Thread: Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA

  1. #6466
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,600

    Default

    From the interview what i can make out is they are planning to use RVV-MD and RVV-SD as A2A missile for PAK-FA but from what i have read before PAK-FA will have a new class of A2A missile , Id 300 as WVR and BVR missile will be Ramjet R-77 and R-77M.

  2. #6467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twinblade View Post

    Even this Berkut concept seems to be getting it right
    could any one name this fighter jet??

  3. #6468
    Senior Member EdisonTrent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bhramos View Post
    could any one name this fighter jet??
    Really? I am quoting this before you realize how stupid you are.

  4. #6469

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EdisonTrent View Post
    Really? I am quoting this before you realize how stupid you are.
    why mate?
    is this just a Graphic pic!!!!!!!

  5. #6470
    Senior Member Universals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    peace to this young warrior without the sound of guns
    Posts
    8,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bhramos View Post
    why mate?
    is this just a Graphic pic!!!!!!!
    indeed, it's graphic. NSFW. the butt on that plane is hideous.

  6. #6471
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,042

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bhramos View Post
    why mate?
    is this just a Graphic pic!!!!!!!
    The plane in the picture does not exist, it is a photoshop/concept art. The concept art is based on the Berkut Su-47 technology demonstrator, but has several differences (engine nacelles being the most obvious).

  7. #6472
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    OR,India
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bhramos View Post
    why mate?
    is this just a Graphic pic!!!!!!!
    that plane is practically not possible

  8. #6473
    Senior Member twinblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    In front of the telly, watching cricket.
    Posts
    4,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by abhishek-nayak View Post
    that plane is practically not possible
    Umm... why ?

  9. #6474
    Senior Member tea drinker's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Kuffar Khalifate
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twinblade View Post
    Umm... why ?
    it's asymetric?

  10. #6475
    Senior Member twinblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    In front of the telly, watching cricket.
    Posts
    4,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tea drinker View Post
    it's asymetric?
    In what respect ?

  11. #6476
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,987

    Default

    Do we have an idea yet of how two seat PAKFA will look like? Has there been official concepts out yet ?

    edit: will it be side side like su34 or behind like normal jet ?

  12. #6477
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anonymousville
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xav View Post
    Do we have an idea yet of how two seat PAKFA will look like? Has there been official concepts out yet ?

    edit: will it be side side like su34 or behind like normal jet ?
    I think behind like a normal jet, side by side doesn't seem like the "stealthier" option

  13. #6478
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    32
    Posts
    12,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atzo View Post
    I think behind like a normal jet, side by side doesn't seem like the "stealthier" option
    Well you have B2, but yeah, different concept

  14. #6479
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    OR,India
    Age
    25
    Posts
    1,747

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twinblade View Post
    Umm... why ?
    just look at the configuration...if the plane has jet engine inside of it then those vanes at nozzle outlet would prevent from giving a sufficient thrust besides suffering from severe wear and tear.I don't think so this kind of plane can have jet engine inside of it...it's just too thin

  15. #6480
    Senior Member twinblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    In front of the telly, watching cricket.
    Posts
    4,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by abhishek-nayak View Post
    just look at the configuration...if the plane has jet engine inside of it then those vanes at nozzle outlet would prevent from giving a sufficient thrust besides suffering from severe wear and tear.
    I doubt that those are "vanes". The inner two seem to be the actual nozzles, but its just an artists representation, not an actual fighter
    I don't think so this kind of plane can have jet engine inside of it...it's just too thin
    Look up the pictures of Berkut. It is more or less Berkut with stealthy nozzles and oddly shaped stabilizers.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •