Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 91

Thread: J20 speculation/discussion (read rules first or die)

  1. #1
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,544

    Default J20 speculation/discussion (read rules first or die)

    Hello everyone,

    Let's have a *civil* discussion about the J20. What you think it might be used for, interesting tid bits about it, etc etc. All kinds of discussion.

    Rules:

    1. Keep it civil.

    2. Don't be a rooster.

    3. Dispassionate discussion only please. I don't want to see people getting their nationalism on thanks.

    4. Related to 3. Discuss it civilly and back up your opinion. If you start posting rubbish like "you're wrong!" but don't provide any discussion to back it up I'll ask the mods to delete your post.

    5. Only use comparisons to other aircraft to highlight role/capability/doctrine differences, not to assert that is is better or worse than anything else.


    It's an interesting aircraft and we don't know much about it. I've been having a thought lately it might be designed as some kind of high speed LO missile carrier to strike things like AWACS and other high value targets. Thoughts?
    Last edited by Zorro C9; 04-07-2012 at 11:54 PM. Reason: Added a rule.

  2. #2
    Senior Member armored_diplomacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    At the gym, lifting non impressive weights
    Posts
    6,337

    Default

    This may be useful



    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

  3. #3
    Senior Member Chiptox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    East Farms, PNW
    Age
    31
    Posts
    2,763

    Default

    I'm very interested in this as I know little about this aircraft. Every thread I've looked in on has turned into a ****-waving contest that is high on emotion and low on information.

    I think a general rule that would be helpful for this thread would be to only use comparisons to other aircraft to highlight role/capability/doctrine differences, not to assert that is is better or worse than anything else.

  4. #4
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    That's a good rule, Chiptox, I'll add it in.

  5. #5
    Senior Member armored_diplomacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    At the gym, lifting non impressive weights
    Posts
    6,337

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiptox View Post
    I'm very interested in this as I know little about this aircraft. Every thread I've looked in on has turned into a ****-waving contest that is high on emotion and low on information.

    I think a general rule that would be helpful for this thread would be to only use comparisons to other aircraft to highlight role/capability/doctrine differences, not to assert that is is better or worse than anything else.
    X 2
    (actually that was the purpose of my picture)

    Well, here goes my guess (remember I´m aviation challenged also)

    Had China wanted to had its own "5th generation", why not going for a more "conventional" design? (yes, I mean: something like the F-22)
    Raptors have being around for years, and I´m pretty sure they know more than one secret about it. Trying a new approach will take years of tests; meanwhile F-22s are in service and t-50s are all steam (plus years of Russian know how)

  6. #6
    the Ralph Wiggum of Mp.net. timetraveller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    7,309

    Default

    How long has that been in the test flying stages ? If China intends to offer her on the market she would have to do the Airshow circuit to giving a proper visual representation that would make potential buyers sway there decision and I suspect her first public appreance outside China may well be the Moscow Airshow . Is there any further info on her regarding max ceiling , fuel , range and is it inflight refuel capable as well ??

  7. #7
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by armored_diplomacy View Post
    X 2
    (actually that was the purpose of my picture)

    Well, here goes my guess (remember I´m aviation challenged also)

    Had China wanted to had its own "5th generation", why not going for a more "conventional" design? (yes, I mean: something like the F-22)
    Raptors have being around for years, and I´m pretty sure they know more than one secret about it. Trying a new approach will take years of tests; meanwhile F-22s are in service and t-50s are all steam (plus years of Russian know how)
    The design is one reason why I'm wondering aloud about it being designed for high speed. Long and thin has traditionally usually been a design attribute of high speed aircraft (ref SR71, F-104 for two).

    Quote Originally Posted by Godfather057 View Post
    When I first look at the engines, it appeared that the nozzle for the exhaust pipes are not covered and may provide an area that is visible to radar and that doesn't shield the heat signature.


    Unless the nozzel is covered in RAM and I miss identified.
    Interesting picture. I don't know the ins and outs of stealth/LO enough to really comment on your comment though.

    Quote Originally Posted by timetraveller View Post
    How long has that been in the test flying stages ? If China intends to offer her on the market she would have to do the Airshow circuit to giving a proper visual representation that would make potential buyers sway there decision and I suspect her first public appreance outside China may well be the Moscow Airshow . Is there any further info on her regarding max ceiling , fuel , range and is it inflight refuel capable as well ??
    She's been flying since Jan 2011 IIRC. No info on her vital stats yet though, they're keeping that very close to their chest. Re inflight refueling, I haven't seen a picture with a probe yet (either retracted or extended) but someone might be able to correct me there.
    Last edited by digrar; 04-08-2012 at 04:54 AM. Reason: hotlinked image

  8. #8
    Senior Member Chiptox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    East Farms, PNW
    Age
    31
    Posts
    2,763

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by armored_diplomacy View Post
    X 2
    (actually that was the purpose of my picture)
    Oh yes of course. You are a straight-shooter. But others might be encouraged to draw the comparisson and it is best for the thread to nip it in the bud before it gets out of hand.

  9. #9
    Peacemaker Zorro C9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    7,544

    Default

    EdisonTrent and IconofEvi, I've asked that your posts be deleted because they're off topic. EdisonTrent, your post is flamebait and I won't have it in this thread please.

  10. #10
    ANZAC Moderator Ngati Tumatauenga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Sitting at my desk, writing my memoirs.
    Posts
    6,033

    Default

    Anyone else not interested in following the very clear and simple rules?

    Seriously, it's up to you, I can infract/suspend/ban all day long.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Maximmmm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    A Russian getting his education on in Vancouver, Canada
    Age
    20
    Posts
    1,735

    Default

    I'm with Zorro on this one, especially since the plane is massive. I don't know much about anything, but that surely lines up with the massive sizes of typical interceptors. Unless we're talking deep strike ground attack capabilities, like the F-35, but I somehow doubt that.

    Thanks for starting this thread, let's dump J-20 news here as well.

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timetraveller View Post
    If China intends to offer her on the market she would have to do the Airshow circuit to giving a proper visual representation that would make potential buyers sway there decision and I suspect her first public appreance outside China may well be the Moscow Airshow . Is there any further info on her regarding max ceiling , fuel , range and is it inflight refuel capable as well ??
    i doubt this bird will be exported, rumor has it they have another prototype for export market

    as to your second question, nothing, nada, zilch

  13. #13
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    What's your excuse for not voting?
    Posts
    9,240

    Default

    Can anyone fill me in on what this aircraft's specific role might be? I don't know much about it, but it seems too large to be an air supuriority fighter to me. Just what is/are it's role(s)? Is it simply a technology demonstrator?

  14. #14
    Senior Member Maximmmm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    A Russian getting his education on in Vancouver, Canada
    Age
    20
    Posts
    1,735

    Default

    One other thing it may be is a technology testbed, both the US and Russia had 5th gen prototypes in the air and flying around, but it took a while to settle into the final design. Or is it perhaps that the prototypes have been around for a while, but they didn't get any exposure. Hell even the J-20's coverage is though a semi-formal format.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Maximmmm's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    A Russian getting his education on in Vancouver, Canada
    Age
    20
    Posts
    1,735

    Default

    Engines are probably just for testing, all the Pak-fa prototypes are carrying standard ones as well, till the new ones finish R&D. A good assumption would be that the Chinese are doing the same.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •