Thread: Chinese Military Photos(new thread)

  1. #4351
    Senior Member eATS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,200

    Default












  2. #4352
    Member Randy M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    SP, Colorado
    Posts
    706

    Default

    ^^^^^


    Wooow, impressive.

  3. #4353
    Senior Member eATS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,200

    Default

    plasma stealth?




  4. #4354
    Senior Member eATS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,200

    Default










  5. #4355

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eATS View Post








    As we can see here on the 2002 they have changed the wheel bay door operation mode. On the 2001 the wheel-carriage doors remain open when the wheel is out. On the 2002 the doors (probably partially) close when the wheel is in fixed position.

  6. #4356
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,557

    Default


  7. #4357
    Senior Member metberkut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    You can't be serious eATS.

  8. #4358
    Senior Member eATS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by metberkut View Post
    You can't be serious eATS.
    No its CHICOM, im passing their gas and their comparisons to the 360 sensors, their saying like the modern Russian fighters J-20 will also have plasma stealth and boasting how much beter their sensor suite is over T-50 because they are embedded better.

    not my opinions, i just know where they post and collect their datas....

  9. #4359
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tiny island beside Europe
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eATS View Post
    No its CHICOM, im passing their gas and their comparisons to the 360 sensors, their saying like the modern Russian fighters J-20 will also have plasma stealth and boasting how much beter their sensor suite is over T-50 because they are embedded better.

    not my opinions, i just know where they post and collect their datas....
    You must have been dealing with the worst among them. I visit Chinese DF daily and I never came across with those ridiculous speculation you mention. Great pic by the way, job well done!

  10. #4360
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Tiny island beside Europe
    Posts
    138

    Default

    By the way, those weird light grey dots on B2's nose, what are they?

  11. #4361
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,215

    Default

    The spots on the B-2 are flush, air data sensors. The little windows on the F-22 are missile warning sensors. Similar windows on the F-35 are for the EO DAS. God only knows what they are on the J-20. BTW take a look at the J-20's canopy compared to the F-22's and tell me they didn't rip that fvcker off.

  12. #4362
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    République de Louisiane
    Posts
    110

    Default

    http://theaviationist.com/2012/05/12/2002-nose/

    Found this. Any word of an AESA-type radar being true on the 2002?

  13. #4363
    Senior Member metberkut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    I higly, higly doubt it AK. First off, it is second prototype, it would not make sense just out of that. Then it is pretty clear the nose is not radar transparent.

    Ah ok eATS, was worried for a sec there.
    Quote Originally Posted by C.Puffs View Post
    The spots on the B-2 are flush, air data sensors. The little windows on the F-22 are missile warning sensors. Similar windows on the F-35 are for the EO DAS. God only knows what they are on the J-20. BTW take a look at the J-20's canopy compared to the F-22's and tell me they didn't rip that fvcker off.
    It is exact copy. Literally. Which makes no sense really, because that canopy was designed for F-22 and a certain span of waves.

    PS:
    blue - F-22A, red - J-20

    1). canopy profile from CATIA F-22A drawings compared to Gao Shan color 3-view (unrotated and rotated to match Gao's canopy frame angle)
    I somewhat presume that Gao Shan surely had access to much more hi-res photos than we ever saw...
    2). the same compared to famous VIP vizit photo (canopy rotated in AutoCAD, ajusted to canopy frame size, unrotated)

    PPG should watch their security better...

  14. #4364
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    République de Louisiane
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by metberkut View Post
    I higly, higly doubt it AK. First off, it is second prototype, it would not make sense just out of that. Then it is pretty clear the nose is not radar transparent.
    Ah! Alright. Thanks, Met!

  15. #4365
    Senior Member D-Mitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    A Greek in the Netherlands who struggles with the bad weather every day..
    Posts
    6,540

    Default

    Wow! Up to now, the Chinese naval escort taskforce has completed the escorting missions for a total of 4,640 Chinese and foreign ships with a 100% success rate. http://navaltoday.com/2012/05/14/chi...r-4-640-ships/

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •