Page 5 of 409 FirstFirst 123456789101112131555105 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 6127

Thread: Russian Armed Forces News & Discussion thread

  1. #61
    Senior Member The Dane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    I'm so Danish, even my blood cells are Red and White
    Posts
    12,285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sepheronx View Post
    Look at where they are made.

    I can tell you exactly where.
    Yeah, but they are not developed there.
    China is just a big factory, they don't come up with anything new themselves.

  2. #62
    Making Canadians look bad sepheronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    23
    Posts
    8,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danskeren View Post
    Yeah, but they are not developed there.
    China is just a big factory, they don't come up with anything new themselves.
    No. But that is to go the way soon as well. Like how Japan took over with a lot of the high tech R&D (where the world was scared that they where going to reign supreme during the 80's supposedly). It is only a matter of time. R&D in Russia for technology still exists. But their manufacturing is crap (apparently). Most of it comes from Taiwan/China.

    Edit: Just to say, when my dad worked for Sperry Marine, he explained that a lot of components came from Japan.
    Last edited by sepheronx; 05-06-2011 at 03:55 PM. Reason: updated for interesting story

  3. #63
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sepheronx View Post
    What was the lack of production (other than money)? Outdated?
    At the time, the only problem was money.

    Now it is quite obsolete.

  4. #64
    Making Canadians look bad sepheronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    23
    Posts
    8,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by artjomh View Post
    At the time, the only problem was money.

    Now it is quite obsolete.
    I would guess so. Shame really.

  5. #65
    Senior Member Andy_UA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,362

    Default

    There was a project to finish the ship as a training ship proj,12441U "Borodino" but it seems it didn't take off.
    Here is some info - http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/1208914
    http://forums.airbase.ru/2001/02/t20...k-proekta.html

    The hull of it in Kaliningrad -



  6. #66
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    133

    Default

    Americans and Russians - both are very uncomfortable that the latest 'defence' chips would be made somewhere in Taiwan.

    Quote Originally Posted by Danskeren View Post
    China is just a big factory, they don't come up with anything new themselves.
    Loongson

  7. #67

    Default

    There is always conflicting numbers mentioned for SAP 2011-2020 spending by MOD,President and PM

    Putin mentions yesterday Defence modernization overdue – Putin

    He spoke about 3 trillion roubles to modernize defence industries and 20 trillion, to procure cutting-edge arms.

    So is it 20 Trillion roubles plus another 3 Trillion for R&D total 23 Trillion roubles.

    Or it is 19 Trillion roubles like president has been quoted.

    Can some one clarrify on the exact figures ?

  8. #68
    Senior Member Andy_UA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Age
    27
    Posts
    1,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Austin View Post
    So is it 20 Trillion roubles plus another 3 Trillion for R&D total 23 Trillion roubles.

    Or it is 19 Trillion roubles like president has been quoted.

    Can some one clarrify on the exact figures ?
    The 3 Trillion rouble is separate program. Its called "Federal target program - Modernisation of MIC 2011-2020" or smth.
    The SAP is rumoured around 19 Trillion for MoD, and 2-2.5 for FSB, MVD etc.
    Popovkin I guess in his last interview as a deputy defence minister said that numbers for MoD will not decrease and can only increase over time.

  9. #69

    Default

    I wonder what FSB would have to do with MOD funding , considering it does not come under it.

    What happened to SAP 2005-2015 program , will both the old SAP and new one will continue in parallel or will new SAP program absorb the old one including its funding ?

  10. #70
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,555

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Austin View Post
    I wonder what FSB would have to do with MOD funding , considering it does not come under it.
    State Armament Program covers MoD, FSB, police, drug control, correctional service, etc. Everyone who gets lethal equipment gets it under this program.

    FSB has a pretty big arms procurement budget (for Coast Guard).

  11. #71

    Default

    How strange the Coast Guard comes under FSB , while in most nations it would come under the Navy. It would be similar to USCG coming under the FBI.

    artjomh , are you aware if such massive funding ( ~ $800 Billion ) under SAP 2011-2020 , how would they fund such massive expenditure and what impact would it have on long term budget deficit ?

  12. #72
    Senior Member artjomh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    4,555

    Default

    The same way all budgets are funded: expanding economy + more mineral extraction taxes + sovereign bond issues.

    5-7 years ago, Russian federal budget used to balance if crude oil price averaged around $25/barrel. FY 2010 budget would have balanced if oil averaged $95/barrel. FY 2011 budget will balance if oil averages $115/barrel.

    So, yeah, all those toys cost (although it's still a relatively minor component, the main headache is social spending).

  13. #73
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Apologies if this has been posted here already. I looked and did not see it anywhere.

    Russia's Fading Army Fights Losing Battle to Reform Itself
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...s_mostpop_read




    Interesting reads here: http://russiamil.wordpress.com/2011/...rys-old-guard/

  14. #74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by artjomh View Post
    5-7 years ago, Russian federal budget used to balance if crude oil price averaged around $25/barrel. FY 2010 budget would have balanced if oil averaged $95/barrel. FY 2011 budget will balance if oil averages $115/barrel.
    By balance you would mean no deficit in the budget for that FY ..... I remember the Fin Minister saying any thing above $70 for Oil would be good.

    The Russian budget and for that matter is too much dependent on oil prices , they need to figure out a way how to decouple it by diversifying its economy or else its a disaster waiting to happen , Oil money should just be a surplus money .

    So, yeah, all those toys cost (although it's still a relatively minor component, the main headache is social spending).
    I would say its still better use of money then spending in shiny new weapons

  15. #75
    Making Canadians look bad sepheronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    23
    Posts
    8,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxII View Post
    Apologies if this has been posted here already. I looked and did not see it anywhere.

    Russia's Fading Army Fights Losing Battle to Reform Itself
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...s_mostpop_read




    Interesting reads here: http://russiamil.wordpress.com/2011/...rys-old-guard/
    That article, like most from Wall Street Journal, is a load of bollocks.

    Quote Originally Posted by artjomh View Post
    The same way all budgets are funded: expanding economy + more mineral extraction taxes + sovereign bond issues.

    5-7 years ago, Russian federal budget used to balance if crude oil price averaged around $25/barrel. FY 2010 budget would have balanced if oil averaged $95/barrel. FY 2011 budget will balance if oil averages $115/barrel.

    So, yeah, all those toys cost (although it's still a relatively minor component, the main headache is social spending).
    Hopefully they can reduce dependency on the raw natural resources, and start to rely on total economy of the nation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •