Reply With QuoteIt's an election year so no.Originally Posted by MUSHROOM123
They have never experienced war and think it's a game. Even if here is someone surviving veterans they never know what is civil war when the neighbor turns into an animal who tortured, raped and killed. Thats is not game, that is hell.
It is better to pray it never does not feel and not to write nonsense.
It's an election year so no.
The solution is to immediately cease violence, and to move to amend the Constitution and parliamentary elections. This Asad accepted.
What the Middle East needs is a rebirth of the Ottoman Empire.
And who can apply this solution?
Try to convince the Syrians to endorse Assad's constitution. For them it is too late, too little.
This fits the neo Ottomans ambitions of Erdogan.
Erdogan's problem is he is looking in the wrong direction.This fits the neo Ottomans ambitions of Erdogan.
You mean at Greece/Cyprus/Israel?
You are new to the forum and you know nothing about the background of the people you are discussing with.
Tortures, rapes, killes… It's already what happens in Syria, isn't it?Even if here is someone surviving veterans they never know what is civil war when the neighbor turns into an animal who tortured, raped and killed. Thats is not game, that is hell.
It is better to pray it never does not feel and not to write nonsense.
Indeed. This makes me think of him more as a Turk than an Ottoman.
Or a Sunni Caliphate under Saud .....not........ It needs grass root democracy resistant to foreign influence i.e. Arab Democratic Republics.
What the Arab world/Middle East needs is a 100 Years War. Seems like they're on good trajectory to achieve that.
I am not saying I want that but Europeans had their 100 Years War which brought certain interesting developments like understanding that religion is not the be all and end all of political life and organization. Maybe there is something in the human mind that makes such realizations possible only after prolonged agony. Not saying I wish that just trying to read the future best I can and that conclusion seems to be most reasonable.
What the world needs, is definitely not some Middle East Super Power, with no tradition of democracy.
From what I understand "democracy" is still considered a "western word". It's not like they think it's a bad idea, but it's a western idea, so therefor there's some resistance to adopting it.
My appologies. They might have to become federation like Bosnia in cantons with a president for each group alawite, sunni and kurdish.
After Tito died they did not know what to do so they had a presidium of 6 people one from each republic taking turn.
Last edited by themacedonian; 02-25-2012 at 03:56 AM.
'US to announce aerial blockade on Syria'
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...194506,00.htmlUS readies for possibility of intervention without UN resolution, Asharq Al-Awsat reports, citing US military official; plan to include humanitarian aid to Syrian refugees on Turkey's border
The Pentagon is readying for the possibility of intervention in Syria, aiming to halt Syrian President Bashsar Assad's violent crackdown on protesters, the newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat reported Saturday, citing a US military offical.
According to the official, the intervention scenario calls for the establishment of a buffer zone on the Turkish border, in order to receive Syrian refugees. The Red Cross would then provide the civilians humanitarian aid, before NATO crews would arrive from Turkey and join the efforts.
The measure would pave the way for the US to declare an aerial blockade on Syria.
The intercession is to be modeled after NATO's efforts in Kosovo, which brought an end to the Serbian control of the region. NATO's plan of action included prolonged aerial shelling.
The US' diplomatic efforts have yet to yield an effective international resolution that would stop the bloodshed. More than 100 protesters have died over the weekend alone, human rights activists said.
Posting Permissions
