Page 5 of 22 FirstFirst 1234567891011121315 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 324

Thread: Airbus A400M News and Discussion Thread

  1. #61
    Senior Member Herman the II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    5,224

    Default


  2. #62
    Senior Member Steak-Sauce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saupreiß, Obacht!
    Posts
    9,197

    Default

    Oh my God Herman! These pics are just awesome.. I will fap all day!
    Thanks a freakin' lot!!

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,713

    Default

    looks good but unfortunatley it looks like its missed the boat due to the delays.

  4. #64
    Senior Member Chimera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bordeaux, France
    Posts
    2,689

    Default

    French Order could be reduced to 35....

    http://secretdefense.blogs.liberatio...e-combat-.html


  5. #65
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chimera View Post
    French Order could be reduced to 35....

    http://secretdefense.blogs.liberatio....html#comments

    Don't derail the thread! Awesome pics are awesome! ( )

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    4,083

  7. #67
    Senior Member -Max2-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    an obscure forum
    Posts
    2,154

    Default

    Third A400M takes to the air

    By Craig Hoyle

    Airbus Military has enjoyed two notable firsts in its A400M programme, with the debut flight of development aircraft MSN003 having been achieved while its first two aircraft were also airborne.

    Flown from the company's San Pablo final assembly site near Seville, Spain, MSN003 took off at 13:57 local time with a crew of five, including experimental test pilots Tony Flynn and Francois Barre.

    "The addition of MSN3 to the fleet is great news, and will let us push ahead even more rapidly with the flying programme," says Airbus head of flight operations Fernando Alonso



    As of 9 July, the A400M test fleet had logged 100 test flights and a combined 400 flight hours, the EADS company says. This represents continued steady progress since last month's Berlin air show, where MSN001 made its show debut after around 250h had been amassed by the fleet.

    Airbus Military will have five test aircraft available by mid-2011, with these required to fly a combined total of 3,700h during development testing of the A400M. The transport is expected to enter service around late 2012, following a delivery delay of around three years.

    Carrying a medium instrumentation load, MSN003 will be dedicated to tasks including proving the A400M's autopilot and navigation systems. The aircraft will be assigned to test duties conducted from Airbus's Toulouse site in France.

    MSN001 will arrive in the UK on 16 July ahead of its weekend participation in the Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire. The aircraft will then take part in the daily flying display at the Farnborough air show from 19-22 July.


    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...o-the-air.html

  8. #68
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    Germany is supposedly reducing the number of A400M following budget cuts

  9. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    4,083

    Default

    This project is starting to look like... well, fail.

  10. #70
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default

    53 instead of 60 is not dramatic... or not as bad as cancelling everything like SA did .. traitors

  11. #71
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    461

    Default

    I hope the UK pulls out if possbile. I believe the RAF is cutting back on the number of types of airframes they're flying, and I'd much rather they just forget about this one rather than lose something the F3's. The C130's still have a long way to go.

  12. #72
    Senior Member signatory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Terra firma
    Posts
    10,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    53 instead of 60 is not dramatic... or not as bad as cancelling everything like SA did .. traitors
    They might still buy some in the future... just can't commit now. I think that goes for some other countries too.. right now it's not very popular to take big commitments but that doesnt mean the need has gone away.

  13. #73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForQueenAndCountry View Post
    I hope the UK pulls out if possbile. I believe the RAF is cutting back on the number of types of airframes they're flying, and I'd much rather they just forget about this one rather than lose something the F3's. The C130's still have a long way to go.
    A400 has been specifically designed based on current needs. The order will go ahead, but for 22 rather than the initial 25. The UK also needs the workshare from this project.

  14. #74
    Senior Member oldsoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Turning gold into sh*t
    Posts
    9,241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ForQueenAndCountry View Post
    I hope the UK pulls out if possbile. I believe the RAF is cutting back on the number of types of airframes they're flying, and I'd much rather they just forget about this one rather than lose something the F3's. The C130's still have a long way to go.
    A400m is NOT a C130 replacement. Rather different aircraft filling a rather different need.

  15. #75
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    London England
    Posts
    461

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldsoak View Post
    A400m is NOT a C130 replacement. Rather different aircraft filling a rather different need.
    Well what do we need it for on top of the C17 and different C130's? It can't be a replacement tanker or nimrod. What role does it have that is unique enough to bring it into the RAF keeping in mind they are ready to cut back on the amount of aircraft types we fly?

    edit: it seems the RAF ordered more c17's due to the delays and issues with the a400M which leads me to believe they serve a similar role. Which takes us back to my first questions. Why ad the a400m to the arsenal?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •