Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Secret Soviet laser tank 1K17

  1. #1
    Senior Member alexz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935

    Default Secret Soviet laser tank 1K17

    In 1990 the body of the machine was built and after the tests wass added to the army in 1992. the developers received the National Prize once again. That was the time when the USSR was 10 years forward in the lasers construction in comparison to other countries.



    http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2...-technologies/

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexz View Post
    In 1990 the body of the machine was built and after the tests wass added to the army in 1992. the developers received the National Prize once again. That was the time when the USSR was 10 years forward in the lasers construction in comparison to other countries.



    http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2...-technologies/
    I understand that the purpose of this tank was to blind enemy soldiers. This was NOT the first time this was attempted. UK naval vessels had such systems, to try to defend incoming jets. I read about it in "One Hundred Days: The Memoirs of the Falklands Battle Group Commander". Yes in Falklands conflict. Most of you were not even born yet.

  3. #3
    Senior Member khalifah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    We are not in Texas anymore Toto...
    Age
    24
    Posts
    7,784

    Default

    thats a monster of a support system. I wonder what kind of battery power was needed.

    heres some info i gathered,...

    the 1K17 tank—which used 66-pound synthetic ruby rods at the heart of its laser system—wasn't designed to destroy enemy fighters. Its objective was to blind pilots and weapons systems, dazzling optical and electronic mechanisms even under the most severe weather conditions.
    http://gizmodo.com/5715192/the-secret-soviet-laser-tank

  4. #4
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    hiding in the bushes near Chengdu
    Posts
    6,103

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbamil View Post
    I understand that the purpose of this tank was to blind enemy soldiers. .
    not quite

    http://otvaga2004.narod.ru/publ_w7_2010/0033_laser.htm

    google translation:
    It was a complex of new generation with automatic search and guidance on glossy object multichannel laser radiation (solid-state laser on aluminum oxide Al2O3) in which a small portion of aluminum atoms substituted by trivalent chromium, or simply - in a ruby crystal. To create a population inversion using optical pumping, ie, lighting, crystal, ruby powerful flash of light. Rubin shaped into a cylindrical rod whose ends carefully polished, silver-plated, and serve as a mirror for the laser. To highlight the ruby rod used pulsed xenon discharge flash lamp, through which the discharged battery of high voltage capacitors. Flash lamp has the shape of a spiral tube, twine around the ruby rod. Under the action of powerful light pulse in a ruby rod creates a population inversion, and thanks to the mirrors, lasing is excited, the duration of which slightly less than the duration of the flash lamp pumping. Especially for the "compression" has been grown artificial crystal weighing about 30 kg - "laser gun" in this sense cost "a lot of money." New installation required large amounts of energy. For its power powerful generators, battery-powered auxiliary power unit (APU) was used.

  5. #5
    Senior Member alexz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,935

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptMorgan68 View Post
    It was a complex of new generation with automatic search and guidance on glossy object multichannel laser radiation (solid-state laser on aluminum oxide Al2O3) in which a small portion of aluminum atoms substituted by trivalent chromium
    That's exactly what I suspected.

  6. #6
    Milo Drinker of Death Flagg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The (South)Island of Misfit Toys
    Posts
    12,931

    Default

    I vaguely recall the US having a system in development to blind enemy optics(and their operators) with the acronym CLAW or somesuch....I think I recall it being cancelled for being inhumane.

  7. #7
    Member Veni Valboro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexz View Post
    that's exactly what i suspected.
    ........lmfao!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Damian90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    2,249

    Default

    Flagg
    I vaguely recall the US having a system in development to blind enemy optics(and their operators) with the acronym CLAW or somesuch....I think I recall it being cancelled for being inhumane.
    They had many systems, one laser defence system was even fielded in limited numbers in combat during ODS on some M2 IFV's, it was AN/VLQ-7 Active Protection System, that scanned field with one laser beam to search enemy optics, and with secojd stronger beam it destroyed these optics... it was however put back in magazines and was not seen later because of concerns about blinding humans.


  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    I vaguely recall the US having a system in development to blind enemy optics(and their operators) with the acronym CLAW or somesuch....I think I recall it being cancelled for being inhumane.
    I guess that makes UK Royal navy is inhuman since they had laser devices to blind human eyes installed on their ships during the Falklands war.
    Last edited by dbamil; 12-23-2010 at 06:00 PM.

  10. #10
    para944
    Guest

    Default

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	field_laser_9.jpg 
Views:	1247 
Size:	171.5 KB 
ID:	146350 Ok that's just for the record. (Obviously the DIA was aware of the Development of lasers by the Soviet's)



    So has the 1K17 ever been used in some conflict?

  11. #11
    Senior Member [WDW]Megaraptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Making people mad...
    Posts
    6,006

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbamil View Post
    I guess that makes UK Royal navy is inhuman since they had laser devices to blind human eyes installed on their ships during the Falklands war.
    These were later banned by international treaty, correct?

  12. #12
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexz View Post
    In 1990 the body of the machine was built and after the tests wass added to the army in 1992. the developers received the National Prize once again. That was the time when the USSR was 10 years forward in the lasers construction in comparison to other countries.



    http://englishrussia.com/index.php/2...-technologies/
    Funny thing is before the Russian article that Gizmodo found and that's all over the net. I found this same picture in a thread several weeks ago on this very board, where the poster asked it to be identified. Gizmodo didn't do their homework and just took the Russian article and summarized it. Even though our posters had been revealing this so called "secret" way before Gizmodo got to it. But of course the press loves hype.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Climber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buenos Aires in body, the beautiful and green Sharon in my heart
    Age
    44
    Posts
    8,003

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbamil View Post
    I guess that makes UK Royal navy is inhuman since they had laser devices to blind human eyes installed on their ships during the Falklands war.
    Source? It was used?


    I researched the war extensively and AFAIK no Argentine resulted with that kind of injury.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •