Reply With QuoteSu-34 doesn't have radar in the stinger, it is another myth.Originally Posted by AustinJ
If thats the case why did they decide to put a Radar on the tail sting of Su-34 what purpose does it serve
Su-34 doesn't have radar in the stinger, it is another myth.
http://uk-odk.complexdoc.ru/95462.html
16 engines have been completed, with 6 of them released for prototypes (installed on T-50-1,2,3)
That mean they have engines for the 4th prototype and for 4 pre-serial planes. So RuAF could actually get pre-serial planes in 2013, 2014?
No, not sure if you can read russian, but atleast run it through google translate.
6 are for stand tests, REST is for prototypes. That makes it: 10 engines on the prototypes. T-50KNS, -1, -2, -3 and maybe 4 has them installed already.
Is there any official confirmation on angular EO sensor design ?
What for? To make it look cooler?
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/sho...&postcount=524
Possible radar blocker ?
That's Japanese from what I gather, for the ATD-X Shinshin:
Possible radar blocker ?
http://eletec.web.fc2.com/333.html
The photo looks like a scan from a magazine, probably some Japanese one. Maybe somebody fluent in Japanese can dig it out or prove me wrong.
When people shamelessly copy pictures from Paralay forum without checking facts, small puppy dies.
True story.
Many new pictures uploaded:
http://www.knaapo.ru/rus/gallery/eve...-50/t-50-3.wbp
Back to T-50-1 style canopy, and the black spots on the sides of the tail are UV-50 (flares).
How was the canopy on the T-50-2 different? I couldn't spot anything?
It didn't have a longitudinal rib in the after half, as the ones on 50-1 and 50-3 do.
Notice the vertical tail supports.
They seem to have gone bigger with a change in orientation. Can't understand the logic behind it. Stronger actuators ?
Notice the vertical tail supports.
Posting Permissions
