+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: The "Bullpup carbine", a rifle design of my own, inspired by Boberg pistol

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    5

    The "Bullpup carbine", a rifle design of my own, inspired by Boberg pistol

    *Im not sure if this belongs in Gear or pics n vids*

    After studying the boberg pistol, I kinda 'upscaled' the mechanism a lil bit and ended up with this.

    a lazy attempt at modelling the outer shell using Milkshape lolo


    and the simple animation of the internals


    Caliber: 5.56x45mm
    Magazine capacity: 30 rnds
    Rate of fire: With such a system, i'd say pretty low, maybe 500rnd/min?
    Operation: Gas operated, short stroke piston, beretta 92f style locked breech.

    Ideally with such mechanism, a full sized barrel can fit inside a carbine sized weapon while still having the conventional rifle layout on the outside, as opposed to the sometimes akward bullpup configuration.

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    California Cowpuncher Soldat_Américain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The land of the big PX.
    Age
    21
    Posts
    6,570

    interesting to say the least

  3. #3

    If it's a bullpup, why is the mag in front of the trigger?


    Ah, watched the animation... I get it... still why not just put the mag to the rear?

  4. #4
    Member Mormaeglin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Prussia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    843

    Exacly is this final idea?

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    5

    its much faster to reload a rifle of a conventional layout than a of a bullpup layout, and it guess its for countries sticking to the conventional rifle rather than bullpups

  6. #6

    Interesting but doesnt make this construction/system the rifle much heavier compared to other bullpup rifles?

  7. #7
    Member Hollereer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Between the dykes.
    Posts
    228

    I think it might be too complicated and prone to getting stuck.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Croatia
    Age
    30
    Posts
    16

    IMHO, this is overcomplicating an already complicated (bullpup) design.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    17

    Neat idea, but every moving part is just another weak point that can break.

    Apply the principles of K.I.S.S.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    120

    Quote Originally Posted by Coma View Post
    Neat idea, but every moving part is just another weak point that can break.

    Apply the principles of K.I.S.S.
    Are there actually that many moving parts, I count 4. Then theres gonna be some locking pins and lugs, cartridge extractors and stuff but all rifles have those.

    Also the animations shows it to be automatic without any other parts (except spring and gas piston) to operate. So I'd say it's less complicated than a FN FNC for example.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDarkOne
    IMHO, this is overcomplicating an already complicated (bullpup) design.
    Apply the principles of K.I.S.S.
    What is complicated aboute a bullpup IYHO, the removal of the stock?

  11. #11
    Stinky McSmells a lot Evolv5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fils de Chips
    Posts
    5,051

    Not really into all this technicality, but never-the-less, well made animation. Keep it up.

  12. #12
    Member badly_packed_kebab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Up North, With your Pint
    Posts
    106

    Great video and design idea, keep up the good work!

    To me there's nothing complex about bullpup design. Sure it may be hard to get used to, but once you spend time on range (even I, with the limited time I got on range with the L98, got used to the magazine being where it is). Also, an experienced user can change mags just as fast as any rifle in a regular configuration.

  13. #13

    I like it!

    I would go with conventional ejection. No need to make it more complex with the forward ejection.

  14. #14
    Senior Member click's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    The land of a butt load of lakes (Minnesota)
    Age
    19
    Posts
    2,114

    Whats complicated about a bullpup layout?

  15. #15
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sitting on my couch watching the Canucks.
    Posts
    61

    Quote Originally Posted by click View Post
    Whats complicated about a bullpup layout?
    My words exactly.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts