Page 1 of 8 12345678 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 117

Thread: Iran offers "new initiatives" for talks

  1. #1
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default Iran offers "new initiatives" for talks

    http://news.yahoo.com/iran-offers-in...120236568.html

    VIENNA (*******) - Iran, facing sanctions that could cripple its oil exports, has told world powers it wants to resume long-stalled talks with "new initiatives," and France said it might be open to addressing suspicions about its nuclear program.
    Tehran made the offer in a letter to the EU's foreign policy chief obtained by ******* Thursday, a day after it trumpeted several advances in nuclear know-how and sent oil prices upward.
    Iran's president vowed no retreat from its nuclear program Wednesday but state television announced the proposal to re-launch talks after a year's hiatus.
    Iranian chief negotiator Saeed Jalili's letter said he would have "new initiatives" but did not spell them out. He made one reference to "Iran's nuclear issue," without spelling out whether Tehran was prepared to negotiate on it.
    French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said that while the letter was "ambiguous" it seemed to signal "the start of opening up from Iran" with respect to discussing its nuclear activity.
    A February 20-21 visit to Iran by top U.N. nuclear watchdog officials would help determine whether Tehran was serious about tackling international concerns, Juppe told reporters.
    The U.N. team, led by the International Atomic Energy Agency's chief inspector, will again try to extract Iranian explanations, after three years of stonewalling, for an IAEA investigation driven by intelligence reports that suggest Tehran has researched sophisticated ways to build atomic bombs.
    Jalili's letter was a reply to one from Ashton in October in which she said the big powers could meet with Iran within weeks if it was ready to "engage seriously in meaningful discussions."
    Jalili said he welcomed an earlier statement by Ashton on respecting Iran's right to the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
    "(A) constructive and positive attitude toward the Islamic Republic of Iran's new initiatives in this round of talks could open positive perspective for our negotiation," Jalili said in the brief English-language letter.
    "Therefore...I propose to resume our talks in order to take fundamental steps for sustainable cooperation in the earliest possibility in a mutually agreed venue and time."
    Jalili urged a focus "on a spectrum of various issues" to lay groundwork for "constructive, forward-looking cooperation."
    BUYING TIME?
    Western officials said the powers were consulting on a response to Jalili's letter.
    A British government source struck a cautiously positive note: "The key issue last time was (Iranian) pre-conditions, and pre-conditions are not mentioned in (this) letter."
    The White House said it was reviewing the letter and repeated there was "time and space" for diplomacy to resolve tensions between Tehran and the West.
    The United States and its allies suspect Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons capability under cover of a declared civilian nuclear energy program, and believe Tehran has used talks only as a time-buying tool, not a pathway to agreement.
    Iran says it is enriching uranium only for civilian purposes. But after the IAEA report in November, the United States and EU adopted sanctions meant to shut down Iran's oil export industry, the world's fifth largest.
    The clampdown on Iranian oil would take full effect in July.
    Ashton handles the Iran file on behalf of six world powers - the United States, Russia, China, Germany, France and Britain.
    Negotiations have been frozen since a fruitless meeting in Istanbul in January 2011.
    Iran's ambassador to Moscow, Seyed Mahmoud Reza Sajjadi, told a news conference that Tehran would accept "no preliminary conditions" for progress in any further talks.
    He was responding to a question about a Russian suggestion that, as a first step toward a resolution of the standoff, Iran could take measures including freezing the number of its centrifuges for uranium enrichment at current levels in return for assurances it would face no additional sanctions.
    Sajjadi also shrugged off Iran's shrinking oil trade, saying Iran would benefit from any ban on its crude exports by boosting domestic production of refined fuels.
    "Iranians will show the whole world how they can use an embargo as an opportunity," he said.
    Iran proclaimed three nuclear achievements Wednesday - a "new generation" of centrifuge able to refine uranium three times faster than at present, a major increase in the number of centrifuges, and loading a research reactor with Iran's first batch of domestically produced fuel.
    If Iran succeeded in introducing modern centrifuges for production, it could significantly shorten the time needed to stockpile enriched uranium, which can generate electricity or, if refined much more, produce nuclear explosions.
    Western diplomats and analysts said the Iranian announcements were largely hype and bluff, noting that Iran had been trying to develop several newer versions of centrifuges for years without introducing them into production.
    SHADOW WAR
    Israel accused Iran of being behind attacks on Israeli targets in India, Thailand and Georgia this week. Security experts said they appeared to be retaliation for a campaign of sabotage waged against Iran's nuclear program.
    At least four Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed in recent years in attacks believed carried out by or for Israel's intelligence services. Some analysts also suspect it has been involved in explosions at military and nuclear facilities.
    Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, said Thursday U.S. agencies believed Israel had not yet taken a decision to launch a full-scale military strike on Iranian nuclear sites.
    Iran was expected to respond if attacked but was thought unlikely to start any military conflict, he said.
    Iran's Oil Ministry denied a state media report that it had cut off oil exports to six EU states, while leaving open the option as a pre-emptive strike against an EU plan to launch an embargo on Iranian oil on July 1.
    Whether erroneous or just premature, the report caused a spike in oil prices to their highest level since August.
    Iran is the world's No. 5 oil exporter, with 2.6 million barrels going abroad daily, about a fifth of it to EU countries.
    Western sanctions are spreading to block Iran's oil exports and central bank financing of trade, and Tehran has resorted to barter and other unorthodox ways to import staples like rice, cooking oil and tea, commodities traders say.
    Iran bought almost half a million tones of wheat this week, they said Thursday, with private buyers in talks to import from Russia using roubles as payment.
    The Obama administration is also pressing the European Union and SWIFT, the global organization that facilitates most of the world's cross-border payments, to expel Iranian banks from its network, a new step in the push to deprive Iran of funds, a U.S. official said Wednesday.
    (Additional reporting by Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Dmitry Zhdannikov and Adrian Croft in London and Rachelle Younglai and Roberta Rampton in Washington; Writing by Mark Heinrich; Editing by Andrew Roche)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Leaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,671

    Default

    Very good news. I welcome this

  3. #3
    On Belay... Climb on Climber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buenos Aires in body, the beautiful and green Sharon in my heart
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leaper View Post
    Very good news. I welcome this
    Do you welcome a smoke screen?

  4. #4

    Default

    Isn't that what the sanctions for? force them to get back to talk and negotiate?

  5. #5
    Μολὼν λαβέ Hollis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Stuck in the rain and mud again.
    Posts
    22,948

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Climber View Post
    Do you welcome a smoke screen?
    That could be. Like Leaper this does seems to be good news if it is not a ploy.

  6. #6
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Age
    47
    Posts
    24,841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Climber View Post
    Do you welcome a smoke screen?
    "It is better to jaw-jaw than to war-war"
    -Winston Churchill

    Keep in mind that Israel always kept a communications channel with the PLO during the 70's / 80's.

  7. #7
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Age
    47
    Posts
    24,841

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icefrog View Post
    Isn't that what the sanctions for? force them to get back to talk and negotiate?
    Doesn't work all the time.
    Ask Fidel Castro.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    ...I think it’s quite clear that they haven’t decided to build the bomb only to create the adequate infrastructure. This in order to give their politicians some leverage in future negotiations thus enhancing the will to “level the playing field” as one would say.
    I think and hope that this all could take a quite positive turn in the end for the whole region.
    This is what I wrote in this thread

    No Good Military Option For Iran
    http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums...t=#post6008026

    I think this could be the natural evolution of this situation. I feel like saying "c’mon already get it over with"
    I also doubt that the sanctions were the driving force behind the Iranian decision.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Leaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,671

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Climber View Post
    Do you welcome a smoke screen?
    I know where you come from but please, at least try to be Optimistic one time in your life

  10. #10
    Platinum Member Rattfink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In a knife fight with a gypsy...
    Posts
    13,444

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ordie View Post
    Doesn't work all the time.
    Ask Fidel Castro.
    Who enforced sanctions against Cuba? America? The sanctions on Iran are more comprehensive.

  11. #11
    Senior Member JGXL836's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Israel, Sderot
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,895

    Default

    Another Persian smoke screen to get more time.

  12. #12
    Banned user
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Age
    47
    Posts
    24,841

    Default

    The Persians invented the game Poker.
    It's a question of folding or placing bets.

  13. #13
    On Belay... Climb on Climber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Buenos Aires in body, the beautiful and green Sharon in my heart
    Age
    46
    Posts
    11,021

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icefrog View Post
    Isn't that what the sanctions for? force them to get back to talk and negotiate?
    They should open all their facilities to IAEA if they were any serious

    Quote Originally Posted by Hollis View Post
    That could be. Like Leaper this does seems to be good news if it is not a ploy.
    They are buying time

    Quote Originally Posted by Ordie View Post
    "It is better to jaw-jaw than to war-war"
    -Winston Churchill

    Keep in mind that Israel always kept a communications channel with the PLO during the 70's / 80's.
    What Chamberlain did?

    Quote Originally Posted by Leaper View Post
    I know where you come from but please, at least try to be Optimistic one time in your life
    Lol, I am not a little bit about them, less after this week bombings.

    Quote Originally Posted by JGXL836 View Post
    Another Persian smoke screen to get more time.
    This.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,896

    Default

    sanctions are to make them pay a huge price for their nuclear bomb. I won't stop them, but it may slow them down.

    Now they are putting up a smoke screen.

    No negotiations. Just hurt them ecomonically, politically.

    You play as a down lineman, you don't 'negotiate' with the other guy. You push him, block him, call his sister names and back him up.

    ...then when you're getting up after the play, you poke him in the eye. There's no negotiating....

  15. #15
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    ^^ it is not as that easy as you portrayed. There are elements within the government that want to reduce tensions with the west,US. If they those elements are behind the calls for negotiations then we are on the right track.

    IMO, this nuclear issue can be solved within 4,5 days of intense discussions. But they must be honest and based on mutual respect

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •