
Originally Posted by
kalerab
Frankly, term "political legitimacy to rule" is just political bs. Vast majority of governments of this world were not elected freely or were not elected at all and have their power not from (although it is cliche) will of the people, but from the force with which they operate. During socialism, in out textbook definition of state was "controlled violence". Also as everyone can notice, this term comes to play not while defending someone legitimacy to rule, but when states are attacking someone legitimacy. That is why you will never, ever hear from any state in the world anything about legitimacy of CCP in China for example. Anyway that doesnt mean that Assads government have this legitimacy, but if someone operates with that term using it in context that he lost his legitimacy year ago, when he himself is unelected dictator for decade, is laughtable.