Page 47 of 425 FirstFirst ... 3739404142434445464748495051525354555797147 ... LastLast
Results 691 to 705 of 6371

Thread: Rafale News

  1. #691

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tidls View Post
    Actually, the original Hornet is better suited for dogfights than the Super Hornet. It is faster, maintains E better, has faster acceleration and higher turn rates.

    Well, according to the guys that fly them anyways.

    But ths SH is a superior BVR platform as it is relevant in the quoted example...

    I doubt that the SH should waited to come to visual range to detect a rafale. they are certainly talking about BVR...I hope for the SH otherwise I will have doubt over its radar capabilities !

  2. #692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    But ths SH is a superior BVR platform as it is relevant in the quoted example...

    I doubt that the SH should waited to come to visual range to detect a rafale. they are certainly talking about BVR...I hope for the SH otherwise I will have doubt over its radar capabilities !
    I'm aware that the Super Hornet is a better machine in BVR compared to the original Hornet. I also believe they're talking BVR. The Rafale is more than a match for the Super Hornet. BVR or WVR.

  3. #693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    To know the ROE is always better I agree...But if you want to know everything each time you won't debate on anything.

    So it is not perfect as we don't know the ROE, but that is not a reason to dodge the debate.

    If this encounter was totally irrelevant because of execissvely restrictive ROE then that would't be brought as an example in a technical evaluation.
    I bet The FAB has enough experts to understand this problematic.

    I found facinating that each time there is sometning which doesn't fit your opinion then some people will fight to descredit the fact finding all the "what if ?" possibilities. We should take it as it is : not a perfect information as we don't know the ROE but still a valid point as it was taken into account by the FAB.

    Personally, I doubt most members would consider asking for the ROE or how the aircraft were equipped. As being out of line or unreasonable???

  4. #694
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    Breeman,

    rafale was opposed to the Super Hornet while the gripen was opposed to the hornet. That a totally different generation...

    This is quite a difference in radar, MMI, SA, RCS etc etc perfromance.

    One of the last rafale encounter against the Super Hornet was against the Block2...mind you with AESA and everything !
    Like I said, nothing but good on Rafale. However in the same way I point out that Gripen has been flying everything from Red Flag Alaska to NATO exercises in Europe. This summer Sweden hosted Loyal Arrow exercise with 8 participating countries and 50 aircrafts (F-15, F-16, F/A-18 etc.).

    That a totally different generation...
    I'm personally not a fan of the idea of calling it generation shifts when it's upgrades within the same plane type. Same mechanisms as in gender shifts, the doctor might shift some parts but the DNA is still there.

  5. #695
    Senior Member Rapier55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    One of the last rafale encounter against the Super Hornet was against the Block2...mind you with AESA and everything !
    Which encounter was that? The one where the F-18 pilot's radar was almost useless until it was too "late?"

  6. #696
    Senior Member oldsoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Turning gold into sh*t
    Posts
    9,226

    Default

    Spectra ECM is beyond doubt very good - possibly the best in Europe. However, I'm surprised that the US would expose the family jewels to the French as I'm told they are reluctant to use the full range of modes in training with allies. Were'nt they very suspicous of Rafales in red flag - even accusing them of electronically snooping ?
    Also - would the French want to expose their hand ?

  7. #697
    Senior Member Hyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    8,342

    Default

    ^^ "expose their hand"

    The French have nothing to lose, they have a great fighter which builds on the experience of 50 years in fighter building, it is underestimated at times (I don't even get why) so they have something to prove, their pilots will use the fullest spectrum of the plane and will show that paper-stats are not more important than how the plane acts when in the air. I am in no way surprised that/if the Rafale "owns" every other fighter in the air, if it didn't it would be just as good as the Mirage-2000, but it has to be better, so naturally it will have an upper hand against all planes comparable to the Mirage-2000 and from the same age as the Mirage-2000. They have something to prove and it looks like they do.

  8. #698

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rapier55 View Post
    Which encounter was that? The one where the F-18 pilot's radar was almost useless until it was too "late?"
    The latest reported Block2 vs rafale confrontation was WVR so nothing extraordinnary. Rafale and SH often practise of the french mediteranean coast. french navy has a base in southern france (Nīmes Garon) to meet SH.

    French Rafale on the Teddy" ~ The special report of Rafale M F2's performance during the JTFEX exercise, 2008.

    1. In Page 37, a photo shows a Rafale M of 12F flew with an F/A-18F from the Blacklions Squadron, the first frontline squadron of Superhornet Block II.


    2. Rafale M F2 met with F/A-18E/F in several 1 v 1 BFM and 2 v 2 AA missions during the exercise. However, both sides didn't show their real and complete fighting capability to each other ~ US pilots didn't show the true capability of JHMCS + AIM-9X to French pilots, while 12F was also shy about showing the real capabilities of RBE2 radar, Spectra EWS, and FSO optronic systems.


    3. A USN pilot's (Lt Mike Tremel, pilot of VFA-31 "Tomcatters") comments for Rafale M:

    "A highly maneuverable fighter with an incredible capacity to point its nose in every direction in the sky."

    "The French pilots seem to be happy to its flight performance and its modern cockpit design".

    When asked if he would like to swap his Super hornet to a Rafale --> "No, I love my Super Bug way too much...."


    4. A French pilot's (pilot of 12F) comments for F/A-18E:

    "A great bombing aircraft, but not a fighter for dogfighting."

    "Its acceleration capability in the high angle of incidence is not good."

    "Rafale is definitely the more nimble one."

    "However, F/A-18E has already equipped the JHMCS + AIM-9X, a combination of decisive edge in close-range encounters ~ Although the tactics to counter it have existed now."

  9. #699
    Senior Member oldsoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Turning gold into sh*t
    Posts
    9,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MareCar View Post
    ^^ "expose their hand"

    The French have nothing to lose, they have a great fighter which builds on the experience of 50 years in fighter building, it is underestimated at times (I don't even get why) so they have something to prove, their pilots will use the fullest spectrum of the plane and will show that paper-stats are not more important than how the plane acts when in the air. I am in no way surprised that/if the Rafale "owns" every other fighter in the air, if it didn't it would be just as good as the Mirage-2000, but it has to be better, so naturally it will have an upper hand against all planes comparable to the Mirage-2000 and from the same age as the Mirage-2000. They have something to prove and it looks like they do.
    - because ECM is exceptionally sensitive ? It is one of the things whose real capability you just dont expose on training missions with foreign aircraft ( apart from a training mode ) - and certainly not to commercial rivals !

  10. #700
    Senior Member Rapier55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    The latest reported Block2 vs rafale confrontation was WVR so nothing extraordinnary. Rafale and SH often practise of the french mediteranean coast. french navy has a base in southern france (Nīmes Garon) to meet SH.
    Thanks for the clarification. I was going to be quite shocked, not at the capabilities of the Rafale but how completely crippled a Block II SH can become in the BVR realm.

  11. #701
    Senior Member Hyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    8,342

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldsoak View Post
    - because ECM is exceptionally sensitive ? It is one of the things whose real capability you just dont expose on training missions with foreign aircraft ( apart from a training mode ) - and certainly not to commercial rivals !
    Ah, that's what you mean. Can't they turn it off, or is it an integral part of the exercise?

  12. #702
    Senior Member oldsoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Turning gold into sh*t
    Posts
    9,226

    Default

    AFAIK theres various modes you can deploy - its not an all or nothing. You have to also bear in mind the potential effect of jamming on civil radar or exercise control radar, so you have to tailor it to the exercise.
    Radars can also use various techniques to reduce the effect of jamming or deception - so they dont get used to their full potential in friendly engagements in case data falls into unfriendly hands.

  13. #703

    Default

    Another rafale vs SH confrontation report from dassault fox 3 magazine.

    No real detail but it seems that they have done some BVR:

    The whole spectrum of combat missions was simulated, from self-escort strike to close air support, and from basic fighter manoeuvring to air-defence. For strike or close air support scenarios, we simulated attacks with loads of six AASM stand-off, fire-and-forget modular air-to-surface armaments, or six GBU-12 laserguided bombs, plus a full-up air-to-air load of Mica radar and infrared-guided missiles. On most missions, we had US Navy adversary units in Oceana or US Air Force fighters trying to oppose our ingress. That was very realistic training in a different environment for us.”

  14. #704
    Senior Member Olybrius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,161

    Default

    Brazil, UAE , Kuwait ..not Switzerland ?

    France is 'optimistic' about sale of Rafale to Brazil
    PARIS, 16 dez 2009 (AFP) -PARIS, Dec. 16, 2009 (AFP)

    French Defense Minister, Herve Morin, said he was "very optimistic" about the possibility to export the Rafale fighter jets, Dassault Aviation, a number of countries, including Brazil, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.

    In an interview with French newspaper La Tribune, Morin said: "As you know, we have advanced discussions with United Arab Emirates, Brazil and also with other countries", and "I'm optimistic."

    "In relation to Brazil, we work in a great confidence, because our relations are part of a larger strategic partnership for our countries."

    "A contract of this scope does not end in a few weeks," said Morin, noting that it is "normal further discussions" with the Brazilian government.
    Dassault competes with Boeing (F-18/Super Horn) and Sweden's Saab (Gripen) for the sale of 36 fighter jets to the FAB, in a deal valued at $ 7 billion.
    .Although President Luiz Inįcio Lula da Silva expressed his preference for the Rafale, Brazil has not yet decided on the purchase of fighter planes.

    http://economia.uol.com.br/ultimas-n...ao-brasil.jhtm

  15. #705
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    13,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arthuro View Post
    french navy has a base in southern france (Nīmes Garon) to meet SH.
    Hyeres navy air base is even closer to Toulon and the mediteran sea

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •