Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 100

Thread: USN Free Electron Laser and Railgun - Cancelled.

  1. #1
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,189

    Default USN Free Electron Laser and Railgun - Cancelled.

    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...laser-railgun/

    "The Senate just drove a stake into the Navy’s high-tech heart. The directed energy and electromagnetic weapons intended to protect the surface ships of the future? Terminated.
    The Free Electron Laser and the Electromagnetic Railgun are experimental weapons that the Navy hope will one day burn missiles careening toward their ships out of the sky and fire bullets at hypersonic speeds at targets thousands of miles away. Neither will be ready until at least the 2020s, the Navy estimates. But the Senate Armed Services Committee has a better delivery date in mind: never."

    Yeah, zero the money. That'll certainly increase the odds of perfecting them.

  2. #2
    WTF am I doing with my life? Token White Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    'Bama
    Age
    22
    Posts
    10,090

    Default

    WTF are they thinking?! This technology is the future of our Navy. Get these incompetent old farts out of office!
    Last edited by Token White Guy; 06-18-2011 at 12:03 PM.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    11

    Default

    Surprise, surprise. Even superpower cant't get everything, at once. It's not like that all research in that field will stop. Probably there is low probability for technological breakthough right now even with proper financing.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Halidon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,335

    Default

    Fairly good odds this funding will be restored in the House, and possibly it could return before the budget leaves the Senate.

    Nice picture of the blitzer.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Soldat_Américain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Protecting the Gold Vault
    Age
    24
    Posts
    12,827

    Default

    Sweet...we're fvcked.

  6. #6
    **** you 20122. how goes does gaz type drunk? dricl. man Hellfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    A terra dos foguetes
    Posts
    29,397

    Default

    You guys are whiny bitches.

  7. #7
    Senior Member bababooey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Hell, but the nice part of hell
    Posts
    1,386

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellfish View Post
    You guys are whiny bitches.
    x2...................

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Bourgogne/ France
    Posts
    103

    Default

    Maybe if they cancelled them it's because they've got something else... better... ?

  9. #9
    Senior Member deathil93's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Zionist Empire
    Posts
    1,885

    Default

    Simple logic, throw money at it and than cancel it...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fb74 View Post
    Maybe if they cancelled them it's because they've got something else... better... ?
    They don't, unless they got the tech from the Iranian plasma stealth thrust vectoring space submarine.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Soldat_Américain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Protecting the Gold Vault
    Age
    24
    Posts
    12,827

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellfish View Post
    You guys are whiny bitches.
    But I like big guns more than missiles...

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,147

    Default

    But I like big guns more than missiles...
    Unfortunately our preferences don't make economic sense, as much as I like seeing development in these particular areas and think that the navy will be at the forefront of actually deploying these I do think it makes sense to put this on hold until there's a more critical need for such weaponry or the budget gets into better shape.

    Simple logic, throw money at it and than cancel it...
    Most of the work seems to be working out the basic technical issues with these types of weapons and improving efficiency, cancelling it now, even if they never return to a project with the specific requirements this one had will still leave a lot of engineering solutions that can be used for other laser/railgun projects in the future.

  12. #12
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Brazil
    Age
    25
    Posts
    2,260

    Default

    Fvcking bastards, probably the same morons who are eager to cancel the F-35 program.

    Quote Originally Posted by Amur_Tiger View Post
    Unfortunately our preferences don't make economic sense, as much as I like seeing development in these particular areas and think that the navy will be at the forefront of actually deploying these I do think it makes sense to put this on hold until there's a more critical need for such weaponry or the budget gets into better shape.
    That sort of thinking is what got us bankrupt in pretty much every major war we fought, while we were still a monarchy.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,147

    Default

    That sort of thinking is what got us bankrupt in pretty much every major war we fought, while we were still a monarchy.
    Ok? Good for.. Brazil? This is the US we're talking about here who spends roughly the same amount as the rest of the world combined, the specific weaponry in question is decades away from being put on a ship and in both cases would be replacing existing systems that nobody seems to be complaining about the performance of.

  14. #14
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Brazil
    Age
    25
    Posts
    2,260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amur_Tiger View Post
    Ok? Good for.. Brazil? This is the US we're talking about here who spends roughly the same amount as the rest of the world combined, the specific weaponry in question is decades away from being put on a ship and in both cases would be replacing existing systems that nobody seems to be complaining about the performance of.
    My point here is that it's a huge mistake not to plan ahead considering future scenarios.

  15. #15
    How's that Hopey Changey thing workin'? C.Puffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goddamnit avatar GROWWWW!
    Posts
    16,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hellfish View Post
    You guys are whiny bitches.
    Yeah, let's wait until we need them to develop them. I'm sure it will be as easy as picking an apple from the tree. Nevermind that we've been trying to get them to work since the 80's. I'm sure we'll figure it out just in time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •