Thread: Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA

  1. #2611
    Senior Member Brute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,044

    Default


  2. #2612

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfacentori View Post
    All I can say now is for the love of god don't sell any to China

    Alfa
    pretty sure they already sketching this thing 2 years from now we will be seeing this flying around china

  3. #2613
    Senior Member Herman the II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jµµso View Post
    It makes Gripen and Eurofighter look a bit old fashioned.
    They flew 20 years ago, so....

  4. #2614
    Senior Member Herman the II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,226

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brute View Post
    Thx, so there are two in the belly. Interesting!

  5. #2615
    Senior Member Meatwad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Canada New Jersey
    Posts
    2,328

    Default

    That looks mean from the top down (best view IMO). She has some killer angles from the intakes and wings. congrats to the designers, builders, pilot and crew. Crazy.

  6. #2616
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -Julik- 4.GdKp View Post
    Changing my post?Go and cry infront of your ugly gripen pic boy.
    Leave your nationalism out of this. Me and others call it as we see it and not to be spiteful.

    To me the initial impression is that it looks similar to previous MiGs and SUs. Like someone trying to keep up on a budget. If you see it in a different way that's fine with me.


  7. #2617
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default

    This plane is a disappointment, although I didn't expected much from Russia given their budget problems.

  8. #2618

    Default

    this thread is gonna see a lot of action the next 24 hours. So whats the next step, they gonna push its limits see what it can do in the air? or some redesigns of certain parts etc.

  9. #2619
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jµµso View Post
    It makes Gripen and Eurofighter look a bit old fashioned.
    No offence but Eurofighter looks more futuristic than this, just look at that 3rd gen ala F-14 engine placement on pak fa.
    Last edited by Daily dose; 01-29-2010 at 04:25 AM.

  10. #2620
    Senior Member Steak-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saupreiß, Obacht!
    Posts
    9,239

    Default

    Congrats Sukhoi! It's always nice to see when new aircrafts are in their element for the very first time.

    I'm a bit disappointed with its look though, and would rather go for the blond TV chick in one of the first youtube vids.

  11. #2621

    Default

    Relax guys it's the first flying prototype. It not finish version.

  12. #2622
    Senior Member Stonewall71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the Frak side of the Universe
    Age
    42
    Posts
    2,391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daily dose View Post
    This plane is a disappointment, although I didn't expected much from Russia given their budget problems.

    what did you expect? a TIE-Fighter?

  13. #2623

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pilot_35 View Post
    Relax guys it's the first flying prototype. It not finish version.
    of course its the Russian version it aint gonna get much better unless they can get a lil closer to Lockheed and Northrup hangers

  14. #2624
    terrorist sympathiser
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10,230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daily dose View Post
    This plane is a disappointment, although I didn't expected much from Russia given their budget problems.
    oh welcome! an F-22 pilot!

  15. #2625
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    In the Hole
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jµµso View Post
    It makes Gripen and Eurofighter look a bit old fashioned.

    I lol @ your blindness troll.


    Anyhoo congrats on getting the plane up. Always an important step. First impressions are good it looks like what it should in most parts. Some positive points it looks like a very strong solid airframe, larger than I expected with a flat overall looking shape which is good. Good size payload bay. Some more negitive points tho those intakes are huge good luck in not getting any fod down there ! Those fin sections are too disproportionate to the rest of the airframe. Much too small in my eyes. The rear of the aircraft is in need of a bit of change I think the rcs and heat sig of the rear is prob not on par of the f22 its too su 27 looking at the rear not thats thats bad I just dont think it would be as stealthy at the rear. Overall its a nice airframe.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •