Thread: Russian Armed Forces News & Discussion thread

  1. #2461
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,746

    Default

    Hyde , Thanks for putting up that numbers thats so useful.

    The Chopper Development Chart is interesting , There is a new 5th Gen Strike Chopper and Ka-65 , so the Ka-65 will replace the Ka-28/29 Naval ASW chopper ?

    There is this new High Speed Chopper in R&D probably they would also see some initial production

  2. #2462
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    13,058

    Default

    Russian Navy buying Icelandic Gavia Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
    The Russian Navy is buying eight AUVs from Teledyne Gavia for a total of €19 millions. Three of the autonomous underwater vehicles will be delivered this. The remaining five will be delivered in 2013 and 2014 according to russian paper Nezavisimaya Gazeta reports.
    http://www.navyrecognition.com/index...sk=view&id=360

    Russia has no such UUS "home made" ?

  3. #2463
    Senior Member YevgenyP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Pillau
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xav View Post
    Russian Navy buying Icelandic Gavia Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

    http://www.navyrecognition.com/index...sk=view&id=360

    Russia has no such UUS "home made" ?
    If even yes, doubt homemade ones can provide such level.

  4. #2464
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    13,058

    Default

    Russian Defense Ministry Plans to Order Extra Borey & Yasen Nuclear Submarines for Russian Navy
    In addition to the 16 nuclear submarines purchase which is outlined by the state armament program for the period until 2020 the Russian Defense Ministry plans to buy four extra nuclear submarines.

    Army general Nikolai Makarov said, "If there appears such possibility we will order two additional project 955 (Borey class) submarines of and two extra project 855 (Yasen class) submarines."
    http://www.navyrecognition.com/index...sk=view&id=362

  5. #2465
    Senior Member metberkut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Age
    23
    Posts
    2,448

    Default

    ^Interesting.

    But i thought the deal was actually 10 of each a bit back, not 8 of each? Or am i just remembering wrongly?

  6. #2466
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by metberkut View Post
    ^Interesting.

    But i thought the deal was actually 10 of each a bit back, not 8 of each? Or am i just remembering wrongly?
    Looks like 8 is the low goal if the yard can't work out it's construction issues and that if possible they'll bring it up to 10 each.

  7. #2467
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    620

    Default

    I don't think you are. I remember this also.

  8. #2468
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,945

    Default

    Only 8 are financed.

    Someone in the government recently said "maybe 10", but the military has been noncommittal about this. One the one hand, they don't want to tell their bosses that they are idiots who don't understand procurement, on the other hand, they can't exactly wave a magic wand and make it 10.

    8 is a safe, firm number. 10 is just someone's random idea.

  9. #2469
    Senior Member African-European's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,365

    Default

    [LEFT][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Russia to bargain for Gabala with scan with on alternatives

    Russia has been bargaining with Azerbaijan about a key station in its ballistic missile early warning system (BMEWS). Should the negotiations fail, the station may be pulled out and replaced by a new one to be built in Russia. This meets the recently endorsed new approaches to BMEWS radar field configuration. [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    The growing appetite

    [LEFT][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The case in point is the currently modernized Daryal-type BMEWS radar station (RS) located in the vicinity of Gabala, Azerbaijan. For Russia, Gabala is of strategic importance as controlling the sector to the south of its borders. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]“The talks on Gabala continue. The first round was quite constructive,” Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov told RIA Novosti Tuesday. “Soon we will agree with our Azerbaijani colleagues on the dates when the Russian delegation can leave for Azerbaijan for further talks.” [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Earlier Kommersant reported with reference to its sources in the Defense Ministry that Baku wants to increase the annual lease payment from $7 to $300 million. Just a few months ago, its appetite did not extend beyond $15 million[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]“This amount is exorbitant and totally unjustified; we will press for its considerable reduction. We still hope to come to an agreement,” a Defense Ministry source told Kommersant. According to another source, Russia might as well evacuate Gabala, “If Baku fails to moderate its appetite.”[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]For now, Gabala has an essential role to play, watching the strategically important southern sector (including possible missile launches from the Indian Ocean), and registering Iranian missile launches (also significant in the current geopolitical situation).[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]But a hypothetical and highly unlikely pullout scenario may still be on the cards, and then, as a stopgap, Russia will have to speedily commission the second stage of its new-generation RS near Armavir, Krasnodar Territory.[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    A hole-ridden net as inheritance

    [LEFT][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]But how has it come about that the Russian BMEWS is dependent on a foreign state’s whims?[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The disposition of BMEWS radars in the USSR obeyed the language of art. 6 of the Soviet-American Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems (1972), which prescribed to deploy outward-oriented BMEWS radars solely in the periphery of each country’s national territory. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]This explains why the radar field came to include stations at Mukachevo and Mys Khersones, Ukraine; Gabala, Azerbaijan; Skrunda, Latvia; and Sary-Shagan, Kazakhstan.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]After 1991, this entire infrastructure was inherited by the newly independent countries that sprung up in the territory of the former USSR. Russia was left with one station near Olenegorsk, Kola Peninsula, one in Pechora and two abandoned projects – Mishelevka and Abalkovo – near Irkutsk. Oriented in the northwestern direction so that it might watch the airspace over Yakutia and beyond, Abalkovo, in addition to everything else, was being built in violation of the ABM Treaty, something that caused protracted squabbles with the United States.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]To plug the hole in the Western sector, the military command speedily put back into service and licked into shape the Volga RS at Gantsevichi, Belarus. It had been under construction since 1981 with an eye to meeting the challenge posed by U.S.-owned Eurostrategic Pershing-2 missiles. But after the signing of the Treaty on the Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (1987), it was no longer urgently needed to have the station and the project was allowed to drift. It again emerged as a priority after 1998: completed in a rush, the radar was put on combat duty in 2000. [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    Voronezh to replace Daryal

    [LEFT][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Russia’s top military officials were greatly concerned about the situation where only the northern and northwestern sectors were protected, while the narrow sectors in the west and south were being leased and largely dependent on the stance of post-Soviet governments. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The potential for funding the national nuclear missile forces was stretched to the utmost both in the 1990s and thereafter. The Kremlin knew only too well that the deterrent was the sole thing that ensured Russia’s independence and territorial integrity even while the rest of the country was openly enthusiastic about the newly found Western allies. This is why the radar-field problem was addressed at the earliest opportunity. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The available BMEWS radars were in effect mammoth construction projects boasting huge reinforced-concrete shells, inside which active devices and equipment were installed. These ziggurats took a long time to build, which was followed by an equally protracted start-up period. Reorienting a station to another sector (let alone redeploying it to a different location) was out of the question. It was easier to blow it up and build a new one. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]A high depot readiness concept (HDR) was proposed as a new approach that envisaged the installation of easy-to-assemble frames for hanging large prefabricated radar modules. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]This made it possible to achieve three effects at once with the very first batch-produced Voronezh station.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]First, the construction time was curtailed, as were the construction costs, which is of no small importance under present-day circumstances. According to available data, the turn-key cost of one Voronezh installation is 1.5 billion rubles in 2005 prices. Moreover, it takes 12 to 16 months to assemble 23 prefabricated units on a prepared site. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]To compare: Daryal-type radar like the one at Gabala is made up of 4,000 units of equipment. Its cost in comparable prices would amount to 19.8 billion rubles and the time span required for its construction under the most favorable conditions is anywhere between 5 and 6 years. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Second, the module approach provides for easy scaling and modernization. None of the former models lent themselves to modernization since numerous problems cropped up when it came to installing equipment and laying the service lines inside a shell. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Third, a new-generation station can be disassembled and redeployed to a new location relatively quickly. That is not a sign of HDR radars’ new mobility, but an option like this can be easily contemplated several years in advance. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]High depot readiness morphing into full readiness[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Currently Russia is operating three Voronezh-type HDR radars: Armavir, Lekhtusi (near St. Petersburg), and, since recently, Kaliningrad (this one will become fully operational only in 2014). The fourth radar of the same type is under construction at Mishelevka near Irkutsk on the site of a demolished Daryal shell. [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The fifth radar will actually be the second stage of Armavir, which is Russia’s main hope for the hypothetical eventuality of having to withdraw Gabala from the BMEWS. The first stage is going to handle the southwestern sector, while the second stage, to be built directly behind Gabala and next to its twin, will control the southern and southeastern sector.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]In the meantime, the high depot readiness concept has been upgraded for more flexibility, with A.L. Mintz Radio Institute announcing its MARS project (Multifunctional Adaptive Radar System) also known as FDR RS (full depot readiness). [/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]This radar is being designed as a mobile and universal affair. As is cautiously specified, it is a “redeployable” model, which means that it is not a fully mobile vehicle-based radar, like those used by the air defense forces. Moreover, it should easily integrate with both the BMEWS and other related information systems involved in monitoring outer space, securing missile defense, and supporting non-strategic antimissile defenses, including ship-based components.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    [*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Given this approach, Gabala will certainly retain its significance as an element of Russia’s BMEWS, but it will gradually lose its critical importance.
    [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

    The views expressed in this article are the author’s and may not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.

    http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20120302/171688248.html


    Upgraded Il-76 plane to make maiden flight in the summer

    [LEFT][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Russia’s modernized Ilyushin Il-76MD-90A aircraft, also known as the Il-476, will conduct its maiden flight by the end of June, Ulyanovsk-based Aviastar aircraft maker said on Friday.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The Il-476 is an extensively modified variant of the Il-76 freighter, with new engines, reinforced wing, modernized cockpit, and heavier payload. The aircraft will be primarily built for the Russian Armed Forces and Emergencies Ministry.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]“Project 476 is our future,” Aviastar General Director Sergei Dementyev said.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Aviastar, which also manufactures super-heavy Antonov An-124 transport planes, expects to build up to ten of the Il-476 aircraft per year and is in talks with export customers including India and China as well as commercial customers.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]China canceled a contract agreed earlier with Russia for delivery of around 38 Il-76 transport and Il-78 tanker aircraft, after TAPO, the Uzbekistan-based Il-76 airframe producer said it could no longer deliver the airframes as production had slowed.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]Russia then had to move production to Aerostar in order to complete the Il-476 modification programs for the Russian Air Force.[/FONT][/COLOR][*******#010000][FONT=Georgia]The Russian Defense Ministry wants to buy up to 100 of the aircraft over ten years to replace existing Il-76s.

    http://en.rian.ru/mlitary_news/20120302/171691313.html[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

  10. #2470
    Member GunshipDemocracy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    who´s hotter? Madeleine vs Natalia
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sashko View Post
    That would be like buying Mercedes s600 to do furniture deliveries based on an assumption that you could potentially fit a couch in there, after throwing away the seats.
    Well it was just my educated guess why they might want to beef up ship active defenses? I thought about something like new version of Moskva helo carrier (Project 1123).

  11. #2471
    Member GunshipDemocracy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    who´s hotter? Madeleine vs Natalia
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YevgenyP View Post
    If even yes, doubt homemade ones can provide such level.
    it is a real shame for Russian Navy - especially that unmanned combat submarines would would add powerful component to Russian fleet with potential global reach...

  12. #2472
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GunshipDemocracy View Post
    it is a real shame for Russian Navy - especially that unmanned combat submarines would would add powerful component to Russian fleet with potential global reach...


    Excuse me but an unmanned combat submarines with potential global reach ? are you kidding me ?

  13. #2473
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    13,058

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubick View Post
    Excuse me but an unmanned combat submarines with potential global reach ? are you kidding me ?
    DARPA is working on such project... unmanned submarines with 3+ months endurance to trail SSK/Coastal subs... (not armed however)

  14. #2474
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Delete this.
    Last edited by Rubick; 03-02-2012 at 07:22 PM.

  15. #2475
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xav View Post
    DARPA is working on such project... unmanned submarines with 3+ months endurance to trail SSK/Coastal subs... (not armed however)
    Not the same thing as he suggests. Which is just stupid.

    unmanned underwater vehicle that are used by SSK or SSN for recon is one thing. Building a SSN and controlling it from freaking Moscow or what ever is another. It would need to be in shallow depth with it's mast out for that to be possible. Which would void the whole point of a submarine. Further more would you really want a unmanded nuke sub ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •