Who knows. I am more thinking that this is aerodynamic modification. It could be camera that is lying, but i have compared with several MAKS pictures, and the outcome is the same, T-50-1/-2 supports looks different than on the T-50-3.
Yeah, we are a sad sad bunch of people.![]()
Well, Sukhoi got so much pressure from so many posters on so many forums urging them to fit the T-50 with a single piece canopy that they decided to retaliate by reverting to the 3 pieces set !!!
Do not upset Sukhoi, they can drive you mad !!![]()
From sivisoko on http://www.mycity-military.com/Avija...lovac_175.html
^^ that's the 50-2 if i am not mistake ?
Funny...I made a similar Photoshop ages ago (this spring, right when the T-50-2 had flown for the first time). Pretty much identical to that image, except that I didn't just desaturate the entire thing, I also highlighted the HUD and the serration on the radome:
Also I didn't desaturate the landing light back then...![]()
Last edited by moosefoot; 12-01-2011 at 02:02 AM.
3d vectoring ??? look at the places on the wing of the pak fa can turn and then talk ...
There are photos of the engines shifted off enter (one shifter, other straight), so the engine can do 3D vectoring.
Any explanation for these pictures?
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
^^ 51 and 52 had a bastard child :P
Is PAK-FA going to have flat nozzles or not ? if not why ? no 3D thrust vectoring with flat nozzles ? loss of thrust?