Do I smell war.
I guess even such threat can put oil price up, hurting our strained economies. And aren't they nowadays better stacked with land-based ssm's? But indeed, if they try it, it's a suicide for them...
Wait, do they launch only a maneuver to simulate a closing of the Hormuz strait or do they plan to actually close the straight for real? Even Lolmadinichad can't be that stupid (but you can never be sure with those damn politicians)
Ahhh... YESSSS, just in time. With Iraq returning to normalcy (AFU), and Afghanistan reduced the status of don't-knock-it-it's-the-only-war-we-got, a nasty outbreak of world peace (more or less) was on the horizon. Just in time, another lunatic fringe country volunteers for de-building before re-building.
Lets see ... Iran, N. Korea, Pakistan, maybe Cuba and Venezuala, and ... hummmmm and .... well ... I'm out of candidates. Oh well, something will turn up.
Last edited by Jacknola; 12-13-2011 at 09:59 AM.
So, Iranian navy cant block the straight for more than 15 minutes, the only way for them to block the straight is for the Iranian navy to sink ships and saturate the waters with mines.. So, then they can block it for more than 15 minutes or they still cannot? You confused me greatly
I think the point being made was that the Iranian forces haven't the power to conduct a conventional naval blockade, at least not if it is opposed. So physical blocking of the channels in concert with mines and whatever naval/air action they could muster would be their only means of "blocking" the Strait.
This doesn't allow for them to permit safe passage to 'allies' while denying to 'enemies', although they could probably ease things somewhat for the former.
It's a reasonable point although the "15 minute" angle was a bit hyperbolic.
In any event, the very attempt is likely to lead to a wider war in extremely short order.
The IRN and the IRGCN have a variety of means to affect shipping in the Gulf region. The notable ones are:
- 3 Kilo - class submarines
- Surface vessels of the IRN
- FAC's armed with AShM's
- Shore-launched AShM's
- Naval mines dispersed by the IRN and the small vessels of the IRGCN
- FAC's armed with MLRS
- Boarding raids by the IRGCN
- Aircraft of the IRIAF
- Coastal artillery
- Midget submarines
While the large surface vessels and the submarines aren't that big of a deal for the United States to handle, hundreds of FAC's and other armed small boats, anti-ship missiles, naval mines and numerous small submarines are a lot harder to wipe out entirely. It's a long stretch of coast with a many islands. It's not like they'd have to destroy every vessel moving trough. Just the threat to the shipping, not to mention damaging or sinking a few tankers would sky-rocket the insurance costs.
As mentioned, it would simultaneously strip Iran from it's own primary means of foreign trade, so starting a shooting war by "closing" the strait is very unlikely to be done by Tehran.
If it was easy, there'd be no more pirating in Somalia either, and look at what the Somali's got. A bunch of fishing boats and douchebags with AK's and RPG's.
Worked so well for Iran last time, didnt it? Operation Praying Mantis II coming to an IRGC zodiac soon
I was also thinking of Operation Praying Mantis anyone seen the the video on youtube from that day of the American ship announcing to the Iranian ships on the loud speaker from the US ship "This is a warning ceasefire abandon your ship at once we intend to sink you"