Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Obama team reviewing 'virtually every agency,' aide says

  1. #1
    Bite my shiny metal ass! beNder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    party nonstop
    Posts
    15,101

    Default Obama team reviewing 'virtually every agency,' aide says

    (CNN) -- The head of President-elect Barack Obama's transition team said Sunday that the incoming administration is conducting an extensive review of President Bush's executive orders.

    Asked about reports that the transition team already has identified a number of areas where Obama could issue executive orders as soon as he takes office, John Podesta said he would not "preview decisions that [Obama] has yet to make."

    "I would say that as a candidate, Sen. Obama said that he wanted all the Bush executive orders reviewed and decide which ones should be kept and which ones should be repealed and which ones should be amended, and that process is going on. It's been undertaken," Podesta said Sunday on "Fox News."

    Podesta pointed out that there is a lot the president can do without waiting for Congress, and voters can expect to see Obama do so to try and restore "a sense that the country is working on behalf of the common good."
    "I think that we're looking at -- again, in virtually every agency to see where we can move forward, whether that's on energy transformation, on improving health care, on stem cell research," he said.

    Podesta, chief of staff under President Clinton, is president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank that he founded.
    Podesta said Sunday that preparations for Obama's transition have been in the works since early August.

    Asked what members of the team have learned from past administrations, Podesta said they knew they had to act quickly.

    "I think one of the most critical things ... that we focused on was it was important to name a White House chief of staff early and build a White House staff right from the beginning to go along with the Cabinet's [selection] process," he said.

    Watch more on the team's working weekend »

    Obama named Rep. Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff two days after the election.
    Podesta said he thinks Obama "intends to move very quickly" in naming other members of his senior leadership.

    "I think we're moving aggressively to try to build out that core economic team, the national security team, and you'll see announcements when they're ready," he said, pointing to Obama's Friday comments that he plans to move with "all deliberate haste."

    Podesta said to expect a Cabinet that "looks like the way President Obama ran his campaign."

    "He brought millions of people in. They weren't all Democrats. He reached out to independents and Republicans. And I think we want to see that reflected at every level of government," he said.

    Obama's first pick brought criticism from Republicans, some of whom said they thought Emanuel contradicted the Democrat's message of change.
    Emanuel insisted Sunday that he would help the president-elect work in a bipartisan fashion, brushing off criticism that he would be a "hyper-partisan" chief of staff.

    "President Obama is very clear, as you look at his career, both in the [Illinois] state Senate, U.S. Senate and the campaign, that we have to govern in a bipartisan fashion," he said on ABC's "This Week."

    "The challenges are big enough that there's going to be an ability for people of both parties, as well as independents, to contribute ideas to help meet the challenges on health care, energy, tax reform, education."
    After Obama's selection of Emanuel, the Republican National Committee put out a press release that said, "Obama's Broken Promise: After promising change, Obama selects hyper-partisan wedded to special interests." Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, called Emanuel an "ironic choice" for a president-elect who promised to "govern from the center."

    However, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, called Emanuel a "wise choice."

    Graham said he and Emanuel worked together during the presidential debate negotiations, and "when we hit a rough spot, he always looked for a path forward."

    Emanuel, who has a reputation as a tough political infighter, is credited with helping Democrats take control of the House of Representatives in 2006.

    He was elected to the House in 2002 and is the fourth highest-ranking member of the chamber's Democratic leadership. He worked on Clinton's first presidential campaign and was a White House adviser to Clinton.
    The Chicago, Illinois, politician said Sunday that it will take a joint effort from leaders of both parties to tackle the challenges facing the country.
    Emanuel also said he thought Sen. John McCain would be a "partner" in working to solve those problems.

    Obama has yet to make any Cabinet appointments, but several names have been floating around as top contenders.

    Senior Democrats say Sen. John Kerry is jockeying to be secretary of state -- and has a good case after endorsing Obama over Sen. Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries.

    New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel also may be in the hunt.
    Health care is another priority, with former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota a possibility. But Democratic sources say Howard Dean, a doctor who had a strong run as the Democratic National Committee chairman, is hungry for the job.

    Speculation about Obama's treasury secretary has centered on Lawrence Summers,though he's faced controversy over alleged sexist comments as president of Harvard University. Another name being mentioned is former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker.

    Plugged-in Democrats say there's also serious talk of Obama briefly keeping Robert Gates, President Bush's defense secretary, onboard.
    Podesta would only say Sunday that "there will be announcements forthcoming."
    Link to the article.

  2. #2
    No Good Bloody Seppo California Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Watching
    Age
    50
    Posts
    38,692

    Default

    Howard Dean should be in charge of health care. He's a f*cking doctor. Duh.

    He also implemented a comprehensive health care program for kids here in Vermont when he was Governor. Every kid can get free health care here if they need it.

  3. #3
    Bite my shiny metal ass! beNder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    party nonstop
    Posts
    15,101

    Default

    I am all for reversing the ban on stem cell research. So much good can be done and there are countries that are ahead of us in research.

  4. #4
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beNder View Post
    I am all for reversing the ban on stem cell research. So much good can be done and there are countries that are ahead of us in research.
    Yea it's crazy that such a valuable resource is just ignored almost, cuz some people think it's wrong to take cells from a dead fetus wtf? As usual religion keeping science and development BACK.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Lau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,009

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by California Joe View Post
    Howard Dean should be in charge of health care. He's a f*cking doctor. Duh.

    He also implemented a comprehensive health care program for kids here in Vermont when he was Governor. Every kid can get free health care here if they need it.
    Commie bastard!

  6. #6
    Bite my shiny metal ass! beNder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    party nonstop
    Posts
    15,101

    Default

    I'm religious but I also understand that if some good can be brought to those that have disease and/or suffering, then wouldn't God approve?

    Jesus healed the sick and diseased.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Traveling 200 of 365
    Posts
    1,433

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beNder View Post
    I'm religious but I also understand that if some good can be brought to those that have disease and/or suffering, then wouldn't God approve?

    Jesus healed the sick and diseased.
    Sadly Bush was just doing what is politically expedient. You don't get votes for allowing new stem cell lines to be introduced - you get idiot votes for prohibiting federal research money going to new cell lines.

    Pfft - if the Bush & religious co were serious about their "values" - they should start a outspoken campaign against IVF. Oh the humanity! Dozens of cells fertilized so parents may have a few children!!!

    But I guess that is too politically unpopular. So much for values.

  8. #8
    Muffin Bia's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Britches
    Age
    27
    Posts
    5,917

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by California Joe View Post
    Howard Dean should be in charge of health care. He's a f*cking doctor. Duh.

    He also implemented a comprehensive health care program for kids here in Vermont when he was Governor. Every kid can get free health care here if they need it.
    Here in Illinois all children can easily have full coverage too. Everyone says its wonderful with dental being the only slight hassle... apparently only a small percentage of dentists accept it for insurance.

    It's called All Kids :P

  9. #9
    Senior Member Zoomie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Last Frontier
    Posts
    5,217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by California Joe View Post
    Howard Dean should be in charge of health care. He's a f*cking doctor. Duh.

    He also implemented a comprehensive health care program for kids here in Vermont when he was Governor. Every kid can get free health care here if they need it.
    That's all fine and dandy CJ, but Vermont isn't that big of a state to begin with, considering it's the 2nd least populated state in the US. Something that's tailored for a state with a little over half a million people won't work well for a nation whose population is 480 times that of Vermont. It would be best if left up to the states to decide on their own without having the burden of another federal bureaucracy being forced upon them.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Chulo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    17,548

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Horse Thief View Post
    Yea it's crazy that such a valuable resource is just ignored almost, cuz some people think it's wrong to take cells from a dead fetus wtf? As usual religion keeping science and development BACK.
    If only it were simple as that. The whole stem cell issue is not just taking cells from a dead fetus, its alot more involved that than.

    and religion has been there for keeping science and development going froward (maybe not all the time), genetics as for one. Education, school systems, colleges, printed books are all from religious foundations
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Chalmers View Post
    Sadly Bush was just doing what is politically expedient. You don't get votes for allowing new stem cell lines to be introduced - you get idiot votes for prohibiting federal research money going to new cell lines.

    Pfft - if the Bush & religious co were serious about their "values" - they should start a outspoken campaign against IVF. Oh the humanity! Dozens of cells fertilized so parents may have a few children!!!

    But I guess that is too politically unpopular. So much for values.
    It depends on where you stand on life and conception. IVF may attempt to fertilize but if the egg doesn't "talk" then is it a life? Dozens of cells attempted for fertilization and only those which are viable and take become fertilized.

  11. #11
    Member Jurinko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Central Europe
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by California Joe View Post
    Every kid can get free health care here if they need it.
    Heath care is either for free, for everybody or good quality. At the same moment, only two of these premises can be valid.

    We have HC "for free" and "for everybody", resulting in very poor quality.
    Canadians AFAIK have "for free" and "good quality", but not for everybody - hence too long waiting times.

  12. #12
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chulo_allen View Post
    If only it were simple as that. The whole stem cell issue is not just taking cells from a dead fetus, its alot more involved that than.

    and religion has been there for keeping science and development going froward (maybe not all the time), genetics as for one. Education, school systems, colleges, printed books are all from religious foundations

    It depends on where you stand on life and conception. IVF may attempt to fertilize but if the egg doesn't "talk" then is it a life? Dozens of cells attempted for fertilization and only those which are viable and take become fertilized.
    Oh yea? And whats so much deeper about it?

  13. #13
    Senior Member Britboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Hanging out of your mam's backdoors ya slaaaagggs!
    Posts
    2,212

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jurinko View Post
    Heath care is either for free, for everybody or good quality. At the same moment, only two of these premises can be valid.

    We have HC "for free" and "for everybody", resulting in very poor quality.
    Canadians AFAIK have "for free" and "good quality", but not for everybody - hence too long waiting times.
    Hmm, then I should say that we have for everybody, decent quality and not-unreasonable waiting times. Thats been my experience, but I know other people have had others.

    What does annoy me is that we pay taxes for NHS dentistry, but it is v difficult to actually find an NHS dentist, esp one who is taking on patients!
    Means you either pay twice for treatments (v annoying when your NHS dentist you've used since being a kid, who no doubt benefitted from the public purse when undergoing training, effectively says 'stump up the cash or seeya') or a lot of people don't get seen...

    Why is it always dentistry thats the drama?

  14. #14
    Senior Member WarriorMonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD AND SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE!!!!!!
    Posts
    1,913

    Default

    There is no God, only man.

  15. #15
    No Good Bloody Seppo California Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Watching
    Age
    50
    Posts
    38,692

    Default

    Zoomie, I agree it's apples and oranges, just pointing out that he actually made it work here. Maybe it works as a test case, maybe not.

    I don't really think it should be news that a new administration is reviewing every agency. I would assume that every new administration does it. At least I hope so.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •