The Queen Elizabeth is capable of launching French nuclear missiles! Wow.
France would have every right to have a different foreign policy to the U.K remember the second gulf war . a commitment to N.A.T.O being different to actions against a state the partners have differing views apon
The general level of sarcasm from some quarters is very sad indeed.
On the French question , The US is by far our closest friend and allie and that relationship as benefits with out equal , and I can not see a situation were we would be firing missiles with out the US doing the same ,
France is more drawn towards Germany than us , yes we have signed a few defence cooperation deals with France and I see France as one of the few doers in Europe militarily but I wouldn't want to get that involved with them tbh , as friends and allies sure , nuclear deterrent noooooooooooo thank you lol.
PS Maybe this discussion should be in the Uk armed forces thread , apologies for going off topic guys
Last edited by Noisy Ghost; 8 Hours Ago at 03:49 PM.
Its not so much sarcasm as cynism as to the ability of nation states to agree on measures and quickly respond to an identified crisis , I seem to recall that Russia was against further nuclear weapon cutbacks in its arsenal .
The shipyard proposal seems to indicate one per year, wasnt there also a plan for the devlopment of these ships for export, could one yard handle an unknown number of exports ?
If I was the UK or France I would want my own nuclear capability.
Not necessary when much of the indispensable satcom and satellite intelligence comes from US satellites. In the absurd scenario that requires them to hamper british operations they do not like, they could just stop supplying comms and satellite imagery and intelligence, and the UK would be in trouble in trying to communicate with the SSBNs and very likely in even worse trouble if needing to fire Tomahawks due to their guidance and employment method... Have you ever noticed how spectacularly light the UK is in national satellite resources compared to France or even Italy...? Aside from Skynet comms, there's no military satellites. No radar-sat, no imagery-sat. And a very fair share of submarine communications lean on US satellites, most notably via the new AEHF constellation.I have always worried that our closest ally (USA) may well have some code secreted in 'our' SLBM's such that they could prevent us launching (or guide our missiles off-target) should we want to use them in a way that doesn't suit the USA.
I would not expect the R.N to operate these carriers in hostile situations for the most part unless as a partner of a coalition ,
"I would not expect" are probably the most ill advised words to use when discussing possible future military operations. Who would have thought on September 10th 2001 that even years later we would be fighting the Taliban and Al Qaeda, removed Saddam and Gaddafi, assisted the French in Mali and heaven knows what else we don't know about.
Now we know PoW and QE will both be commissioned, is it conceivable that they would or could sail together in the same task force? Do we have enough sailors to man both ships at the same time? That would make an awesome sight!
Perhaps one of the resident artists could produce a picture of both in a task group with their escorts........
SSBN replacement is being done with the US. The nuclear non proliferation treaty means that we cannot share our nuclear weapons. We can cooperate with the Americans to build our own, but we cannot share. Same with France. Therefore it won't be likely that the UK and France will start swapping recipes for thermonuclear weapons. Besides which, the UK and France rarely seem to have common interests - at least not as often as us and the Americans.
Second, successors deterrent is not QNLZ or QEC carriers. Come on guys... Let's at least pretend we are trying to stay on or near topic
Finally, third of my two things, no QNLZ will not be carrying ICBMs, unless Enigmatically knows something he can't disclose?!
Without the abilities members like SWO have mentioned the carrier will have operational limitations on acting independantly in a high threat scenario perhaps the R.N had believed they were getting a carrier that could have been developed to catobar capabilities and like many were later disapointed ,the R.N planners who engage in various scenarios with these capital ships will be aware of the strengths and increased risk of limitations of some operation for deployments .