Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Who's Really in Power in Pakistan?

  1. #1
    Senior Member LaoSexMachine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    20,211

    Default Who's Really in Power in Pakistan?

    Who's Really in Power in Pakistan?

    A Guide to the Leading Players in the Post-Musharraf Pakistan

    By NICK SCHIFRIN

    ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, Aug. 22, 2008 —

    In a crucible of violence, a young and vulnerable Pakistani government is trying to turn President Pervez Musharraf's resignation into a stable democracy in which civilians control the military and provide economic stability.
    The fractious coalition represents the third attempt in Paksitan's 62-year history to replace a military rule with a civilian government, and never before have politicians proved they can be less corrupt and more effective than generals.
    But this government faces not only unprecedented inflation (nearly 25 percent) and tumultuous politics but also a resurgent Taliban.
    On Thursday and Friday, at least four suicide bombers targeted the military, including two that successfully pierced security at the country's largest ammunition factory, to kill at least 67 people.
    "It is an extremely difficult situation. It is a make-or-break situation for Pakistan," says Rasul Bakhsh Rais, a political science professor at the Lahore University of Management Studies. "This is about Pakistan's ability to survive as a state."
    Pervez Musharraf became unpopular in part because he was seen as doing the United States' bidding in the volatile Northwest Frontier province, where he launched a series of offensives against militants who use the area as a base to attack targets in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
    But the current coalition government has been forced to follow many of the same tactics. At first, it made peace with the militants, but the Frontier Corps paramilitary forces continued to be targeted, and the provincial government said it had no choice but to confront an increasingly powerful Taliban.
    As the prime minister's interior adviser put it this week, either the country can hand itself over to the Taliban, or the military can continue to fight. "The war against terrorism is our own war, and it will continue until its logical end," Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilan told reporters this week.
    Taliban spokesmen promised to attack the heart of Pakistani authority in retaliation, and over the last few weeks they have proved that, most notably in the dual suicide bombings Thursday inside the Wah Containment, where the country's largest ammunition factory resides.
    "They can penetrate anywhere now. That is what they're trying to prove," says retired Gen. Talat Masood, a former secretary of defense and the longest-running chairman of the ammunition factory. He says it was once "the safest and most secure place." But today, the Taliban are "intensifying their attacks, and the frequency is also increasing, and they're becoming sophisticated."
    The United States is worried that the coalition government, which is preoccupied with internal battles and choosing a president, can't withstand internal pressures and will give up the fight against the militants.
    It will be even harder to get whatever civilians are in place in Islamabad to focus on terrorism, to focus on insurgency, when they're so focused either on political squabbling or on the question of who will govern Pakistan, says Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
    So who are the leading players in the post-Musharraf Pakistan? Here's a handy cheat sheet.
    Asif Ali Zardari, co-chairman, Pakistan People's Party
    The man who would be president. Zardari is Benazir Bhutto's widower and the head of the country's most popular political party, which she led and her father created. He was once called "Mister 10 percent," accused of skimming off the top of every deal he touched. Today he would be in charge of the country's third attempt to transition from military to civilian leadership.
    If he becomes president, as many analysts predict, "it would be an executive presidency," as Rais put it. The prime minster, officially the head of the government, would not hold significant power. Zardari would need to insulate himself constitutionally from judges throwing out the National Reconciliation Order, which gave Zardari amnesty from corruption charges late last year.
    Nawaz Sharif, Chairman, Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz
    The head of the country's second-largest party, he was the driving force behind the move to remove Musharraf from power. Sharif was on his second tour as prime minister when Musharraf took power in a 1999 coup.
    His party has repeatedly threatened to leave the coalition government if the PPP does not agree to reinstate the 60 judges who Musharraf fired late last year. His support of Zardari depends on an agreement on the judges.
    "He's already indicated to Zardari, 'We will support you," says Rais. "His only condition would be that the judiciary is restored."
    If Sharif chooses to leave the coalition, the PPP could still lead a coalition without the PML-N.
    General Ashfaq Kiyani, Chief of Staff, Pakistani Army
    The military is still the most influential and powerful institution in the country, and Kiyani is by some measure the most influential and powerful man in the country. But unlike Musharraf, who installed him in this post last year, Kiyani is trying to stay out of politics and wants the politicians to take ownership of the government.
    He has made 2008 "the year of the soldier," an attempt to improve Pakistanis' opinions of the military, opinions that have dropped as Musharraf blurred the line between army and government. And it is an attempt to refocus the military itself on an incredibly difficult problem: rooting out the Taliban, so long as that's what it is asked to do.
    "The military realizes its own limitations," Masood says. "Because of the rise of militancy within Pakistan, and at the same time the strong alienation of the people of Pakistan against the military. This is why they're even prepared to tolerate a weak civilian dispensation, provided they feel eventually, it will start delivering."
    Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan
    Last year was the most violent in Pakistan's history since its bloody partition from India in 1947. Fifty-six bombings killed more than 600 people, most notably, Benazir Bhutto. It was after the military's operation against radical, religious students in Islamabad when the Tehrik-e-Taliban -- the Movement of Pakistani Taliban -- launched a violent campaign under the leadership of a militant from Waziristan named Baitullah Mehsud.
    A wave of attacks -- Pakistan's first repeated use of suicide bombings -- targeted police, the military and politicians. The attacks largely stopped when the current government signed peace deals with various factions, but in the last few months the Taliban has resumed its attacks on Frontier Corps soldiers, and as the military has responded, the suicide bombings have returned.
    The Taliban today "poses a greater threat to U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan than at any time in the last seven years," Bruce Reidel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former CIA officer, wrote this week. "Ironically, Pakistan is the logistical hub for both the Taliban which operates from safe havens in Pakistan, and NATO which gets more than 80 percent of its supplies via the Pakistani port of Karachi."
    The U.S. and Afghanistan both believe the stronger the Taliban in Pakistan are, the more U.S. soldiers will die.
    "The fight against terrorism is not in Afghanistan, and we will not be secure and safe & unless Afghanistan and the international community address the question of sanctuaries in Pakistan and the terrorist training camps there," Afghan President Hamid Karzai said this week.
    Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, former Supreme Court Chief Justice
    The beginning of the end for President Pervez Musharraf was when he fired Chaudhry last spring. In response, the general, who had a nearly 70 percent approval rating, suddenly found protestors outside his door. A "lawyer's movement" was hatched, giving many people in Paksitan the confidence to speak out against Musharraf.
    "The movement started with a single judge," Rais says.
    Today, he is at the center of the power politics between Zardari and Sharif. Sharif insists that all the deposed judges need to be reinstated, especially Chaudhry.
    Zardari fears that if Chaudhry is reinstated he might declare that the National Reconciliation Order, which provided him immunity from prosecution, was unconstitutional.
    Asfandyar Wali and Maulana Fazlur Rehman
    President, Awami National Party and Chairman, Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-F political party
    These two senior politicians are the buffer between Zardari and Sharif. If Sharif remains in the coalition and the judges are restored, Pakistanis will have these two men to thank.
    Wali's party, a national Pashtun party, controls the Northwest Frontier province. He is a favorite of the United States and oversees the areas of Pakistan in which the United States is most interested.
    Rehman's party used to run the Northwest Frontier, and still holds sway the country's religious parties.
    Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani
    Officially, the most powerful man in government. But much of the power rests with Zardari himself already. And if Zardari becomes President, Gilani "would largely be a figurehead," Rais says.

  2. #2
    Falcons FTW Kilgor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Joh Country
    Posts
    13,503

    Default

    Who's got the suitcase with the nuclear codes in it ?

  3. #3
    domesticated wildcat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cellin cat iz watchin yor threadz ∑:3
    Posts
    9,483

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kilgor View Post
    Who's got the suitcase with the nuclear codes in it ?
    that is the worrying part.

  4. #4
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Serious TR1 is serious.
    Posts
    9,903

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kilgor View Post
    Who's got the suitcase with the nuclear codes in it ?
    Do they even have a suitcase with the nuclear codes in it?

  5. #5
    Falcons FTW Kilgor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Joh Country
    Posts
    13,503

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheRussian1 View Post
    Do they even have a suitcase with the nuclear codes in it?
    Yes, there was a picture of Musharraf at a swearing in ceremony and a suitcase said to contain the codes/whatever.

  6. #6
    Reported.....For not reporting T3ngu sooner Alfacentori's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Resident Misanthrope
    Posts
    4,385

    Default

    I would say the people with the power would the people with the most guns, that would be the army then!

    The question then becomes what do the army want and what will they do?

    How inflitrated are they with extremist beliefs/leanings?

    Do they know the combination for the suitcase?

    These are all worrying questions.

    Alfa

  7. #7
    Senior Member Bringer of Greater Things's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,837

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfacentori View Post
    I would say the people with the power would the people with the most guns, that would be the army then!

    The question then becomes what do the army want and what will they do?

    How inflitrated are they with extremist beliefs/leanings?

    Do they know the combination for the suitcase?

    These are all worrying questions.

    Alfa

    Actually, the army would be the least infiltrated by extremists.

  8. #8
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,961

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kilgor View Post
    Yes, there was a picture of Musharraf at a swearing in ceremony and a suitcase said to contain the codes/whatever.
    That is the suitcase looking bulletproof shield, If I am not wrong, Pakistan still doesnt have that kind of Secure Network Integration.

  9. #9
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,961

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by There is no tomorrow View Post
    Actually, the army would be the least infiltrated by extremists.
    Nope, not since Zia has had anything to do with it.
    Pakistan is not that black and white, and moreover the friendly forces are far far less than we can ever fathom.

  10. #10
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,961

    Default

    The Army is thoroughly controlled by the ISI, The current Army Chief,was priorly the ISI Chief.

  11. #11
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezekiel25:17 View Post
    Who's Really in Power in Pakistan?
    That will be determined by whichever party is acceptable to the United States.

    It is significant that more than five years after military efforts to counter terrorism
    commenced in Afghanistan, there is no rule of law in Waziristan, Western Pakistan.

    http://south-waziristan-news.newslib.com/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •