I haven't seen those ones either. Good post.
I haven't seen those ones either. Good post.
Thanks for those promo pictures. They're pretty neat actually. I was a little faster than you with those combat camera pictures - they're part of my post just one page earlier.
PS: Never unprepared isn't a double negative (because unprepared is one word, unlike 'not prepared')
Thanks AnoSynum for the previous posts!
I remember seeing a video on this on the Army website, it's some snipers from R22eR training with some new rappelling kit/method. Might have just been some unit run training, not a Basic Sniper course.
*edited to add link to video
http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/land-te...ng.asp?id=5799
Last edited by Skeletor-; 12-30-2012 at 05:32 PM.
If they go with that new helmet system, I am going to find the one responsible and sh1t in his boots.
That helmet looks like it would be totally handy for a signaller with a headset
You should see the mandible attachment....makes a cheek weld an impossibility. Probably trialed by the same jacka$$ who trialed the tac vest...and the new "Mushroom" colored boots![]()
Mushroom colored boots? Id be curious to see that. I left the military so I dont get to hear about the new gear anymore.
Clear example of the CF always reinventing the wheel and coming up with a octagon.
Same person who came up with the design of the combat boots, installing accuwedge in the C8s, tac latch and we can go on.
Typical engineering bullsh*t... I tell you it's not only in the CF. Whenever engineers manage to put their hands on something they'll ruin it. I might be a little broad in my statement but hell I've seen it first hand with various MIL contracts we've had at work over the years. Not listening to the guys who actually use the stuff and much less about the people doing the testing.