Page 2 of 193 FirstFirst 123456789101252102 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 2895

Thread: Germany's Afghanistan Contingent News and Discussions Thread

  1. #16
    buck duck huck luck muck puck ruck suck tuck yuck fuuuuuuuu muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Beim Barte des Proleten!
    Posts
    13,941

    Default

    A German soldier in Afghanistan has died from natural causes.

    Rest in Peace.



    In addition to that, a joint German and Afghan patrol was "repeatedly" ambushed northwards off Kunduz and "repelled" the attacks with force. No casualties among allied troops were reported.

  2. #17
    Senior Member Silent Reader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TravelingHomeless View Post
    40% is alot higher than i had imagined it to be. If the German government were to formally announce the mission as a counter insurgency mission and to "**** off" the peacekeeping pretension, could support rise or drop? I figure with the 1,000 troop increase, those of which will be infantry troops mainly or just logistic/support? And are KSK numbers included in the troop numbers?

    I think a bit of both but mostly non-combat troops. i once read (don't remember where) that the 3500 limit was so narrow that they had to withdraw firefighters etc from their bases in order to be able to put up the Quick Reaction Force. So a few hundred of the additional 1000 troops would be troops that should already be there (logistics, firefighter etc) but are in fact not because the current mandate is to small.
    Then there is a discussion about contributing personal to the planned AWACS mission over Afghanistan... i guess these would also fall in this mandate. besides this the politicians said they only want to sent about 700 additional troops with the other 300 being reserves.

    So I wouldn't expect to much in terms of combat troops from the new mandate

  3. #18
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    124

    Default

    Good Summary. Even thow I don't think KSK soldiers died. Sorry, but I can't imagine all families would keep silence about that. Thats impossibel in our country

    And for the drugs: Nobody forces our people to take drugs. So what, there are some more drugs produced, but it has never been a problem to get them before... .

  4. #19
    member MajorTom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mars, mightiest of planets
    Posts
    258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muck View Post
    Your answer was massively contradictory, I'm surprised that you did not spot it on your own. You've just admitted that the Taliban could actually attack Germany if given a reason (by Germany continuing the war against them).
    If you read it again, you ll notice I did not mention Taliban doing the strike.
    Some wannabe terrorists who are offended because their "brothers" are killed by the BW could do it by themselves.
    Taliban/Afghans are only minding their own business in A-stan and fighting the foreign troops in there like they have done hundreds of years. In the long run all foreign armies had to leave the place. Same is going to happen again. Thus its waste of money, men and prestige.

    Hopefully your politicians do the right decisions in this difficult situation and the soldiers of the BW does not pay too high price of the involvement.

    Viel Glück Kameraden!

  5. #20
    Pretty in Pink seventy6er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    Hopefully your politicians do the right decisions in this difficult situation and the soldiers of the BW does not pay too high price of the involvement.

    Viel Glück Kameraden!
    Where are you from, Major Tom?

  6. #21
    buck duck huck luck muck puck ruck suck tuck yuck fuuuuuuuu muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Beim Barte des Proleten!
    Posts
    13,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    Some wannabe terrorists who are offended because their "brothers" are killed by the BW could do it by themselves.
    And you buy that they would dain to leave us in peace if we withdrew after we had already killed their brothers?
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    Taliban/Afghans are only minding their own business in A-stan and fighting the foreign troops in there like they have done hundreds of years.
    The Taliban as a political and military movement have not even been existing for twenty years, how come they did the fighting for "hundreds of years" in your eyes? Additionally - even if you do not want to hear it - the Afghan and the Taliban stance towards the presence of foreign troops is a different kettle of fish. Most Afghans support foreign troops, why at all should they be for the Taliban anyway? Large parts of the Afghan population are not of Pashtun descent, so they were oppressed by the Taliban during the brief period they ruled the country.
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    In the long run all foreign armies had to leave the place.
    A basic knowledge in history makes me think different. The British defeated the Afghans crushlingy in the Second Anglo-Afghan War and left the country after they had achieved all of their aims. Other armies were successfull as well when they employed determined tactics.
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    Same is going to happen again.
    Again, how can you be that sure.
    Quote Originally Posted by MajorTom View Post
    Thus its waste of money, men and prestige.
    Please elaborate if you don't mind. I've pointed out the reasons before why I don't regard theses aspects as valid arguments.

  7. #22
    member MajorTom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Mars, mightiest of planets
    Posts
    258

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seventy6er View Post
    Where are you from, Major Tom?
    Mars, mightiest of planets.

    Muck,

    We could continue this for eternity. All is said already and the future ll tell how it vent.
    Last edited by MajorTom; 08-26-2008 at 10:19 AM.

  8. #23
    buck duck huck luck muck puck ruck suck tuck yuck fuuuuuuuu muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Beim Barte des Proleten!
    Posts
    13,941

    Default

    Two dead and ten wounded in three weeks. The situation has become nasty for us, too.

  9. #24
    Senior Member Silent Reader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    31
    Posts
    5,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muck View Post
    Two dead and ten wounded in three weeks. The situation has become nasty for us, too.

    But one of the dead didn't die because of hostile actions and wasn't even in Afghanistan at the time. But still the situation is far from improving.

  10. #25
    buck duck huck luck muck puck ruck suck tuck yuck fuuuuuuuu muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Beim Barte des Proleten!
    Posts
    13,941

    Default

    A poll of conservative daily "Die Welt"

    "Should Germany send more troops to Afghanistan?"

    Yes - 13%
    No - 11 %
    Germany should not deploy troops to other countries at all - 76%


    'Nuff said.

  11. #26
    Riot Controller variable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    obscure forum
    Posts
    2,555

    Default

    Thank god we don't have plebiscites in such situations in Germany.

    The common German might have an opinion on everything but certainly not the farsight to decide things that important

  12. #27
    Senior Member Mackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Stuttgart
    Posts
    5,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by muck View Post
    A poll of conservative daily "Die Welt"

    "Should Germany send more troops to Afghanistan?"

    Yes - 13%
    No - 11 %
    Germany should not deploy troops to other countries at all - 76%


    'Nuff said.
    In the 80s the question would be "Should Germany keep his own military?"
    Yes - 30%
    No - 70 %

    So it's still a good progress.

  13. #28
    Member Fuschimuschi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hannover
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mackie View Post
    In the 80s the question would be "Should Germany keep his own military?"
    Yes - 30%
    No - 70 %

    So it's still a good progress.
    Lol. I guess you're right.

  14. #29
    buck duck huck luck muck puck ruck suck tuck yuck fuuuuuuuu muck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Beim Barte des Proleten!
    Posts
    13,941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by variable View Post
    Thank god we don't have plebiscites in such situations in Germany.

    The common German might have an opinion on everything but certainly not the farsight to decide things that important
    You've named it. Ordinary Germans always ask themselves why the government is not listening to them in similiar situations, but how could you trust people who do not even know the name of their own president?

  15. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TravelingHomeless View Post
    40% is alot higher than i had imagined it to be. If the German government were to formally announce the mission as a counter insurgency mission and to "**** off" the peacekeeping pretension, could support rise or drop?
    Drop, fast. Both in the general population and among parliament members.

    Currently, two parties (Greens and Left) are calling for the troops to be withdrawn, collecting 104 out of 610 seats in parliament behind them - so the mandate is rather safe at the moment. Presumably the next mandate approval will get less than the 453 votes in favour that the last got.

    Quote Originally Posted by muck View Post
    An unbeatable argument, the money. Germany is spending ridiculously little sums on the redevelopment in Afghanistan.
    Something that everyone can be accused of; additionally, most money flowing into Afghanistan is swallowed up in corruption and primarily Western companies vastly overcharging for construction there.

    Germany is currently investing about 200-250 million Euro into Afghanistan per year. Unlike certain other donators, this German money however is not invested primarily into CMC construction projects, i.e. streets, bridges and airports to support the military effort. Especially in RC(E), the amount of this CMC construction is outright ridiculous, and all paid for with "aid money", without the Afghan government having a say in that.

    Germany remains the second-largest development aid donator worldwide btw, after the USA, and significantly ahead of the UK, France and Japan.

    Quote Originally Posted by muck View Post
    but never Heroin from Afghanistan.
    Afghan heroin has significantly dropped market prices in Germany, flushing the market over the last 5 years.
    Depending on where you are in Germany, the market is vastly different though. Both Heroin and cocaine are ruling the streets only in the bigger cities, in other places it's currently primarily amphetamines, and to some extent acid; cannabis selling anywhere of course, and being rather widespread.
    So, unless you're in Frankfurt or Munich, your dealer won't have Black Afghan in his portfolio anyway.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •