Reply With QuoteI do not consider this organization as a beacon of truth.Originally Posted by Camera
Uk government defines Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation, didn't stop Blair singing Assad's praises when he was in London!
Saudi-state media, as reliable as Press TV...
I do not consider this organization as a beacon of truth.
WTF this has to do with Assad being a criminal?
Then you post a RT video
I mean the U.S. State Department.
This is an American pro-NATO forum and not a Jihadist one. Read its rules and comply to them instead of wasting my time.
This overrides the fact that the U.S. State Department when he decides who is a terrorist and who is not, based on political interests rather than objective reality?Then you post a RT video
I'm sure those activists would be in the know over what Assad's personal security procedures are.
Sounds about right I would think
Lots of conflicting info in there. They claim 41 at first, then 103 total, with "one a day" in October and November.
43 doesn't sound unreasonable considering shoot downs, normal attrition during high ops tempos, and what is lost when storming bases. IIRC one helicopter base was attacked earlier this year with 11 Hips destroyed, though likely not all of them operational at the time.
Interesting who the next time will be declared a bloody dictator and a criminal?
What is your point in any of this besides being a trolling asshat?
I would say you are walking a pretty thin ice at the moment.
What do you want to say with that picture?Interesting who the next time will be declared a bloody dictator and a criminal?
Well, yes, you have a certain point that here is some political interest in the definiton of a terrorist. okay. Fair enough.Interesting who the next time will be declared a bloody dictator and a criminal?
Anyway, it was all about Assad - but instead of contributing to the issue at hand you seem to go all nuts at the US state department. At least I didn't see anything regarding Assad and the topic, which leaves it just at what many other posters said: trolling. Be careful with it..
http://rt.com/news/lavrov-brahimi-syria-meeting-056/Brahimi-Lavrov talks: Syria facing choice between 'hell' or political process
Syrian-led talks are the only way to reach peace in Syria, otherwise the country will descend into dire sectarian conflict, UN-Arab League envoy Lakhdar Brahimi said following his meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow.
*Lavrov said there is no way to make Syrian President Bashar Assad shift his firm position of not stepping down from his office. On the other hand, the newly set up Syrian Opposition Coalition has proclaimed in its declaration there would be no dialogue with the current Syrian regime.
“A collection of factors is stalling the [peace] process, but in particular it is an absolutely uncompromising attitude on both parts,” the FM said. “This refusal to compromise should be overturned. For that, global players who support either party to the conflict should be putting across a unified message: stop the bloodshed and sit to negotiations.”
On Saturday, the head of the Syrian Opposition Coalition, Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib, said the group will start talks with Moscow only after Russia “clearly states they denounce the cruelty of the Syrian regime and says goodbye to Assad.”
At the same time, Lavrov has stated on numerous occasions that Russia will not try to persuade the Syrian President to quit as it is only up to the Syrian people to decide if Assad must go. The veteran Russian diplomat supported Brahimi’s statement, saying that there are still chances for “a political solution”...
Posting Permissions
