Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 158

Thread: Palestine wins vote for UNESCO membership

  1. #76
    Senior Member armored_diplomacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    At the gym, lifting non impressive weights
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Camera View Post
    The punitive measures are because the Palestinians violated the previously signed accords through their unilateral bids for recogntion of an independent Palestinian state, by the UNSC and UNESCO. These bids violate the agreements signed with Israel and sponsored by the US, according to which the final should be determined through a negotiated accord.
    I didn´t know that, thanks for the info.

  2. #77
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by armored_diplomacy View Post
    I didn´t know that, thanks for the info.
    That is also one of the main reasons the US is opposing so firmly to all these unilateral Palestinian steps. The US was a sponsor to all the agreements since the Oslo Accords, signed in the White House, and Abbas is fooling now the US just as he is fooling Israel.

  3. #78
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Camera View Post
    The punitive measures are because the Palestinians violated the previously signed accords through their unilateral bids for recogntion of an independent Palestinian state, by the UNSC and UNESCO. These bids violate the agreements signed with Israel and sponsored by the US, according to which the final status should be determined ONLY through a negotiated agreement and not through unilateral steps.
    But you don't have to be an independent state to be accepted as a UNESCO member, so how does that membership violates the previous agreements? Did those specifically forbid the PA from seeking non-independent state recognition as well?

  4. #79
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend View Post
    But you don't have to be an independent state to be accepted as a UNESCO member, so how does that membership violates the previous agreements? Did those specifically forbid the PA from seeking non-independent state recognition as well?
    The bid to the UNSC was already a violation of the agreements, because it seeks a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, while bypassing negotiations. Israel threatened to take punitive measures for that reason, but finally refrained from doing so, because the bid won't pass and also because it wants to facilitate the negotiations the Quarter is promoting.
    But now, Israeli officials say they are going to take punitive measures for the bid to UNESCO. I'm not sure this bid also violated the bilateral agreements, but it could be. I'll check out and I'll answer you.

  5. #80
    The member that no one remembers. IconOfEvi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The United American Empire
    Posts
    12,581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Camera View Post
    US cuts off $60M UNESCO funding over Palestinian vote


    Washington follows through on threat to halt financial support to UN's Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization if it grants PA full-member status. UN Chief Ban warns of further fiscal ramifications


    Yitzhak Benhorin

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...142143,00.html


    Wow, to be honest, I didn't think they would actually do it!

    Legitimately impressed

  6. #81
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    The UNSC bid, absolutely, that is ground enough to warrant retaliatory measures as per the aforementioned agreements.

  7. #82
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend View Post
    The UNSC bid, absolutely, that is ground enough to warrant retaliatory measures as per the aforementioned agreements.
    I remember I read some two weeks ago that the bid to become a full member to UNESCO, which is a UN body violates, violates Oslo agreements. I don't remember where I read it, so I can not find the link right now.
    I believe more information will be available on the news sites in the days to come.

    I found this statement made by Nethanyau and quoted by msn news:

    Israel angry, Palestinians triumphant over UNESCO vote


    Israel on Monday lashed out after UNESCO voted to grant 'Palestine' full membership, in a move which was hailed by Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas as a "victory" for his people's rights.


    (…)

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Palestinian bid to win membership at the United Nations as well as in other UN bodies was an attempt to secure a state without a peace deal, in what he described as a "crude violation" of the commitment to resolve the conflict through negotiations.


    http://news.ph.msn.com/top-stories/a...mentid=5473220

  8. #83
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    It's odd that Israel didn't seek retaliation after the UNSC bid, come to think of it, even if the bid was aborted. Maybe "no sanctions" was part of the diplomatic ballet that had Abbas put the bid on hold.

  9. #84
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend View Post
    It's odd that Israel didn't seek retaliation after the UNSC bid, come to think of it, even if the bid was aborted. Maybe "no sanctions" was part of the diplomatic ballet that had Abbas put the bid on hold.

    I guess you are right.
    Obama, who stated he will veto the bid, asked Israel not to sanction Abbas in order to facilitate the initiative of the Quarter to restart talks.

  10. #85
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    Now the UNESCO "punition" makes a lot more sense indeed. It may not be strictly against past agreements per se, but it follows another bid which clearly was, so this time there's no freebie. Thanks!

  11. #86
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    53
    Posts
    10,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend View Post
    Now the UNESCO "punition" makes a lot more sense indeed. It may not be strictly against past agreements per se, but it follows another bid which clearly was, so this time there's no freebie. Thanks!
    And BTW, the Quartet didn't manage to make the Palestinians go back to talks.



    Here's what the pupils learn in PA's schools funded by the EU:


    NGO: PA doesn’t meet UNESCO statehood guidelines


    By KHALED ABU TOAMEH
    11/01/2011 01:26

    IMPACT-SE report uncovers continued demonization of Israel and Jews in Palestinian textbooks.

    (…)

    IMPACT-SE is a research organization that monitors and analyzes schoolbooks and curricula across the Middle East with an eye toward determining their compliance with international standards on peace and tolerance, a goal derived directly from UNESCO declarations and resolutions.

    “The monitoring of the Palestinian schoolbooks in use for the school year 2011 shows that the fundamentals against Israel and the Jews are upheld,” the study concluded.

    It said that the fundamentals included negating both Israel and the Jews.

    (…)

    “The Oslo accords and the Declaration of Principles are mentioned and even quoted, but they are not praised and a peacefully negotiated settlement is not advocated or supported,” said the authors of the study.

    “In contrast, there is a lot of praise for jihad and martyrdom to free Palestine without defining clearly the territory to be liberated, hence implying that Israel’s territory is also to be liberated.”

    The study quotes the following paragraph from a Grade 8 book: “Today the Muslim countries need urgently jihad and jihad fighters in order to liberate the robbed lands and to get rid of the robbing Jews from the robbed lands in Palestine and in the Levant.”

    http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPol...aspx?id=243916
    Last edited by Camera; 10-31-2011 at 10:18 PM.

  12. #87
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    Splendid, we'll get another generation of brainwashed...

  13. #88
    Member Piano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Age
    25
    Posts
    748

    Default

    America should just withdraw all its (massive) funding for the UN and spend the money domestically and on something worthwhile.

  14. #89
    Senior Member Atlantic Friend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Politically Dubious Uncle Cracka
    Age
    43
    Posts
    12,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piano View Post
    America should just withdraw all its (massive) funding for the UN and spend the money domestically and on something worthwhile.
    Won't ever happen.

  15. #90
    Member Piano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Age
    25
    Posts
    748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atlantic Friend View Post
    Won't ever happen.
    Why not? They could both save billions over the years, and reduce the power of the UN (which is mainly an anti-Western instrument).

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •