Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Former Iran negotiator says nuclear deal possible, talks set for 13 april

  1. #1
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default Former Iran negotiator says nuclear deal possible, talks set for 13 april

    [*******#000000][FONT=arial]

    • [FONT=Georgia] [/FONT][FONT=Georgia]UNITED NATIONS (*******) - An end to a nearly decade-longnuclear standoff between Iran and major world powers will be possible if the United States and its European allies recognize Tehran's right to enrich uranium, a former Iranian negotiator said in an editorial.[/FONT]
    [/FONT][/COLOR][*******#000000][FONT=arial][FONT=Georgia]"Talks between Iran and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany (P5+1), scheduled for next month, provide the best opportunity to break the nine-year deadlock over Iran's nuclear program," Hossein Mousavian, Iran's former chief nuclear negotiator, wrote in an editorial in the Boston Globe.
    Mousavian, now a visiting scholar at Princeton University in New Jersey, had been seen as a moderate when in the Iranian government. Although he is not currently a policymaker, such public presentations of Iranian thinking is rare.
    Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful and rejects U.S. and European allegations that it is secretly amassing the capability to produce atomic weapons. Iran has rejected Security Council demands that it halt enrichment and other sensitive nuclear work, saying it has a sovereign right to atomic energy.
    This has led to four rounds of increasingly stringent U.N. Security Council sanctions, mostly focusing on its nuclear and missile industries, but also targeting some financial institutions, a few subsidiaries of its major shipping firm, and companies linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
    In recent months there has been increased speculation about possible Israeli air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites - which some analysts fear could spark a Middle East war.
    For the talks, expected to take place in mid-April, to open the door to a resolution of the standoff with Iran, Mousavian said the United States and its European allies must make clear that war and coercion are not the only options.
    They should seek enhanced engagement with Tehran, as U.S. President Barack Obama has repeatedly called for.
    "This could work - since 2003, Iran has been looking for a viable and durable solution to the diplomatic standoff," wrote Mousavian.
    POLITICALLY MOTIVATED CHARGES
    Mousavian was Iran's chief nuclear negotiator from 2003 to 2005 before conservative President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took over from his reformist predecessor Mohammad Khatami. According to Western envoys familiar with Mousavian, he appeared at the time to be genuinely interested in reaching a deal with the West.
    After he was removed from the nuclear negotiating team, Mousavian was arrested and briefly jailed in 2007 on accusations of espionage. He was acquitted of that charge, which could have carried the death penalty, but was found guilty of "propaganda against the system."
    Analysts and diplomats said the charges against Mousavian were really a reflection of an internal Iranian dispute over how to handle Iran's atomic dispute with the West. Some Iranians favor the moderate line adopted by Mousavian while others have backed Ahmadinejad's more confrontational approach.
    Mousavian writes that if a deal that is acceptable to both parties is to be reached, the two sides' "bottom lines" should be identified.
    "For Iran, this is the recognition of its legitimate right to create a nuclear program - including enrichment - and a backing off by the P5+1 from its zero-enrichment position."
    "For the P5+1, it is an absolute prohibition on Iran from creating a nuclear bomb, and having Iran clear up ambiguities in its nuclear program to the satisfaction of the International Atomic Energy Agency," Mousavian writes.
    The West also needs to abandon calls for regime change and accept that "crippling sanctions, covert actions, and military strikes might slow down Iran's nuclear program but will not stop it."
    "In fact, it is too late to demand that Iran suspend enrichment activities," Mousavian writes. "It mastered enrichment technology and reached break-out capability in 2002 and continues to steadily improve its uranium-enrichment capabilities."
    The so-called "break-out" capability refers to the ability of a country to construct a nuclear weapon.
    A U.S. think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), has said that capping Iranian uranium enrichment at 5 percent purity level compared with the 90 percent needed for a bomb could form part of an interim deal that would give time for more substantial negotiations.
    This and other priority measures would "limit Iran's capability to break out quickly," ISIS said in a report.
    Among the things the West should offer to Iran is a package that includes recognition of its nuclear rights, ending sanctions, and "normalization of Iran's nuclear file." In return, Iran should offer the IAEA full transparency and permit the most intrusive inspections possible.
    [/FONT]

    [/FONT][/COLOR]
    Last edited by IRN34; 03-31-2012 at 05:35 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    There are signs that shows the possibility of a deal in the next two weeks

  3. #3
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    55
    Posts
    14,720

    Default

    The scheduled discussions will last 2 days, maybe to short to make dill. If a breakthrough is achieved in these talks it will be great.

  4. #4
    Senior Member G-AWZT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Age
    46
    Posts
    7,009

    Default

    They're just buying time, stalling nothing more.

  5. #5
    Weapons Expert! I play video games ragnarok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Michigan Northwoods
    Posts
    1,004

    Default

    From everything that has been going on, It appears that the sanctions are working and its making things harder for Tehran to make do with. Its only a matter of time until the economy falls into a downward spiral, so it would be to Tehran's interests to make clear of what it's nuclear program for what its supose to be is to the world. The biggest players in these talks for sure will be Iran, the US, and Russia and each of them will have something to add to the table on these talks.

  6. #6
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by G-AWZT View Post
    They're just buying time, stalling nothing more.
    Do you call 9 years 'buying time'? Talk about 'buying time' when Iran is planning to achieve something very big in a couple of months but Iran has already everything they want: nuclear power plant, centrifuges and uranium.

    From everything that has been going on, It appears that the sanctions are working and its making things harder for Tehran to make do with. Its only a matter of time until the economy falls into a downward spiral, so it would be to Tehran's interests to make clear of what it's nuclear program for what its supose to be is to the world. The biggest players in these talks for sure will be Iran, the US, and Russia and each of them will have something to add to the table on these talks.
    Iran is not the only country with economic problems, Europe and US are suffering too. Iran stopped exporting oil to UK, look what happened to the UK. This is a sanction applied by Iran to punish UK, and it has effects.

  7. #7
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    ^^ well, the supreme leader says ''it is against islam to produce weapons'' so i dnt know how on earth he will order production of the bombs when he announces such thing

  8. #8
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    55
    Posts
    14,720

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IRN34 View Post
    ^^ well, the supreme leader says ''it is against islam to produce weapons'' so i dnt know how on earth he will order production of the bombs when he announces such thing
    If all the Supreme leader wanted were medicines for cancer, why he would bather with such huge investments and so many troubles?

  9. #9
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Camera View Post
    If all the Supreme leader wanted were medicines for cancer, why he would bather with such huge investments and so many troubles?
    Because the nuclear dossier has become a new tool for ''resistance''

  10. #10
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    [SIZE=3]Iran prefers Iraq as venue for talks with P5+1[/SIZE]


    EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton (L) and Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Saeed Jalili during talks in Geneva, Switzerland, December 6, 2010
    Wed Apr 4, 2012 3:14PM GMT

    Iran has reportedly asked Iraq to serve as the venue for the new round of nuclear energy talks between Tehran and the P5+1 -- the US, the UK, France, Russia, China, and Germany

  11. #11
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    55
    Posts
    14,720

    Default

    Barak reveals conditions for Iran-West talks

    [*******#8F8F8F][*******#8F8F8F]By YAAKOV KATZ[/COLOR][/COLOR]
    [*******#8F8F8F]04/04/2012 20:04[/COLOR]

    Defense minister says strike not within weeks but can also not wait years, demands Iran surrender 20 percent-enriched uranium, close underground Fordow facility.



    (…)

    Barak revealed what Israel's conditions are for the talks:

    1) transfer of all uranium enriched to 20 percent - approximately 120 kilograms – out of Iran to a third party country; 2) the transfer of the majority of the 5 tons of uranium enriched to 3.5 percent out of Iran, leaving just enough needed for energy purposes; 3) the closure of the Fordow enrichment facility, buried under a mountain near the city of Qom; 4) the transfer of fuel rods from a third party country to Iran for the purpose of activating the Tehran Research Reactor.

    As reported Wednesday in The Jerusalem Post, assessments in the defense establishment are that a confrontation with Iran may be postponed until sometime in 2013. This is the result of the sanctions which have been imposed on Iran and are believed to be effective.

    Barak said Wednesday that there was still time before a strike would be required. “It is not needed within weeks but it is also not something that can wait a number of years,” he said in rare comments to military reporters.



    http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/N...aspx?id=264839

  12. #12
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    551

    Default

    ^^ Israel is not in the talks. So for who are these ''conditions'' ?

  13. #13
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Not Iraq
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Why not, Iraq is more neutral ground to hold the talks on.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    France
    Age
    55
    Posts
    14,720

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IRN34 View Post
    ^^ Israel is not in the talks. So for who are these ''conditions'' ?
    Israel transmitted to the P5+1 what conditions are acceptable for her.

  15. #15
    Suspended for infractions
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Israel, Sderot
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,878

    Default

    Defense Minister Ehud Barak declared Wednesday that 2012 is "the year of the fight against the Iranian nuclear program."
    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...212691,00.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •