Removed turret is a different variant and shall be counted as seperate one as it is the rule. It is the very same with any other vehicle like for example Humvees or Cobras, unless they simply removed the "turret" from allready constructed vehicles. Also, keep in mind that we have absolutly no insight into what TAM is actualy constructing, including a new APC ( saw raw material ).
Dude you have wishes

. Who will give you Javelin .... ? Hm, apart of the fact that TAM also clones allmost every RPG variant that exist, including Czech and Polish mockoffs, what makes you claim that those "ONE-SHOT" tubes are somewhat superior to the RPG-7, one of the most dangerous AT weapons around ? don't know where you got your infos bro, but inform yourself better. Effeciviness does also depend on the warhead and as you shall know, you can carry 3-4 different warheads at the same time, for a single tube. AT-4 my ass. What if you miss with your AT-4 and that tank simply drives through your cover to whoop your arse ? Wouldn't you have been happier with an RPG-7 ? Don't mix early RPG-7 variants from decades ago, with the ones beeing constructed today. All eastern European nations use it for the entire armed forces. Never, never underestimate the RPG-7 because some people just don't like Russians and try to oust their weapons with poor knowledge. That weapon in my honest eyes, is the best AT weapon for the mass, that has ever been developed. Must also thank the Germans on this part =/
But anyhow, the criteria of mass production is fullfilled. The quality is a different question.
The Lazika has most likely it's strongest armour to the front and slightly underneath ( Stanag 4 ), while the rear is allmost unprotected ( Stanag 1 ) and the flanks are medium protected ( Stanag 2+ ) and not like it is beeing claimed to have allround Level 4 protection. That is simply bull****, considering how small it is and I doubt that TAM has developed Alien like armour technology. I didn't believe those infos provided by MOD, allready when I saw that tiny thing the first time. S
People may not like me for this, but the BMP-2 base variant is simply a driving coffin compared to modern APC's. The BMP-2 base variant has much inferior armour than the Lazika base variant which is equipped with long range finders, thermal imaging, night vision and advanced communication systems. If the Lazika base variant had a 2a42 30mm and some Konkurs missiles installed, it would be definitly one of the deadliest IFV's. Yet apart of that all, Lazika lacks on other defensive barriers, like active defense. If you ask me, the "yet not as completly developed Lazika" got a sad faith as beeing exposed way too early to the public. Trust me, they will make a lot more out of it. This was just a show-off for Saakasvhili's media clown party.
I know what you want. Better to copy and paste the BMP-2, but with the same electronics like Lazika has and upgraded with advanced composite armour and weapon platform. That would be a good start. But can you imagine the giant amount of money you would need to do that .... ? 100 BMP-2s updated like that ? That's no joke to deal with dude. Poland has allready massive financial problems to upgrade half of their IFV's. But even then, the Lazika would still do a better job, when beeing finished with developement, because it simply allready provides the modern base and there is not much to add anymore, even armor.
Yes, the issue with ammunition is absolutly correct and I agree completly. What we do not need, is a ****load of AKs again. we need to seriously concentrate on developing something that is based on the durability of the soviet AK-47, but also on modern standarts relating to combat effectiviness ( accuracy at long range distance ). AK-47 was developed for the mass, we don't have mass, we have a very small armed forces so we need a decent assault rifle.
If you thought about the AK-12, ...... then I don't know what you're thinking .... ^^