Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Party Geert Wilders: We should attack Iran

  1. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJHH View Post
    Great, intellectual elaboration.
    Intellectual people understand that elaboration isn't necessary to say that Wilders is a fool

  2. #17
    Senior Member JJHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    In your heart and mind..
    Posts
    4,026

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaaskop View Post
    Intellectual people understand that elaboration isn't necessary to say that Wilders is a fool
    too many Dutch hippies on this forum.. :P

  3. #18
    Faux Phallus Smuggler
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    6,288

    Default

    well, i suppose we should invade iran if they had destructive weapons.......just like those mysterious WMD's in iraq

  4. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJHH View Post
    too many Dutch hippies on this forum.. :P
    What's your definition of a hippie?

  5. #20

    Default

    I would say that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were a greater threat to my personal security than Iran.

  6. #21
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    .........
    Posts
    6,134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bacilluspolymyxa View Post
    I would say that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were a greater threat to my personal security than Iran.
    Yeah, untill they detonate THE BOMB in the middle of Scotland, you naive bastard.

  7. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StormzSTA View Post
    Yeah, untill they detonate THE BOMB in the middle of Scotland, you naive bastard.
    They will get a punch in the face just like the last would be bomber.

  8. #23
    Senior Member SoSo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,635

    Default

    Or maybe a get out of jail free card, just to smooth things over for BP in its oil exploration negotiations. Oh wait, I forgot, that was done on "compassionate grounds." What a joke. However, real compassion was shown by the people of Lockerbie, who opened their homes to Americans who came to Scotland to identify and recover the remains of their loved ones, gave them food and showed them every kindness. Some of the women of that town even took the clothing of the victims from the police, after all possible forensic evidence had been recovered, washed these articles and gave them back to their families.
    But in any case, it's Israel that should be worried about a bomb going off in the middle of their country, not Scotland. I'm not one of those people who believes we can let Iran develop nukes, and deter their use, like we've done with North Korea.
    Last edited by SoSo; 12-15-2010 at 05:13 PM.

  9. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James Phillips View Post
    Or maybe a get out of jail free card, just to smooth things over for BP in its oil exploration negotiations. Oh wait, I forgot, that was done on "compassionate grounds." What a joke.
    Well commerce often trumps ethics a sad but true fact of life and and whatever country you dwell in you will find your politicians have tolerated terror on others.
    Quote Originally Posted by James Phillips View Post
    However, real compassion was shown by the people of Lockerbie, who opened their homes to Americans who came to Scotland to identify and recover the remains of their loved ones, gave them food and showed them every kindness. Some of the women of that town even took the clothing of the victims from the police, after all possible forensic evidence had been recovered, washed these articles and gave them back to their families.
    I was living in the area at the time of the bombing and the event had a significant impact on the psyche of the local population.
    Quote Originally Posted by James Phillips View Post
    But in any case, it's Israel that should be worried about a bomb going off in the middle of their country, not Scotland. I'm not one of those people who believes we can let Iran develop nukes, and deter their use, like we've done with North Korea.
    I have always believed that the Iranians are a bit wary of the Israelis and are fully aware of the reprecussions of a first strike.
    Last edited by Mr Gently Benevolent; 12-16-2010 at 04:58 PM.

  10. #25
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Smolensk
    Posts
    693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StormzSTA View Post
    Yeah, untill they detonate THE BOMB in the middle of Scotland, you naive bastard.
    There is much more chances that THE BOMB would be Pakistanian origin, not Iranian.
    Despite all minuses of current Iran regime. It is stable country with predictable foreign politic. Main issue about Iran atomic bomb is not fear of using it as terrorist weapon, but fear that Iranian regional domination could not been contaimed after that by military. Considering world hunger to oil this is much more threat to capitalist world.

    In case of terrorists real axis of evil is Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. But no one cares about this.

  11. #26
    Daddy's little boy RSone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Age
    23
    Posts
    10,976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JJHH View Post
    too many Dutch hippies on this forum.. :P
    Wilders is not a fool, however it appears the majority of 'his' MP's are. Now if you'll excuse me, i need to go make up some scientific evidence for that last statement.
    Honestly though, this is like the time Iran warne us that it would reconsider the ties between the countries if Wilders was allowed to release Fitna. With all due respect to the Iranians on here, our government really doesn't give a flying pelican shyte as to how Tehran feels about The Netherlands. It is like Minister Rosenthal(OMG JEW) said, Iran does deserve a lot of the criticism leveled against it.

  12. #27
    Milo Drinker of Death Flagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The (South)Island of Misfit Toys
    Posts
    12,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bacilluspolymyxa View Post
    I would say that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were a greater threat to my personal security than Iran.
    For me, I'd edit it a bit:

    I'd say Saudi Arabia represents a potentially bigger economic security threat to me than Iran and that Pakistan represents a potentially bigger physical security threat to me than Iran.

    But to confuse matter I would say that Iran represents a potentially bigger geopolitical threat than either Saudi Arabia or Pakistan in the long-term if they do not develop into a country with a foreign policy that is largely cooperative with the West.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •