It's pretty simple. OBL's dead on theater was the best possible outcome.
That must be some beard she has...Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend
But yeah, for those who aren't convinced that we killed OBL, an official release of the photos will do jack****. It is impossible to argue with a conspiracy theorist.
Besides, as commanding mentioned, the pictures will be leaked anyways in a couple months.
It's pretty simple. OBL's dead on theater was the best possible outcome.
Already posted but these are high res. Graphic warning.
http://j.mp/ko5MbI
So who leaked this pics, Pakistani government?
Pretty sure these are just photos taken by locals.
Your a joke ..............
The time on them says 0230 and 0239, what time did the SEALs leave? Looks like they were taken with a decent camera not the average cellphone pics.
The photos [were], taken by a Pakistani security official who entered the compound after the early morning raid on Monday, show two men dressed in traditional Pakistani garb and one in a t-shirt, with blood streaming from their ears, noses and mouths.
Last edited by Icebergtz; 05-04-2011 at 08:24 PM.
Obama's decision to not release the pics is a crock in my opinion. I wished he really wouldnt have pussed out, but apparently he agreed with advice given to him.
Ah well we will see them sooner or later.
Australian Strategic Policy Institute analyst Raspal Khosa said the insurgency in Afghanistan was still overwhelmingly indigenous.
"About 90 per cent of insurgents are actually locals. There is still a long war to be waged there," he told ABC.
Mr Khosa said the death of bin Laden did have an enormous symbolic impact in removing a source of insurgent inspiration
MAY 2nd 2011
So because it was hit in 1993, they should have been prepared for the planes hitting the WTC in 2001? I think not - still happened out of the blue.No it didn't, the WTC was hit in '93 and OBL was in the cross hairs long before then
AQI were hitting plenty of people and countries at that time, including their own countrymen in Iraq. Intelligence agencies may have been expecting an attack in Spain, to the people though it happened out of the blue.No it didn't - AQI targetted the Spanish intelligence set up in Iraq just before then and both AQ and AQI warned of attacks intended to alter the 2004 Spanish election results
There is no official documentation warning of impending attack in London, purely speculation and some of that specualtion was mere minutes before the bombs went off - once again out of the blue to most of the population.Again, no it didn't. There were commercial reports circulating warning of an attack in London that month. One major bank practised a complete evacuation of its global HQ the day before.
Bali was hit in 2002 and 2005, and trust me as an Australian who had friends in Bali, it ****ing well came out of the blue. No warnings, either local or international against travelling to Bali.Again, no it didn't. Hotels had already been hit in Indonesia - and of course Bali was hit twice.
My point was that to the general public all of these attacks came out of the blue. I don't know anyone who sat watching 9/11 who thought "I knew this would happen" - WORLDWIDE SHOCK was the general consensus
Last edited by Toddy1; 05-04-2011 at 09:25 PM. Reason: Childish and irrelevant name calling - thanks CJ for pointing this out
Toddy, does not surprise me, locals are mostly KIA. Heck if I was from the back waters, errr mountains of A-Stan, who knows where I would be. The brains of any organization is always safe in some bunker.
Referenced for Royal, who seems determined to disagree with me whenever he can. Sometimes you just have to point out the obvious.
Hope this wasn't posted.
Hahahahahahah
Priceless!
Winning.
Posting Permissions
