the article, which says the gun can be fired using loose ammo.

Can any affirm or contradict this problem? Should I be looking at another revolver?