That's how I read it too. FRES SV is already a considerable way along the development road, plus it's imperitive to get it in servic asap, with the Scimitar and other variants struggling against the current threats.
£16bn really puts into perspective the endless BS about saving £500m (or whatever) by axing the second CVF!
I admit to most of the F-35 saga going over my head, but as I understand it the yanks are having big problems with the Dave-B too. Even with a CAS loadout (as opposed to our requirement for this mud-mover to do everything) they are having problems with the bring-back capability for the USS America class. So it stands to reason that SRVL could be as important to them as it is for us.Do we have any reliable idea of the price difference between a B and C model F35 btw? I know about the earlier article about the SRVL research going on, but I'm thinking this is either a case of the left hand not knowing what the right is doing at the MoD, or they are keeping their options open (remember we are also researching our own type of EMALS, "EMCAT", according to an article a few months back). Oh the joy if we decided to go CTOL after all. Fingers crossed as ever.
Given the potential savings at stake (I don't think anyone knows the actual unit costs yet), £7m quid spent on SRVL isn't that big a deal, particularly when the yanks may be picking up the bill themselves anyway.



Reply With Quote

