Reply With Quoteand one more question...
hope that's not repost...
are those nozzles for serial PAK FA or only experimental?
every PAK FA sketches i've seen - with round "conventional" nozzes
Digital camo? Where?Originally Posted by artjomh
and one more question...
hope that's not repost...
are those nozzles for serial PAK FA or only experimental?
every PAK FA sketches i've seen - with round "conventional" nozzes
5th gen fighters should still be pretty damn good at dogfighting. They have a significant advantage in terms of thrust to weight over 4th gen fighters (resulting in better climb rates etc), and advantage the of thrust vectoring (which enables various stall inducing maneuvers) , even if their aerodynamics may not be as finely tuned towards maneuverability (although this can be disputed).
PAK-FA will almost certainly have round nozzles. Russia has not shown any interest in flat nozzles since the pictured research project sometime in the 80s or early 90s. I think the intention is also to have full 3D thrust vectoring, something thats I think not possible with flat nozzles.
not pak-fa its old )))
If I am not mistaken, that's old protytype 2D thrust-vectoring nozzles for Su-27. Design abandoned after testing.
OK, not really digital. Macro-digital (an oxymoron, I know). Whatever. 8)Digital camo? Where?
Black? BLACK???????!!!!!!!!!!??????? you have got to be having an absolute laugh mate - Black? seriously?
Black is the worst ever colour you could paint a low to mid level airframe - its the one colour that catches the eye in the sky the most bar sun glinting off a metallic airframe. It is absolute zero use for day time missions, and only any use for really, really high airframes - even then, a deep grey is better.
There is a reason why RAF training airframes and Police Helicopters in the UK are black - its simply the easiest colour to see because it matches absolutely nothing at all.
[QUOTE = 2495; 4682467] Черный? BLACK ???????!!!!!!!!!!??????? ты должен быть с абсолютной Mate смеяться - черный? серьезно?
Черный худшее все цвета можно нарисовать низкого и среднего уровня планер - его одного цвета, что бросается в глаза в небо самый Бар ВС сверкают от металлических планеров. Это абсолютный нуль использовать для миссий светлое время суток, и только не использовал очень, очень высокая планеры, - даже тогда, глубокий серый, тем лучше.
Существует причина, почему RAF подготовка планера и полицейских вертолетов в Великобритании черный - его просто простым цветом, чтобы увидеть, поскольку он соответствует абсолютно ничего. [/ QUOTE]
not black
USAF T-38 Talons have also been black with red serials and markings.
Black is Obvious.
Su-47 - Black for test flight visibility
SR-71 & U-2 Black since they fly at the edge of space
matt black...with low thermal reflection
and looks scary
look su-34
Nose - I think will be same)))
And here colouring)) saw only time a picture on stages of skilled colouring of one of su-34 unusual colours both the big squares and polygons, but colours unusual)) and matte as though light absorbs
but what about signature?
round in comparison with flat?
F-22 has flat, F-35 has round because of STOVL...
You paint your supersonic low to medium airframe matt black and enjoy getting hit by every IR weapon in your threat arena. Hell, every optic in the sky will be able to see you at a substantial distance further than low vis scheme.matt black...with low thermal reflection
and looks scary
Enjoy your matt black heat and light show.
just take a look on TR-1 and Blackbird picks...
SR-71 is supersonic like no other...it's one of the world's first aircraft with the stealth elements....
what about his IR visibility?
Posting Permissions
