"We have been involved in an anti-terror conflict in Northern Ireland for over 30 years."
and
"Biz - I was making my point from a UK view."
Take it easy "Royal"... give sources, and reasons, when you start to push your own agenda on this board please. You'll be brought up short.
As for this comment:
"Expansion can only mean lower standards."
Ridiculous. Expansion could mean higher budgets, encouraging operators to stay in and train new recruits longer. Higher budgets would trickle down to attract a higher quality of recruit (pay grades) and encourage others to stay in longer.
I say "could".
"The current thinking is a two tier SF. Current standards for 'black Ops' ie CT work, and a lower standard group for 'green Ops' ie war fighting. There are suggestions that a Para Bn will be re-rolled in line with the US Rangers as some kind of SF support force, in line with the way they worked in with the hostage rescue of the 1RIR troops held Sierra Leone by the 'West Side Boys'."
What sources can you cite for these claims about a "two tier SF" in the British Army? Where did you hear about "suggestions that a Para Bn will be re-rolled in line with the US Rangers as some kind of SF support force"?
Surely these sources must be open source as you are posting on a public BBS?
cheers
front


Reply With Quote




