btw. we have a PM and a royal family. Never had a president.
Just to understand something illogical, that's all. You didn't understand my point of view.
I didn't say the article was a kind of antisemitism. But today a diffamation is allowed, tommorow why not antisemitism ?
I just find that allowing diffamation is dangerous.
By the way, I think next week or two weeks, this story will be forgotten.
I don't know about you guys but I'm having a cross tattooed over my vital organs.
On my previous post, it was too simple.
It is like knowing that in history people have used insane blood libels about the Dutch, and then incite hatred using historic blood libels against the very army of the only country this people (I chose Dutch at random) have and then say "hey it's not about the Dutch"
And then have some leftie anti-Netherlands person say "hey Dutch army isn't the Dutch (cuz there's like Frisians)"
If I were an Israeli I'd like to kick some Eurotrash in the butt.
Lieberman must have missed that the reason Norway didnt walk out was that we actually answered the fvck ahmadinejad .
There was nothing of a kind in discussed article.
No. The law i.e. the courts and police are still working so far in Sweden. To break them the swedish have to get out from EU first.Because if a state accepts diffamation like this article, unlike there are evidences, tommorow we'll see racism and antisemitism in newspapers.
Dude, forensic pathologists never have a deal with living bodies and organs suitable for transplantation.
Go back to Google and try to find something else.
Last edited by squidO; 08-23-2009 at 09:41 PM.
buhu cry babies