Thread: Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA

  1. #1651
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Moscow/Khabarovsk
    Posts
    4,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andarius-Militarius View Post
    But according to MKZT, its like the 10th or 20th largest budget. Taking into account inflation, embezzlement by Sergei Ivanov and friends, and single digit deliveries.

    Sorry, just posting the bad news now, because if he posts the same thing, its going to personally annoy me. Of course he's no insider just a random speculator. These days anybody who reads an article or a blog is automatically dubbed an expert.
    MKZT has an unhealthy obsession with so called "corruption". Unless the former-KGB/national security services no longer exist in Russia. (which I somehow doubt since they staged a government coup to put Putin in power). In the defense sphere I doubt there is a whole lot corruption. The real problem is the lack of engineers which I mentioned earlier. Half of Soviet engineers are working for defense contracts making weapons for the US and Europe, much like this was done to Germany after WWII.

  2. #1652
    Senior Member eATS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,199

    Default

    one of my fav Indian forums... their PAK-FA thread.

    http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/vie...st=0&sk=t&sd=a

  3. #1653
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russianlynxy View Post
    MKZT has an unhealthy obsession with so called "corruption". Unless the former-KGB/national security services no longer exist in Russia. (which I somehow doubt since they staged a government coup to put Putin in power).
    government coup????

    In the defense sphere I doubt there is a whole lot corruption. The real problem is the lack of engineers which I mentioned earlier. Half of Soviet engineers are working for defense contracts making weapons for the US and Europe, much like this was done to Germany after WWII.
    The braindrain is either true, however how to explain that russian shipyards build 4000t ships for India within 3 years, but 2000t ships for the own country take 6-7 years. In both cases the engineers are the same, apparently the difference are the hands through which the cash flows to the shipyard.

    Other example from civilian industry: How to explain that Hristenko declares abandoning large range airliner production, kills the promising NK-93 engine directly before MAKS 2009 despite Putin's direct order, and blocks indigenous designs while promoting Suchoj RRJ (which contains only 40% of added value produced in Russia, what a coincidence). Is it some new approach to attract young engineers to russian industry?

    The "so called "corruption"" is something only a blind or Russia!!!Strong crewmember would not see.

  4. #1654
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Moscow/Khabarovsk
    Posts
    4,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MZKT View Post
    Other example from civilian industry: How to explain that Hristenko declares abandoning large range airliner production, kills the promising NK-93 engine directly before MAKS 2009 despite Putin's direct order, and blocks indigenous designs while promoting Suchoj RRJ (which contains only 40% of added value produced in Russia, what a coincidence). Is it some new approach to attract young engineers to russian industry?
    There's an enemy currently sitting as the Minister of MOD. I have no idea how a former Customs agent made it into that position rather than Generals with first hand experience behind them. Regarding India, there is a struggle to maintain a large military export sector. India is important because they are a large-quantity customer currently between US and Russian weapon choices. Which is why the defense sector has to compromise in order to hold on to a customer.

  5. #1655
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MZKT View Post
    Other example from civilian industry: How to explain that Hristenko declares abandoning large range airliner production, kills the promising NK-93 engine directly before MAKS 2009 despite Putin's direct order
    Yeah, i know, under reign of Great Leader Lukashenko such things would be impossible
    Quote Originally Posted by MZKT View Post
    and blocks indigenous designs while promoting Suchoj RRJ (which contains only 40% of added value produced in Russia, what a coincidence).
    Maybe because its better to produce 40% of the best in the world aircraft than 100% of indigenous 2nd rate aircraft no one will buy?

  6. #1656
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Russianlynxy View Post
    There's an enemy currently sitting as the Minister of MOD. I have no idea how a former Customs agent made it into that position rather than Generals with first hand experience behind them. Regarding India, there is a struggle to maintain a large military export sector. India is important because they are a large-quantity customer currently between US and Russian weapon choices. Which is why the defense sector has to compromise in order to hold on to a customer.
    Which compromise? The ships are built on different shipyards. Indian ships at Yantar and Steregushchys at Severnaya Werf. There is no tradeoff. So how to explain those abnormal production periods?

    BTW If Serdjukov is an enemy, who are Hristenko, Fursenko and Kudrin then? And is Putin (who appointed them) also one? (what a blasphemy)

    Maybe because its better to produce 40% of the best in the world aircraft than 100% of indigenous 2nd rate aircraft no one will buy?
    Any facts proving this "worlds best"? Embraer and Bombardier offer aircraft of this class already for years, what's superior about RRJ?

    Yeah, i know, under reign of Great Leader Lukashenko such things would be impossible
    Expectable reaction. At least we know that under Putin it's possible.

  7. #1657
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Can I get some source that only 40% of SUperjet is Russian?

    Superjet is close to breaking even already, the program is guaranteed to be a success as it is, a minor success, or a great one, will remain to be seen. I know it is hard to accept anything is going well in Russia MZKT, but ragging on Superjet is nonsense.

  8. #1658
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MZKT View Post
    Any facts proving this "worlds best"? Embraer and Bombardier offer aircraft of this class already for years, what's superior about RRJ?
    Its cheaper with lower fuel consumption

  9. #1659
    Senior Member Derbedeu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Sapp View Post
    Superjet is close to breaking even already, the program is guaranteed to be a success as it is, a minor success, or a great one, will remain to be seen.
    Actually it's been indefinitely delayed as the engines aren't ready yet.

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...ed/396945.html

  10. #1660
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    hiding in the bushes near Chengdu
    Posts
    6,103

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Derbedeu View Post
    Actually it's been indefinitely delayed as the engines aren't ready yet.

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...ed/396945.html
    They'll fix the problems and then worst comes to worst shove the SuperJet down the throats of some regional airlines, if the international partners get tired of waiting and international sales don't materialize.

  11. #1661
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,629

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Sapp View Post
    Can I get some source that only 40% of SUperjet is Russian?
    http://www.ifs.ru/upload/030909-sukhoi-en.pdf

    Superjet is close to breaking even already, the program is guaranteed to be a success as it is, a minor success, or a great one, will remain to be seen. I know it is hard to accept anything is going well in Russia MZKT, but ragging on Superjet is nonsense.
    The success of Superjet is not estimatable, so far only CIS and CIS-owned companies issued orders for Superjet, Tu-334 is not less viable option for those companies, but with a significantly higher domestic amount.

    Those absolutes about "guaranteed success" are rather odd, is there any reason for "guaranteed failure" of Tu-334?

    Its cheaper with lower fuel consumption
    Claimed by Suchoj (and every jet designer in the world when introducing a new model) Bombardier and Embraer claim exactly the same for their models with the new GE engine.

    The question is not if RRJ would be successfull, the question is why russian ministry of industry decisively promoted a design which was only at the initial state of development and was more foreign then domestic, while having completely developed Tu-334 available, but denying funds for certification. Unlike RRJ, Tu-334 had an option for domestic engines and would be ready for serial production already 2005.

  12. #1662
    Member flyingfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montana bad lands
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eATS View Post
    one of my fav Indian forums... their PAK-FA thread.

    http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/vie...st=0&sk=t&sd=a
    Good stuff thanks.

    I have found some interesting information on this one as well.


    http://www.***********.net/showthrea...ghlight=Pak-Fa
    Last edited by flyingfish; 01-09-2010 at 11:08 PM. Reason: Bad link

  13. #1663
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Derbedeu View Post
    Actually it's been indefinitely delayed as the engines aren't ready yet.

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/busine...ed/396945.html
    Great, this delay won't change much in the bigger picture.

  14. #1664
    Member flyingfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montana bad lands
    Posts
    78

    Default

    hmm strange can't link it shows up.
    http://www.***********.net/showthrea...ghlight=Pak-Fa
    Try typing it in after the www.***********.net
    ***********

  15. #1665
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MZKT View Post
    http://www.ifs.ru/upload/030909-sukhoi-en.pdf

    The success of Superjet is not estimatable, so far only CIS and CIS-owned companies issued orders for Superjet, Tu-334 is not less viable option for those companies, but with a significantly higher domestic amount.

    Those absolutes about "guaranteed success" are rather odd, is there any reason for "guaranteed failure" of Tu-334?

    Claimed by Suchoj (and every jet designer in the world when introducing a new model) Bombardier and Embraer claim exactly the same for their models with the new GE engine.

    The question is not if RRJ would be successfull, the question is why russian ministry of industry decisively promoted a design which was only at the initial state of development and was more foreign then domestic, while having completely developed Tu-334 available, but denying funds for certification. Unlike RRJ, Tu-334 had an option for domestic engines and would be ready for serial production already 2005.
    Tu-334 would fail miserably on international market, funny you would bring it up, talk about non competative aircrfat. Whats next, Tu-204 should have been emphasized more?

    Second, the Superjet has been ordered by non CIS companies, what nonsense. Italy, Spain, Hungary, Indonesia.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •