Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 23456789101112131415 LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 221

Thread: The F-4 Phantom II Turns 50

  1. #136
    Senior Member BlackFlag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hockeytown
    Posts
    4,047

    Default

    I personally think it is one of the most intimidating planes ever produced. It looks like a big flying Spade.

  2. #137
    Senior Member santana's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Some where in the Land of Sacré Coeur
    Posts
    8,745

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chefjavier View Post
    Does anyone know how the F-4 did Air to Air with the Vietnam Mig-15, and Mig-21?
    With both the Phantom perform well, but the was a leak. initialy the phantom was designed without a cannon. After the first dogfights in the Vietnam skies the and the weakness of the air to air missiles the pilots recomended to the desigers the need of a cannon. First they desing a Cannon Pod under the Phantom fuselage (GAU-4 20mm Vulcan
    M61A1/M61A2 20mm Automatic Gun), later this same cannon system was colocated under the F-4 nose.

    Here a few Phantom pictures







    GAU-4 20mm Vulcan
    M61A1/M61A2 20mm Automatic Gun

    Link:
    http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/equip/m61.htm

  3. #138
    Senior Member Dling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    2,092

    Default

    Lots of guns:


  4. #139
    Senior Member chefjavier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,985

    Default

    Santana:
    Like always thanks for the information and pictures. I love the potrait of the Japanese Sun. Do you know the squadron?

  5. #140
    Senior Member Dling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    2,092

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chefjavier View Post
    Santana:
    Like always thanks for the information and pictures. I love the potrait of the Japanese Sun. Do you know the squadron?
    VF-111 Sundowners

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VF-111

  6. #141
    Senior Member chefjavier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,985

    Default

    Awesome! Great Pictures!!!!!!!

  7. #142
    Senior Member santana's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Some where in the Land of Sacré Coeur
    Posts
    8,745

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dling View Post
    Correct



    A McDonnellDouglas F-4B Phantom II (BuNo 149430) of fighter squadron VF-111 Sundowners about to be launched from the aircraft carrier USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) during a deployment to Vietnam in 1971/72. The F-4B is armed with AIM-9D Sidewinder missiles and Mk 82 (500 lb/227 kg) bombs. The relatively small weapons load was typical for Coral Sea due to the limited catapult capacity.


    The tail of a US NavyF-14A Tomcat, belonging to VF-111, the "Sundowners".

  8. #143
    Senior Member chefjavier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,985

    Default

    Santana did the F-14 had the tiger theme painted in the front?

  9. #144
    Senior Member santana's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Some where in the Land of Sacré Coeur
    Posts
    8,745

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chefjavier View Post
    Santana did the F-14 had the tiger theme painted in the front?
    yes, I seen several plastic models that it had so, But its tiger theme or Shark them?

    A link

    http://www.topedge.com/alley/squadron/pac/vf111his.htm

    an F-14 from the VF-111 Squadron


    VF-111 F-14A firing a Phoenix

  10. #145
    Senior Member santana's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Some where in the Land of Sacré Coeur
    Posts
    8,745

    Default


  11. #146
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    good old blighty
    Posts
    195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chefjavier View Post
    Does anyone know how the F-4 did Air to Air with the Vietnam Mig-15, and Mig-21?
    The phantom did well considering both were lighter dogfighters and the phantom weighed more than both together.

    The general consensus with is the phantom would have done better if it had a gun earlier (and in all models) as the missile fired to kill ratios were enormous.

    But considering what it was up against it could have been worse.

    curlyboy

  12. #147
    Member Stainless Steel Rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    About 10 miles from the Saturn 5B
    Posts
    727

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    To me, an F15 or F16 looks the part of a scalpel or razor......the F4 Phantom looks like a bloody sledgehammer.
    Love it and concur wholeheartedly. Kinda like what Tom Clancy said about the AH-64 Apache copter "You are not going to see this in the sky doing the traffic reports."

    I lived in St. Louis, MO in the 1980's-90's and used to drive out to watch flight operations at Lambert St. Louis airport. There was a lot right at the end of the runway (now gone due to airport expansion). We plane lovers would occasionally see a F-16 or -18 leave from the Boeing facility there, but when the National guard took off in their F-4's, two-by-two, growling, snarling, SCREAMING over our heads....well, it was special.

    F-4's, BUFFS and Hueys; aircraft that span the generations.

  13. #148
    Senior Member Breakfast in Vegas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Reflecting on life at Narcism Pond.
    Posts
    12,825

    Default

    The aircraft simply looks badazz.

  14. #149
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    101

    Default RE: The F-4 Phantom II Turns 50

    Quote Originally Posted by chefjavier View Post
    Does anyone know how the F-4 did Air to Air with the Vietnam Mig-15, and Mig-21?

    Quote Originally Posted by curlyboy View Post
    The phantom did well considering both were lighter dogfighters and the phantom weighed more than both together.
    The general consensus with is the phantom would have done better if it had a gun earlier (and in all models) as the missile fired to kill ratios were enormous.
    curlyboy
    True, the F-4 would have had a higher kill ratio had it had a cannon from the beginning but, that was not the trend back then. The MiG-21 was designed without a cannon! So was the Mirage III initially but, in the design (unlike the Phantom) provisions were made to make the cannon a part of the fighter in the future full production models.
    The Soviet AF was the first to change their minds due to the poor performance of their missiles. The French soon added cannons to the Mirage III for one thing, the IsAF refused to purchase Mirage III's without a cannon. It proved to be a large factor for Israel's air superiority in its conflicts with Arab neighbors. The F-4 was the last of the three to have a cannon and it wasn't until the 1968 bombing halt over North Viet Nam, after the Ault Report came out along with some data the USAF had compiled. During the 'halt' the USAF concentrated on hardware improvements (hardware, radars, etc.) in their effort to improve their kill ratio. "Steve" Ritchie said, he came back from second tour in Viet Nam as an ace then got DACT/ACM training! Yeah, he became an ace on his instincts as a pilot. The USN focused during the bombing halt on the training aspect of aerial combat performance and showed a significant improvement in the low kill ratio (as pointed out by the Ault Report). To that end, they started TOP GUN.
    When the bombing halt, over the North stopped.... initially the USAF's kill ratio dropped to almost 1:1, for two months then went up, despite weapon's improvements! The USN's TOP GUN focused on the training and their kill ratio zoomed up immediately to 13:1!!

    I looked at the statistics at ACIG, for the data on aerial kills over Viet Nam. Before the bombing halt (approximately) 44 of the 120 kills were with cannons -36.6%. True these were A-1's, F-8's, F-100's, F-105's making the kills. All the other kills were with missiles. After the bombing halts, only 9 of the 108 kills were with cannons -all USAF! The big difference was because the bulk of the kills were by the F-4 Phantoms and the effects of TOP GUN. Another large factor F-4's replacing the F-8's, F-105's, and the USAF's efforts on hardware improvements was also helping.

    There are videos of the F-4 being used by the Blue Angels! URL;
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX1-I...eature=related

    What ever faults that were perceived in the F-4 Phantom 2, using the proper tactics made the F-4 competitive in ACM with any fighter of that time.

    ACIG Stats URL;
    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/
    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_243.shtml ___ Part #1 US Kills Over Viet Nam
    http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_244.shtml ___ Part #2

    Enjoy -Adrian

  15. #150
    Senior Member -Max2-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    an obscure forum
    Posts
    2,154

    Default

    Wow cant believe this thread is still alive...



    Some Vietnam F-4 "MiG Killers" artworks :


    The famous VF-96 F-4J, callsign "Showtime 100", flown by Randy Cunningham and Willie Drescoll on 10 May 1972. They got their third, fourth and fifth MiG kills (3x MiG-17s downed in a single day) in this aircraft but unfortunately were shootdown by a SA-2 SAM just a few minutes after. They ejected over the South China Sea and were rescued.


    F-4D flown by John Madden and Chuck Debellevue shooting down a pair of MiG-19s on 9 September 1972.


    VF-161 F-4B in a dogfight with a NVAF MiG-19.


    Steve Ritchie's F-4E shooting down its second MiG on 8 July 1972.


    Colonel Robin Olds F-4C.


    Robin Olds F-4C rolling on a MiG-21 during Operation Bolo in 1967.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •