Other options the Army is considering include the German Puma infantry fighting vehicle. The Army wanted to bring the Puma to White Sands Missile Range this spring, but it did not work out in time, DiMarco said.
Or you want to reduce number of dismount in every Namer,in case crew not trained as infantry?So to increase number of vehicles etc.Or what?And if you want to do this,where from do you get this ppl,why don't you want to give them tank instead of Namer.
You know there are some things you can't buy even if you have money,simply not worth it.And i even didn't started about logistic and operational stuff.Do tankers really want turret on Namer?Infantry they want.
In the end yes it will be nice heaving turret at least on some of Namer in service,it's always nice heaving something vs not heaving,but is it worth allocating any money at all?
In any case, I'm definately looking forward to seeing whatever final design the next US IFV will be.
Lets check out their small arms while we're at it.
Besides looking amazing, does anyone have any opinions on the AK5?
^ wtf? [*******#ffffff]...........[/color]