There's so much retardation it your post, I don't know where to begin. Not to mention that it was hard to understand it in places because of your spelling and bizarre grammar. Think before you post; people here may be religious and if so then they are probably going to be offended by your post.Originally Posted by mack8
And what the hell are you talking about.."that mobster from Vatican who tried to cover everything up - and probably is a pedophile himself , judging by his face -called pope ?" That's poor. Don't bother next time.
In regards to what you said about not seeing action taken against those priests, the Pope recently ordered an investigation into child abuse.
Are you high? This makes me think so: "their inexistent flying god who shoot lightings out of his ass says so"
It's hard to be normal when you're not allowed to have any *** at all.
I think it was a big mistake whan Vatican forbid Catholic priests to marry.
This way, priests can only suffer and/or develop some twisted type of ******ity - and on the other hand - church becomes attractive to weirdos who are not interested in normal ****** experiences like marriage love life.
But at the same time - they should preach about it.
To me it's all so very confusing.
the vow of celibacy is freely taken, noone twists anyones arm to take it
But you have to admit that it's easier for men who are not so attracted toward women...
And I really don't see why man who wants to have a wife is not fit to preach about the same matters to people.
Isn't "family" most sacred thing in Catholicism?
There's even something called "holy family"?
So why is priest not allowed to practicise that and be a good example of what is he preaching of?
Ill have to take your word for it
"family" is one of the sacred things
"The Holy Family" refers to Joseph, Mary and Jesus, however the priests and monks try to live by Jesus's exsample
there are christian groups that do lead through example of good family life, how successful are they? got to ask someone of that group
perhaps you should talk with a priest, if you have a courage to face a 'pedofile' *rolleyes*
I think that person should be allowed to be a priest even if he is not acting like Jesus in this particular aspect of life.
There are much more important characteristics which can qualify man to be "shepherd" of people than this one
Most of these cases are bogus. As you can see by the title of the thread, the priest has only been charged.
In my town a local priest was accused by a couple different men of having molested them, the local paper pretty much ****ounced him guilty. Turns out though, that this priest wasn't even ordained at the time that the supposed abuse took place, not to mention didn't even arrive in town until about ten years ago.
Do you suppose the paper ran a single story vindicating him? Your a ridiculous idiot if you think the answer is yes.
Everybody is allowed to be a priest and have family, but not in RC church. Nobody has any obligation to be Catholic or even to be Christian. The same like I do not care about rules existing in some Tibet monastery, I don't understand why so many not-Catholics are concerned about rules in RC church.
Because of growing number of accusations for child molesting which often include pedophilia, of course.
And some people, including me - like to discuss important matters, like molesting children which did not choose to be Catholics, but were baptized when they were babies.
So, if children are unwillingly exposed to priests - that priests should be better than perverts.
Of course, baptizing practice is is the same in Orthodox christian church... - in Judaism and Islam, too...and when some of their priests misbehaves - it's a theme to discuss, too.
Yeah but does he dive when he's barely touched in front of the goal? DOES HE?
Yeah. Thanks for your story about one thing that happened once in you life. I can now dismiss any other case, which seem to pop up from time to time, where a priest is accused of god damn fucking a kid. THose paedophiles are, as it turns out, apparently just framed. Thanks. I can now sleep better at night.
Who? Priest? Child? Pope? God? Please explain, for I really can't figure out what you're talking about...
(and I hate football, so that's additional problem for me when trying to understand your picturesque questions
The Priest. Who is Italian. You see, the World Cup is currently happening and the Italian team is well know for diving on the ground and screaming like women whenever they get slightly bumped by an opponent. So you see, my humor was topical, localized to a specific nationality, and my faux outrage was manufactured, as if diving in a football game was more unforgivable than molesting children.
So there you have it. In the end we have a Priest that denies any wrongdoing and people who believe he did heinous things to innocents. Hopefully the truth comes out and if guilty he is punished.
Whats stupid about all of this, is that i know a lady who was *not*, i repeat *not* molested who sued the church for molestation, as she put it "cause its easy money", because a friend of hers, who was molested, asked her to join a class action. On the other hand, i know of a teacher who was accused of molestation because a girl at the school got a bad mark, so she thought she would punish him. Even though her vexatious complaint came out, he was still tarred with the brush. Yet the girl got away scot free.
If the priest is guilty, punishment should occur, by putting him in general population.
On the upside, the lady who was not molested got ripped of by her lawyers, who took most of her payment. Blood money to blood suckers.
Thank you, Sir
Unfortunately - Catholic Church is against civil processing of their priests in civil courts. Vatican makes it's own investigations, which are not transparent to the (interested) public...
Last edited by Auu; 06-20-2010 at 09:20 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
