Reply With QuoteMaybe for last year. No official return for 2011 yet.Originally Posted by C.Puffs
thhhppppppttttt!
Maybe for last year. No official return for 2011 yet.
Oh that explains it. You are Bill the Cat.
I play a mean tongue. Just ask all the womenz.
What's wrong with a father giving money to his daughters?Not really leading by example if plenty of Presidents prior have done it. It's pretty much common to do.
Maybe we should critique his 48k in "gifts", half of which was given to his daughters. Lets just assume he did that because he cared and not to get away from paying taxes.
Mitt filed for an extension on his 2011 return deadline, the return he released was last year's and that was after weeks of refusing to do even that. The President has been releasing returns every year.
I watched the interview with David Axelrod yesterday and it was fun to watch. The video is available here: http://video.foxnews.com/v/156364331...ama-vulnerable
Because they'll burn right through it in a year or less
So Romney building a car elevator in his house is ok and Obama, who gave his entire Nobel prize winnings to charity can't even give some cash to his daughters? Pfft.
You speak from experience?
You people need to shut up and pay what New Jesus says to pay.
I'm convinced. Maybe I will be given some breadcrumbs.
Nothing, its completely legal.
Then what was the point?
well, if thats what the govt accountants calculated, thats what it ishttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...efray-deficit/
"A top campaign adviser to President Obama made clear Sunday that the president has no plans to chip in extra money from his own income to defray the deficit -- and would insist that the tax system itself be changed so that the wealthy pay more.
Campaign strategist David Axelrod was asked on "Fox News Sunday" whether the president might contribute more to the U.S. Treasury after the release of his tax returns showed Obama paid a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. The president and first lady Michelle Obama paid an effective rate of 20.5 percent on gross income of $789,674, a lower rate than the president's secretary -- who earned less than $100,000.
The 20.5 percent rate is also less than the 30 percent Obama wants top earners to pay under the so-called "Buffett rule." "
I guess Barry isn't willing to put his money where is mouth is. I wonder how many of his followers realize he's one of the rich he constantly demonizes.
his 20.5 % on $750k is nothing compared to other fat cats who pay 10.5% on $750 million and who still complain
it just goes to show that the tax system is broken,
i remember a time i read in history books where we started a revolution b/c of taxes ......
since we can't leave, the only place is to goto another country where its not taxed to heavily
Look at these liberals, trying to take man's hard earned money.
Last edited by CPL Trevoga; 04-17-2012 at 03:20 PM.
Posting Permissions
