If they go for another color than brown on their equipment they must be the dumbest dudes alive. Because brown IS the universal color, and one of the most common color for terrain anywhere in the world.
Continued...Originally Posted by Soldier Systems
Of the Camo patterns that were up for testing when they were looking at MultiCam, Bull Dog Tactical's Mirage pattern did pretty well and I liked it. I'm guessing Crye will be in on this, and I also wonder what Hyde Definition might do since they just introduced other patterns to their PennCot line.
If they go for another color than brown on their equipment they must be the dumbest dudes alive. Because brown IS the universal color, and one of the most common color for terrain anywhere in the world.
Uh...Brown doesn't work. Accessories will most likely be made from the transition pattern.
I just find it annoying that the Army must re do the same tests every other year or so, and when they're complete, throw out the results, and do nothing. This at least sounds like a semi-new idea, but really, 4 seporate patterns? Common, that's more than a little annoying. Solid color gear would also raise an issue. No matter how great your uniform is, at least a third of your body will be covered by that solid color of gear. Why the hell don't we go with an off the shelf pattern that works (ie, MultiCam, Brush All Over, Mirage, etc), and design the dedicated variants (that we really don't need right now anyway) of that pattern over the next two years, instead of sticking with ICUs until the whole kit and caboodle is ready?
Three patterns for wear and one pattern for gear. My guess is that Crye will come up with three patterns, MultiCam will be their transition pattern and the pattern for gear will be a mix of MultiCam and the Desert and Forest patterns.
It seems that they actually want to spend money wisely and do this right, hopefully the Army opens up the checkbook.
I don't know. I just don't see the Army going back to Crye after stubbing them with MultiCam the first time. Even now, we're not buying Crye MC, but Army designed everything.
Who knows though, I didn't expect the Army to admit that MultiCam won the A-Stan trials.
Could save them a lot of money and time: Woodland/Universal - MARPAT with a dark sepia or gray to replace the black; Desert - desert MARPAT; gear and accessories - same as woodland.
Jesus Christ, what the fuck was wrong with the DCU & BDU Pattern then? Friggen PEO Soldier jackasses couldnt pour piss out a boot with instructions printed on the heel.
Screw it, give me back My OD Jungle Fatigues but add elbow/knee/ass reinforcements
I was issued Woodland BDUs and kit in the '90s. Worked fine. Still use it for hunting/camping. Got some ACU/MOLLE kit along the way, but I'm drifting back to the old ALICE gear for outdoors use. Cheaper, less gadgety, and no fanboy wow factor.
There were two separate trials ongoing. You've got the full blown version which is comparing a wide range and the battalion level doing MC vs UCP-D. The batt. level tests are a stop gap measure. The Natick/PEO-Solidier trials are going to determine an overall winner. These long term tests may explain why many can't wear it in the CONUS.
MC has a big foot in the door with the batt. level stuff and someone seems to have some serious influence over at the selection committee. I'm going to laugh if they go with All Over Brush (beat MC in all phase 1 tests) or a "digital" Multicam using the UCP digital pattern.